Born Hunter
-
Content Count
17,839 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by Born Hunter
-
Yeah I agree, that’s what attracted the aliens!
-
It wouldn’t have been, it would have been burning up in the atmosphere.
-
Dunno but what you saw was the first stage booster falling back to earth I believe, not the bit that was carrying the payload.
-
It would explain aspects of it for sure. But then other aspects don't fit that very nicely. It's a very curious incident in a long history of such.
-
I'd just read anacdotes until now but googled the source material. https://media.lasvegasnow.com/nxsglobal/lasvegasnow/document_dev/2018/05/18/TIC TAC UFO EXECUTIVE REPORT_1526682843046_42960218_ver1.0.pdf
-
But the point I'm making is we could have pensioners sat on every road on this island and it'd not make a f**k of difference to how many immigrants we get. They're totally separate. Yeah we can be a bit disgruntled that the gov are happy to crack down on crusties but not blacks but I don't think we should consider them an 'either or' choice. I agree that we should be as vigilant with protest law as we are with laws that prevent us from dealing with arseholes ourselves. Not that protest seems to make a f**k of difference really, but yeah I agree on that. I'd much rather the public loo
-
Where do we draw the line with the cowardice arguments? "c**t's wouldn't have been so brazen if those crusties were young fit lads!" "c**t's wouldn't have been so brazen if those crusties were tooled up Russians!" "c**t's wouldn't have been so brazzen if those crusties were 300 Spartans!" Well no of course not. I mean everyone makes a calculated decision on how much force to use and when, it doesn't make them cowards. Being weak crusties who wouldn't put up a fight to being removed made the whole situation a lot less serious if anything, and thank f**k. No one got hurt.
-
Mate, you make it sound like folks decide what conflicts they are going to get into for the day over their breakfast! What part of normal folks not wanting conflict in their lives don't you get? I don't expect any of those people had ever been faced with BLM or any other sort of nonsense before and even if they had can you blame them for not acting? An ambulance needed to get through so they acted and you think they're a bunch of pricks because they didn't leather a load of blacks. Galaxies apart mate.
-
LOL. Tell me how letting pensioners obstruct highways stops immigrants then? I can't see how it has any real effect at all. f**k sake, it's not like immigration has just come into the public forum and they're looking for a distraction to see it off... Not everything comes down to boats of brown people. And yeah, I applaud the public for acting rather than waiting for the government.
-
Fly with the crows...
-
I totally agree that the situation has been used to notch up legislation against protest. Not sure on the detail but it's a fact and something we should be every bit as watchful of. But you seem to think that it's somehow linked to immigration.... They're completely separate. In fact maybe the country collectively deciding to stop being fannies with 'groups of untouchables' will work in favour of that.
-
Like said, the leading terrestrial explanation for me would be that the radars were being spoofed by advanced electronic warfare systems and the 'tic-tac' craft that was intercepted by the FA-18s was in fact some sort of higher performance drone. But then why doesn't it have the thermal and flight characteristics of a jet engined aircraft?
-
I'm not talking about a video mate. I'm talking about the radar data from the Guided Missile Cruiser that was attached to the strike group. It's the main escort responsible for area air defence in a US Navy strike group. The FA-18 FLIR and optical videos just essentially confirm that what the radars were seeing was real. I don't think the alleged manoeuvres of the craft were in keeping with a malfunctioning hypersonic vehicle. In fact one of the concerns with intercepting hypersonic missiles is that they are travelling so fast that when they are neutralised (either electronically or with
-
There's the problem mate, people don't want to get handy with folks. It's just f***ing drama. And those who do like to, they go out for a night out and find it. Normal decent folks don't want to have to deal with f***ing idiots, old young black or white. They certainly don't want to have to stand by and watch emergency services stop because 'old people are untouchable'. You live the life you need to. I'd struggle to look myself in the mirror if I didn't act just like you would if you had acted.
-
110'000ft. These are fairly basic incremental tests to further development of hypersonics. The events we're talking about report an object transitioning from 20'000ft to 80'000ft through a range of velocities and manoeuvring. To a degree that exceeds any known aircraft/missile/technology. And before anyone says it, the secret squirrel government stuff just isn't that far in front these days. So much of tomorrows tech comes straight out of the private sector. It's definitely a possible explanation but there's too many leaps of faith for me.
-
Nah mate, scram jets, boost glide vehicles etc don't have the capabilities that were logged, especially at low altitudes. 7000mph is like what Mach20? That's ballistic missile re-entry velocities. And we're to believe that NASA were putting a Carrier at risk by testing this in their area? It's more likely false data caused by some sort of electronic warfare than real kinetic performance imo. To be real it would be so far advanced it'd be game changing and frankly too far to be likely. But I'm still not convinced.
-
I've made life choices to avoid this sort of nonsense, I now live in a very rural village where everyone knows you and there's heritage that makes me feel like I'm where I belong and I avoid arseholes like they're plague carriers. I can't honestly say how I'd react to this sort of behaviour and I'd rather never find out. Problems round here don't really escalate to this sort of silly shit and I'd like it to stay that way. Folks shouldn't be able to hide behind their bus pass any more than they should their skin colour. It's all f***ing wrong and it'd kill me having to deal with it.
-
Mate, they're just not comparable. You're right, we're on different planets with how we see this. You seem to think age makes someone untouchable, I certainly don't. If an old boy decided he was going to be a monumental c**t to me because he hates hunting and decides he's going to sit in front of my drive everyday all day then what am I supposed to do exactly? He's untouchable remember. So I'll have to walk 18 miles to and from work, maybe sell up and move house? He'd get 10 minutes of reasoned discussion before he'd had his quota of my 'respect for the elderly'. There's limits to that respect
- 553 replies
-
- 10
-
-
-
If you were studying an isolated ecosystem you would operate with minimal interference, at least at first, to gain a base line. Then to test your theories and understanding you may well decide to make calculated interference's to see if the effects are in line with your theories. There may also be the case of them wanting to make observations that have a level of 'risk of exposure' they consider acceptable. Seems very reasonable to me, but we're a bit too far down the rabbit hole at that point.
-
I really don't think it's just a smoke screen. They have sufficient data/evidence to suggest there is 'something' with capabilities that are potentially threatening to a carrier strike group in play and they want to know what it is. There's a long history of this sort of stuff but it's only in recent years that military technology has really made leaps in the quality and implementation of sensors. Historically it's been easy to dismiss evidence when it was solely from the eyes of a pilot, but now there's a multitude of sensors gathering data that is a bit harder to dismiss. In fact, I'd g
-
Was that not clear in my first post?
-
Well, on the evidence front I actually think there is, but that's not why I changed my mind. Evidence doesn't have to be conclusive and I'd say the Nimitz incident along with other similar events are awfully hard to explain. Technology of extra terrestrial origins remains a credible possibility, until proven otherwise imo. But as I said, that's not why I changed my mind from a hard no. What changed my mind is purely hypothetical reasoning, as we don't have much in the way of knowledge on it, so it's all I have to work with (Bill Gates hasn't cleared me for super top secret access to Space
-
I used to be a hard no but a few things have changed my mind over the years. Now, I’m not swayed either way so I can’t answer, I’d literally be spinning a dice for an answer.
-
I don’t get it, seemingly advanced craft that disappear into the sea and were calling them aliens….. …. they’re clearly Atlanteans!
-
Tbf, as much as folks still associate social media as being exclusively for selfies and gossip it’s now an essential part of business for many.
