Born Hunter
-
Content Count
17,865 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by Born Hunter
-
Well I rather like it. Any body that thinks I'm a hypocrite as an atheist can f**k off. Culture draws from many outdated ways of thinking, yet we hold on to it for the sake of preserving our identity. I don't smile to Thor every time I hear thunder, but I still call the 5th day of the week Thursday! Our culture is full of these idiosyncrasies! If however we were talking about a English national anthem I'd go for Jerusalem.
-
I'm not sure I would say greed has killed it. The Internet has killed it. All the stuff you would go to a game fair for years ago you have now at your finger tips.
-
I went and was thoroughly unimpressed, thought it was just me being a miserable b*****d. Not been to it for about 3 years, used to really rate it. I couldn't even find a ply terrier box..... Too much shite and unless you got there at 9 the queue for tickets looked f***ing horrendous! I think I'll try the CLA again next year....
-
They've only got to get lucky once....
-
There's the story... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11871975/Child-molester-given-longer-sentence-as-victims-are-Asian.html I think it's important to draw the distinction between sentencing based on the convicted and sentencing based on the victim. The convict's religion was not a consideration here, only the victim's, and more importantly the effect the crime had on the victim. Whether we like it or not, the severity of a punishment is always partially determined by the effect the crime has had on the victim. You will get longer on a charge of attempted murder if
-
f**k knows what's going on, but I do know if it was happening here I would feel a lot happier with a firearm to hand! f***ing savages!
-
A strong name like that, did you expect anything less? You'll have to get him out of that golf habit though! My younger brother has the same affliction, head green keeper etc and can hardly get the sod out shooting! Good for permission though.
-
As a matter of fact I am. One of the consultants walked to the edge of the pad and took those pictures with a good camera and sent them to a few of us boys. He takes lots of nice pictures. He likes for the night crew to wake him up when the northern lights are dancing accross the sky so he can take pictures. I recognised the lingo. Sounds awesome!
-
I also agree with BGD, the problem with vetting against mental health is that people will hide it, not get treated and then inevitably pop. Whereas had they been allowed to keep their guns and get treatment they wouldn't get to the point of popping because they felt they could get treatment.
-
I agree, I was just pointing out that when, after all these procedures, someone does go and kill their neighbour with an ounce of six, it's on no one's head except that lunatics. No system will ever be infallible and just because their GP signed the form stating that the applicant was fit and healthy, shouldn't place blame on the GP.
-
It shouldn't be on anybody's 'head' if all reasonable precautions have been adhered to. Reasonable precautions to prevent intentional abuse of the law should be taken and any incidents that do happen should just be considered shit, not the fault of legislation, not the fault of the gun, not the fault of legitimate gun owners and not the fault of medical or security personnel. Just shit that some people crack and abuse the freedoms they are given at the expense of everybody else. Comes down to what you define as reasonable. Many would say a complete ban....
-
Nice. You sound like a driller?
-
The greatest flaw of democracy is the tyrannical rule of the mob. Too often it's considered democratic and fair to persecute a minority with the whims of the majority. The obvious flaw in this is that rarely will any individual always fall into the majority and so if such a system is considered right, the mob will slowly erode freedoms of every individual until only the one's held in common remain. Imo a truly fair society protects the freedoms of minorities by the view that for the individual to protect their own minority views, they have to support those of others in spite of their oppositio
-
Maybe the oppressive wankers should concern themselves a little more with all the assault rifles and submachine guns being imported by criminal gangs than our legally held guns! By all means ensure proper licensing procedures are being adhered to but such sensationalist headlines like "gun license easier to get than bus licence" & "UK gun laws will lead to more massacres" will only add to the hysteria and land us law abiding gun owners with more restrictions and loops to jump through. A man stabs his wife..... "Evil man murders his wife in horrific attack!" A man shoots his wife..
-
Sorry mate, I didn't mean to imply you were a dedicated conspiracy theorist, lol. Yes, I agree it was a very significant event that needed investigating........ but it was. So as I say, so what that the initial report focussed on the two primary events and treated WTC7 as a separate event. It seems pretty sensible to me. 1 WTC & 2 WTC were primary events, WTC7 was a secondary event caused by the primary. It just seems like such an arbitrary point to make, if it was kept out of the report to cover something up then it would at least have some sort of substance but WTC7 got it's own inve
-
Are you sure about that? Didn't the FEMA report finding the cause of the collapse inconclusive lead to the more substantial NIST investigation being authorised? http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_meetings.cfm Apparently in the initial report, I'm denying is was reported on Okay, well I'm not going to waste my days looking into it so I'll take your word for it in good faith. Following on from that, my next thought is 'so what?'..... It didn't go un-investigated or unreported. So what if the initial report concentrated exclusively on the primary events of that attac
-
Are you sure about that? Didn't the FEMA report finding the cause of the collapse inconclusive lead to the more substantial NIST investigation being authorised? http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_meetings.cfm
-
I found that very insightful, thanks.
-
Oz is looking a bit dicey at the minute don't you think? I fear their lucrative mineral mining days that drove their economic boom are behind them.... That doesn't spell doom, lol, just uncertainty in their future. That would be great, drive down house and land prices for me to snap up! I'm looking at project management, transport or agriculture when I get over there anyway. China and India will keep growing in population, so there will always be an export market for Ozzie food. To be honest, I'd be quite happy ticking over as a full time pig dogger... Yeah, it'd certainly kn
-
Oz is looking a bit dicey at the minute don't you think? I fear their lucrative mineral mining days that drove their economic boom are behind them.... That doesn't spell doom, lol, just uncertainty in their future.
-
I can understand that. All of our individual situations are different. It's also finding the right country for you, I'm not sure I'd move to a specific country just based on the their hunting laws......there would have to be more to it for me. That said, a total & complete ban on all hunting would probably be severe enough for me to start looking...... Pro hunting politics isn't the be all and end all for me but it is something I demand. There are of course other considerations that are just as important. Life isn't all about hunting.... I can't see past N.America at the mome
-
I can understand that. All of our individual situations are different.
-
Difficult one as I'd b gutted, but doubt I'd emigrate, I don't think I could leave Britain, but I think k I'd carry on hunting, maybe not as much as not as open, but I'd still feel the need to be out at night and day break, magine a life always thinking ad wondering about hunting, but not being able to do it, fcuk em I say. Folk were running lurchers on these islands when it was a serious offence, worst they can do these days is put you in a cushy cell with a tele, I'll never stop till my body can't do it anymore I'd break the law without a doubt. But there's more to life than looking
-
#justiceformarineA It disgusts me how he was treated. Imagine if we subjected our grandparents to such moral condemnation for such behaviour during WWII.
-
Yes, but in reality I'd emigrate. f**k sticking around such a depressingly shit country in that scenario. Leave it to the lefties, that'd cross a line for me. I'd loose any sense of belonging on this island.
