Jump to content

gnasher16

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    24,070

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    145

 Content Type 

Everything posted by gnasher16

  1. gnasher16
    No top sportsman was ever created in a classroom and you wont put in what nature left out........enjoy your sport and long may it keep you healthy,but take it for what it is.
  2. gnasher16
    Yes but what about the big new premier league signing then......................................................the magic shaving foam !!!!
  3. gnasher16
    My point is mate any idiot who thinks a dog cant be born bad shouldnt own a dog in the first place in my opinion.......its a tiny % of dogs that are and usually they dont end up in an idiots hands but very occassionally they do and its a recipe for disaster when it happens.
  4. gnasher16
    Anerley aint that down near Penge/Sydenham way ....proper Londoner how does that work then its on the Kent borders last i looked Seen plenty of deer in London as Tuffty said....not sure about Stoke Newington but seen some at Hollow Pond round the back of Whipps Cross hospital,even saw a few in Victoria Park once ........used to walk the dogs up the River Lea early in the morning years ago would often see Fallow in the distance you must of been walking round with your eyes shut Dare.
  5. gnasher16
    Or the " no bad dogs just bad owners " lunatics !
  6. gnasher16
    I knew it was only a matter of time before the ol monks got a mention !.............Its always staggered me how otherwise sensible intelligent people buy into all this nonsense i wonder if human beings will ever get bored of walking and start pretending they can fly instead ! Anyway its time i was off to brush up on my left handed 1 inch Death Punch now ive mastered the old Right Palm Heart Explosion Technique
  7. gnasher16
    Its like having all the ingredients to cook a blinding meal then expecting it to taste as good as if Gordon Ramsay cooked it !!..............when naive people try to outsmart proven success you have to ask yourself whos interests they really have at heart.
  8. gnasher16
    Neems i think you have it pretty much bang on......the beginnings of mma as a sport were to see " what worked " in a real but controlled situation......ok it became too commercial and got toned down with too many rules but i did read somewhere that since the start of the ufc organisation,of all the stoppages be it ko/tko/sub.... strikes accounts for nearly 70% of stoppages compared to around 30 % submissions.......................ok some of these are going to be kicks or whatever but the vast majority are going to be from punches,which in a sport that calls itself mixed martial arts and has no
  9. gnasher16
    never thought i would hear that nash shes rough but surely she not that bad Did you see the boat on it ....nah i promised myself i would never rump a bird who frightened me ever again
  10. gnasher16
    What a f****n moose id rather watch a Millwall game !
  11. gnasher16
    Charming what have i ever done to you Now if we,re talking out there in the world well............aint very gentlemanly but i could quite easily stick my hand down that Deirdrie Barlows throat and rip her f****n larynx out !!
  12. gnasher16
    Like any world title its all about timing and the talent thats in the division at the moment it is hard to give him much of a case....that said Darren Barker being an old Repton boy i was over the moon when he won a world title......deep down did i think he was good enough....no not really. On saying all that i still dont think we have seen the best of what Billy Joe has to offfer.
  13. gnasher16
    You make some great points and interesting reading im nowhere near the historian you seem to be so i,ll take your word for it regarding some of them names.......i think in a roundabout way we are in agreement........i think ......by rights top fighters today should be better than top fighters of yesterday....but they are not we know that,that doesnt mean they wouldnt beat them in a fight hence when we compare eras there really is no point saying well Klicthko would of beaten Frazier so Klitchko is the best its a silly attitude to take when there are so many factors to take into account. I
  14. gnasher16
    My 2 big faults are.....letting go of the pouch......and hitting the forks .......apart from that im great Do or die this aftenoon for me one last try ....Armed with a little bit more information from that video my confidence is high !
  15. gnasher16
    Cant say as theres anyone really .....theres a dopey Polish guy used to come on here id quite like to of given a little clip round the side of the head to.....but cant think of anyone ive ever come across on this forum that id actually like to hurt.
  16. gnasher16
    The only time ive ever even seen somebody march on with all that kung fu crap he was totally overwhelmed in short order by a very well known local chap of the day standing in a dickie bow outside a club who no longer trained at all...........anyone whos spent time regularly having to draw hands for any reason knows the score,people for generations have been coming out with new killer ideas and techniques the reality is a fit strong aggressive rugged guy who can give and absorb punishment who has a good basic understanding of athletic movement is going to power through virtually anything these
  17. gnasher16
    That's cause it dont matter who they are...Mancs have a saying when someone asks them a non relevant question 'bla bla the cat sat on the matt', they soon learnt to listen, if they dont someone tells em to fone the fire brigade. Please more ........come on do another one You'll have to beg a bit louder Len i can't hear ya...... I think you heard me just fine punchy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYDF666wtrc
  18. gnasher16
    They were slower smaller and weaker for that very reason.....can you imagine the Robinson/LaMotta series of fights with todays advances in training/nutrition ? They were unbelievable fights and they were men off the streets in physical comparison....................its like comparing Roger Bannister to Seb Coe......was Coe a FASTER runner of course he was......was he a BETTER runner not necessarily. Bannister was a sprinter, Coe was an 800metres specialist, but I see the analogy and its misleading.Track surfaces and different shoes have helped, and men are bigger , but running is relativ
  19. gnasher16
    Oh ok nice one theres a few on the walls in there so could be one of many...i,ll keep an eye out cheers
  20. gnasher16
    That's cause it dont matter who they are...Mancs have a saying when someone asks them a non relevant question 'bla bla the cat sat on the matt', they soon learnt to listen, if they dont someone tells em to fone the fire brigade. Please more ........come on do another one
  21. gnasher16
    My view is pretty much the same as yours Bryson.....its so hard to gauge a fighter who has never taken a smack on the whiskers the Eubank kid puts me in mind of someone who has spent his life fighting in front of a mirror....but then from what ive heard he,s sparred some good fighters who think highly of him. Billys trainer is having to constantly reel him in regarding Eubank as he knows its a far bigger fight later on with a title on the line than it is now but as you say Billy would take the fight now and thats the mad gypsy thing in him i suppose its just as well his head is on right in as
  22. gnasher16
    Great stuff i love reading ol Trimmys posts i never have a clue what he,s on about but its still fun to read him talk about Bob Jeff and Mary walking into the chippy like we should all know who these people are ..... Even on the internet theres folk you just take an instant dislike to but this guys growing on me
  23. gnasher16
    They were slower smaller and weaker for that very reason.....can you imagine the Robinson/LaMotta series of fights with todays advances in training/nutrition ? They were unbelievable fights and they were men off the streets in physical comparison....................its like comparing Roger Bannister to Seb Coe......was Coe a FASTER runner of course he was......was he a BETTER runner not necessarily. Bannister was a sprinter, Coe was an 800metres specialist, but I see the analogy and its misleading.Track surfaces and different shoes have helped, and men are bigger , but running is relativ
  24. gnasher16
    I was using one bpr sent me,nothing wrong with it i just couldnt do it plain and simple i tried every which way i must just be a cackhanded c**t !............ Thats a good video though might give it one last go after watching that
  25. gnasher16
    Do you think he would have dominated the way he did in any other era than the one he fought in Neems ?.........Good boxer with a great chin and conditioning but lets not underestimate how weak the era and how poor the competition he faced was.
×
×
  • Create New...