Russia Ukraine WW3

[mushroom 12,404]

4 hours ago, Born Hunter said:

Pretty sure the US don't have nuclear missile silos anywhere in europe...

Wasn’t there a thing about them storing warheads at Harrogate years back? More than likely not mounted, I’m sure I remember something about it though.

[mushroom 12,404]

4 hours ago, mC HULL said:

most a ukraine will side with russia anyway they was born russian  

Obviously someone hasn’t a clue about the differences between Russian and Soviet

[Elchapo 3,110]

So is the video of borris saying Russia Ave now invaded Ukraine and that Britain won't stand by without doing anything me qere going ro war or not 

[Born Hunter 17,642]

7 minutes ago, mushroom said:

Wasn’t there a thing about them storing warheads at Harrogate years back? More than likely not mounted, I’m sure I remember something about it though.

I've sort of covered this. There's no US missile silos in Europe. US warheads for tactical bombs, yes. Ocassionally even sub launched weapons as a Ohio visits maybe, but no silos. 

[mushroom 12,404]

1 minute ago, Born Hunter said:

I've sort of covered this. There's no US missile silos in Europe. US warheads for tactical bombs, yes. Ocassionally even sub launched weapons as a Ohio visits maybe, but no silos. 

I’ll have a look about later see if I can find what I’m on about lol but I believe they were just ballistic warheads. Not mounted in silos (of which non exist in Blighty) or capable of launch from British soil.

[Francie 6,362]

2 hours ago, iworkwhippets said:

  sit back n relax, dont talk silly francie, youve more up top than most on here, how can u possibly relaax when theres chance of a neuclear war, im outside diggin yet another fekin big hole fer my anderson shelter, born in one, here we go again      neh mind eh 

Fear not keith for the Lord will not forsake us,there's nothing we can do,this all has to come to pass,eternal life is at hand.

[South hams hunter 8,862]

Chelsea's billionaire owner Roman Abramovich 'has been effectively BARRED from living in Britain' | Daily Mail Online

WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK

---

Senior security sources reportedly say it is unlikely that the 55-year-old will ever be allowed to live in...

 

Thatll teach putin

[Born Hunter 17,642]

2 minutes ago, Francie said:

Fear not keith for the Lord will not forsake us,there's nothing we can do,this all has to come to pass,eternal life is at hand.

You scare the piss out of me when you talk like that. 

[gnasher16 29,705]

1 hour ago, lurcherman 887 said:

I see that aswell it’s got to be the same guy

 As i was reading it i actually rewound the telly so i could clock the geezers name....sad eh 

[gnasher16 29,705]

1 hour ago, kanny said:

 

Brilliant !.......the only sense you get these days are from comedians,the irony !

[low plains drifter 9,532]

3 hours ago, NEWKID said:

OK, wave the Russian flag mate and get your Putin poster on the wall

Get it signed at the fishing Comp as well 

You know? 

 

[kanny 19,480]

Just now, gnasher16 said:

Brilliant !.......the only sense you get these days are from comedians,the irony !

It's normally the case , that's why I always stress the importance of keeping comedy free of the shackles that normally stop us saying what we want to.

[gnasher16 29,705]

37 minutes ago, Born Hunter said:

You'll all be banging the war drums when diesel hits £2/lt! 

Wont be long...we paid £1.73 at Watford Gap last week.

[socks 32,253]

Looks like Belarus has taken the side of Russia …….

[mushroom 12,404]

4 hours ago, Born Hunter said:

Strategic weapons are for wiping out cities, infrastructure, civilians. They're intended to utterly destroy your enemy and their civilisation. No civilisation, no enemy. Tactical weapons are lower yield and designed to strike mainly military targets, hence they are often referred to as battlefield weapons.

When the Soviets got short and medium range ballistic missiles (strategic weapons) into Cuba, it meant that they could strike the US much more effectively than they could with their homeland strategic weapons. These weapons were intended to be part of an annihilation strike scenario where both sides went all out to destroy the other. Before that the US pretty much had the edge. It balanced the playing field which scared the shit out of everyone until both sides acclimatised to the new normal and found acceptable solutions.

The US nukes deployed in Europe now are mostly or entirely deployed in western Europe and are designed to be dropped by fighter jets and have much lower yields than strategic nukes. They are intended to wipe out divisions of enemy armour and troops in a terrible WWIII invasion scenario, but have limited capability as a strategic weapon ie to wipe out Russia as a civilisation. The US and Russia have ICBM silos at home, submarines and strategic bombers for that these days. The battlefield nukes would be saved for the battlefield. 

Battlefield nukes always have me thinking Starship Troopers

2 hours ago, poxon said:

Go to the Winchester have a pint wait till it all blows over. 
 

Dogs can’t look up