Born Hunter
-
Content Count
18,003 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by Born Hunter
-
I mean I’m not putting a date on it lol. I agree it’s probably not imminent. Not suggesting your death is imminent! Ha. But the shift is visible and technology will provide the means for petty private transactions which cash currently does. How many generations until virtually everyone has a smart phone… the only thing realistically stopping it right now is acceptance. As the generations roll on the controversy will just not be understood because they will have known little different. I’m in my thirties and I very well remember cash being exclusive currency. Few generations and cash will
-
Eventually mobile phones will be all you need to quickly transfer currency. At that point cashless will be very possible.
-
Discussing when cash has to be accepted.
-
Woah, you said cash has to be accepted. That’s factually incorrect. That fallacy might make retailers bottle it but it’s still a fallacy. It doesn’t bother me either way, I’m not a retailer and I don’t have problems paying for stuff. But reality is that you wouldn’t have any legal grounds to go if a retailer didn’t bottle.
-
Amazing
-
There’s not law that states that.
-
From the horses mouth fella. What is legal tender? WWW.BANKOFENGLAND.CO.UK Many people are confused about what legal tender means. It’s actually about settling debts...
-
I don’t bet mate. But it’s a fact. It might be a line that gets you places but it’s not a fact.
-
It can be refused in retail. It can’t be refused as payment for a debt. But shops don’t have to accept it.
-
I genuinely don’t know mate, I just find it boring tbh. Crypto is currently little more than a fake commodity that is traded. What is interesting about cryptos is their potential as a currency free from government control. Blockchain though I just haven’t made the effort to understand.
-
So I've read mate, mostly on the Navy side though. The SF units tend to get all the recognition from joe bloggs. But as you point out, there are much lesser known units and trades, like the ones in question, who have taken things to the next level but only get the recognition from those in the forces who actually understand. Part of me would love it if nordstream was a British job. I could take the onslaught of memes from all the truthseekers
-
Makes total sense. I've actually just been reading up about the RE divers. I just assumed the underwater demolition of, for instance shore defences for an amphibious landing, would be exclusively done by one of the clearance diver squadrons. Sort of hand in hand with destroying mines and reconnaissance etc. I didn't quite realise how skilled the RE divers were or in fact that they trained alongside Navy at Horsea. I suppose their skills would be in much more demand with more complex demolition tasks than simple shore defences. Especially these days with reduced head count. Anything '
-
Undetected? BALTOPS was shadowed by two very detected Russian warships. Not to mention the invention of the submarine, mini ROV, remotely operated mine, underwater demo and in-line-inspection pigs.
-
Yeah but he’s Ukrainian. No, fair. As a this sites wise man has already told me on this thread, “you learn something knew everyday”. For a hypothetical British op, would RE divers join up with Navy clearance divers? Or would it depend on what units are deployed. Or would it exclusively be RE? I just assumed RE area of responsibility would have normally been fresh water.
-
It was just a bit of humour tbh mate. I saw this post covering Ukrainian combat swimmers today and it was just a nice coincidence. That said, I didn’t know it wouldn’t be in their remit. I know various branches have diving units for different tasks.
-
The Germans were warned in summer by the CIA about a possible attack scenario on the Nord Stream pipelines. U.S. intelligence claimed to have intercepted Russian communications in which concerns were expressed about possible Ukrainian attacks on Western infrastructure. The Ukrainians allegedly tried to rent a boat in Sweden for this purpose. The CIA did not consider the scenario of a Ukrainian attack to be very credible, but the mere fact that the possibility of an attack on Western infrastructure was mentioned by the Russian side prompted the Americans to warn the Germans about the scenario.
-
That’s a great piece. Covering a lot, and a lot more, of what’s been discussed on here already and the potential methods of sabotage.
-
So the Royal Navy has about 3 escorts available to man this ‘500 mile wall’. Not really sure what the point in it would be anyway.
-
Don’t let them change you socks! If you want to shave your legs, you go for it.
-
Yeah, god forbid the Russians employ collarless terriers, it’d top the balance!
-
I would say it’s granted not thinking about someone on the internet isn't spiteful. LOL Have you seriously just compared locating a collarless terrier in an earth to locating a pipeline buried under the sea bed? Or is that another one of your apparently pointless and totally not nuanced anecdotes?
-
Totally agree.
-
No one I know cares about it. They’re more interested in crypto. Personally I couldn’t care less. If nothing it’s a shame to clutter the night sky. It does however change the conversation around anti satellite weapons. Such a dense satellite constellation providing comms infrastructure basically leaves this generation of anti satellite weapons inert.
-
In this instance, I agree. The evidence is stacking up to sabotage. My post you have quoted was simply pointing out that weld defects are common. If a pipeline exploded, new or old, and there was no reason to suspect sabotage or accident, then welds would be high on the list of potential causes.
-
The threat to world’s communications backbone – the vulnerability of undersea cables | Navy Lookout WWW.NAVYLOOKOUT.COM This has been in defence commentary for some time now.
