Leeview 787 Posted October 15, 2014 Report Share Posted October 15, 2014 So, let me get this straight as I read your post, The police not the RSPCA are the people responsible for the death of the dog as they are the ones who took your dogs? So you now have to go after the police? TC No the police are the ones that have been declared the ones who have sized the dogs who passed them on to the rspca for safe keeping which they have failed to do so under the 2006 welfare act so both are responsible they will find that they are subject to privet prosecutions as both party's have failed to provide adequate care and safety for the animals Im certain I brought this up earlier: the police would nt of been at your property without the request from the arspca because they have the authority to enter your property(with the appropriate warrant) not the arspca? In view of this ruling can you not now get legal aid? as there is a case to answer Y.I.S Leeview 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stabba 10,745 Posted October 15, 2014 Report Share Posted October 15, 2014 So, let me get this straight as I read your post, The police not the RSPCA are the people responsible for the death of the dog as they are the ones who took your dogs? So you now have to go after the police? TC No the police are the ones that have been declared the ones who have sized the dogs who passed them on to the rspca for safe keeping which they have failed to do so under the 2006 welfare act so both are responsible they will find that they are subject to privet prosecutions as both party's have failed to provide adequate care and safety for the animals Im certain I brought this up earlier: the police would nt of been at your property without the request from the arspca because they have the authority to enter your property(with the appropriate warrant) not the arspca? In view of this ruling can you not now get legal aid? as there is a case to answer Y.I.S Leeview Very rarely get legal aid now unless you are in danger of getting a custodial sentence Quote Link to post Share on other sites
beast 1,884 Posted October 15, 2014 Report Share Posted October 15, 2014 my understanding is that although the police had to seize the dogs due to the rspca having no legal powers, once handed to them the rspca then have the responsibility? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dymented 2,220 Posted October 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2014 my understanding is that although the police had to seize the dogs due to the rspca having no legal powers, once handed to them the rspca then have the responsibility? Both had a legal responsibility bud 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
beast 1,884 Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 my understanding is that although the police had to seize the dogs due to the rspca having no legal powers, once handed to them the rspca then have the responsibility? Both had a legal responsibility bud thats good to know. keep at em dym! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
twobob 1,458 Posted October 30, 2014 Report Share Posted October 30, 2014 good to hear you may be getting some where all the best 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
roybo 2,873 Posted October 31, 2014 Report Share Posted October 31, 2014 I haven't read this thread for ages and am gob smacked by the posts that lampingloon posted Just a trick to and dry up support for dymented. Whether the money be used in defence and/or persuing the rspca it makes no odds to me all the same thing in my book,if they have to use their resourses in fighting then loosing ,great. best of luck Dymented 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tb25 4,626 Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 Sounds like that woman who was on here before.logging in to everyone past posts.outing peddlers and what not.f.t.b was it? Good look dy . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 Sounds like that woman who was on here before.logging in to everyone past posts.outing peddlers and what not.f.t.b was it? Good look dy . its deffo not her mate, this one is off the horse and hounds forum Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neil82 1,008 Posted November 3, 2014 Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 any news on this, nothings been posted by Dy since the 16th Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dymented 2,220 Posted November 3, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2014 any news on this, nothings been posted by Dy since the 16th nothing new yet waiting on dates as soon as i get anything new ill post it bud 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
secretagentmole 1,701 Posted November 23, 2014 Report Share Posted November 23, 2014 As it drags on so damages must increase to recompense you for the suffering this is causing! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dymented 2,220 Posted November 23, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2014 As it drags on so damages must increase to recompense you for the suffering this is causing! There extremely good at wriggling out of things and blaming others ie case up at Hartlepool woman accused of neglecting her cat the rspca took it to there vet where a dog got lose and killed the said cat Now there trying to do her for that her trial has been stopped and adjourned they twist every thing Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PeakOil 352 Posted November 23, 2014 Report Share Posted November 23, 2014 Hope you hammer the b*****d filth and the b*****d arsepca in court. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tank34 2,178 Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 Any news on court date yet mate Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.