Jump to content

Met police chief locked himself inside car while officer was stabbed


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, ChrisJones said:

Question of for the panel. If he had got out and been able to confront the attacker, was seriously/fatally injured in the process and the knifeman was able to inflict more casualties because the aim of the two armed police was now blocked by the unarmed chief what would the reaction be?

Genuinely curious as this debate crops up a lot at work and it's interesting reading.

The problem is the number of IFS!

What if he got out of the car, smacked the knifeman and saved other casualties???

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

He is a pure coward ... anybody with a backbone wouldn’t even weigh up the options you launch in and try and save your blokes ... he should lead from the front ... of that was one of his officers he w

Coward. If the attacker had a firearm I’d expect everyone unarmed to seek cover.., but he didn’t. A man armed with a knife can be over-powered and disarmed with numbers. He failed in his duty and he f

It's easy, from a position of safety, to say "He should have done ABC", or "I would have done XYZ", but very few of us (thankfully) will ever find ourselves in such a position, so we can't possibly kn

9 minutes ago, Deker said:

The problem is the number of IFS!

What if he got out of the car, smacked the knifeman and saved other casualties???

Agreed but every post on this thread is written from the viewpoint of what the individual would do in the same circumstances. There's no right or wrong answer because the incident played out the way it did. There is no do-over to see what would happen with prior warning of the event.

Wasn't the knifeman the final casualty after the fallen PC? I'm unsure whether there were any more casualties at this time.

Edited by ChrisJones
Typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's easy, from a position of safety, to say "He should have done ABC", or "I would have done XYZ", but very few of us (thankfully) will ever find ourselves in such a position, so we can't possibly know what we might or might not do.

BUT, he is an officer of the law, and a senior one at that, who should set an example to his officers, and lead from the front. I'm sure that other officers, and probably civilians too, were heading towards the chaos, to do what they could..........yet he made a decision to do nothing.

He, above anyone else, must realise that he failed his colleague, and he will have to live with that !

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's not forget as well that being uniformed he would have become the immediate and primary target as soon as he entered matie's line of sight. Stepping out of that car out 'gunned' would have been close to suicidal.

I'm not gonna judge the fella.

I'd rather have my own means of self defence than all the plod in the country but thats another thread.

Edited by Born Hunter
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Blackbriar said:

very few of us (thankfully) will ever find ourselves in such a position, so we can't possibly know what we might or might not do.

I agree with you BB but this is now a hypothetical training exercise for some of us based on the outcome of this act of terrorism. This isn't trying to sound cloak and dagger but working in an industry and a city where a similar kind of event can unfold without warning it's an attempt to look at what wasn't done and attempt to remedy it for the future.

There are LE and civilian security agencies that will be analysing the chief's statement to change procedure in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sat in a car with no baton or pepper spray, unarmed, f/koff, sure the pen pushing twat had something that could have been used, AND, don`t forget he was too bloody self-important to drive himself so there was the driver as well, all of a sudden there are 2 coppers who could/should have done something not just the fat twat sat in the back seat

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, scothunter said:

Serve and protect is there motto is it not. 

They changed it from "Working For A Safer London" to "Working Together For A Safer London" for the measly sum of ten grand...

So many things so little time...

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, neil82 said:

sat in a car with no baton or pepper spray, unarmed, f/koff, sure the pen pushing twat had something that could have been used, AND, don`t forget he was too bloody self-important to drive himself so there was the driver as well, all of a sudden there are 2 coppers who could/should have done something not just the fat twat sat in the back seat

 At the battle of Trafalgar, admiral  lord Nelson  sent a message to the fleet that ENGLAND EXPECTS EVERY MAN TO DO HIS DUTY.  This relates just as much now as it did then. These specimens are total cowards. Spineless.  Why should he have a chauffeur and another officer hasn't he got arms and legs to drive himself. I suppose that he thinks himself to important. What did he get all those medal ribbons for? Hiding round the back of the bike shed. Still no doubt he's one of the handshaker brigade.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, riohog said:

could have launched the car at him instead of just sitting there , ,see he got a bunch of medal ribbons on his uniform   , were they for playing chess , and snakes and ladders//

100%  mate,  should ran the car into him  and bust him up, you never know it might have saved the other coppers life who got stabbed . he had no gun or stab jackets , and the others were the same, ok  so he should have used the car as a weapon  and stopped the attack .

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Every senior officer who was in on the decision to have an UNARMED Pc on the front gate of the No1 terrorist target in the UK should be dismissed for gross negligence, they to a man or woman have the blood of this Pc on there hands ..including this senior career officer who was clearly never tested to lead from the front ...

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, ChrisJones said:

I read this one a little earlier and I'm of mixed opinions. He was unarmed. Had no body armour and was in a vehicle with two unarmed and untrained people. On the flip side, we're always told that we're not capable of doing these things ourselves because that's the domain of the police. Had he intervened he realistically could have been fatally wounded. As he didn't his conduct is under suspicion because he didn't do anything.

he sat in that locked car knowing the pc on the gate was unarmed and watched it unfold, the pc could of ran off but he  stood his ground  and paid the ultimate price ,lions led by donkeys springs to mind

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...