Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, gnipper said:

Easy enough to selectively breed in captivity but out in the wild is different,  it must be prey dependent where the bigger cats can take the bigger prey like the wallabies or something making them more successful.

You could imagine only the biggest toughest, smartest kittens/cats surviving in the wild as we have a huge fox population.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I will donate this camera to your cat hunting if you would like it  lumix fz72 60x zoom 

We I thought I'd let you know how I got on meeting greyman. Drove and met him at his, quick cuppa and we were off down the motorway to meet 2 witnesses who had,  had an incounter with what they believ

Spent the morning chatting to a taxidermist from the natural history museum,his friend is a wildlife enthusiast from manang,sets a couple of camera traps up at 5000+ meters,thin air mountain country,t

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, keepdiggin said:

There’s a population of big cats in Australia too apparently 

I wouldn't doubt it as I've seen a puma, I don't think there would be a huge number but there is a lot of remote bush here.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Ken's Deputy said:

  And how much time do you have on your hands?

I could use a few, good, men 8)

Pushing three and a half ton pages of bullshit and counter bollocks? What I'd like to do, see, is comb through this entire fukking torrent of mental vomit. Surgically slicing out each 'argument'.

" Why No Bodies? " Then, search out and Record each answer.

That done? I'd fukk off and make a web site where all this shit could be put. In a simple and orderly format :)

Point is, it would save anyone A/ Asking the same questions that were asked fifty pages back.  B/ Anyone having to repeatedly answer them. And, C/ Provide an easily searchable data base, without the crap and shit we could filter out.

No arguments. No abuse. Just potted summaries of Questions and Answers.

Any volunteers ready to step forward? Pick a typical question and search / record every single mention of it, in up to 350 pages? Screen grab it. Take it to Paint. Copy it. Crop it. Bring it back and file it. So on and so forth.

I've done this with nearly two thousand images. Only, I had to Scan Those fukkers from paper, by hand, first.

Anyone???

 

No takers then? :(

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Ken's Deputy said:

No takers then? :(

If there were no side turnings and backtracking over the same old stuff it would be boring, just one page that amounts to no solid evidence, no big cats.

 These things need revisiting now and again you never know when somethings not going to turn up.....😉

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh, it's just the way my mind works, Sandy. I'm far from OCD. But, I Do tend to see through white noise and wish to bring order, so one may sit and study the core truths.

All this 'banter' is just a load of playground bollocks. It's serving no purpose but grandstanding ego's.

I plainly see the 'challenge' here. I do like a good challenge. It stimulates me. But, were I to try and do this one single handedly? I'd simply never catch up. When I spoke, I said there nearly 350 pages? Now there's 353!

Some kunt published a reference book, one time. Never had an Index!!! :icon_eek: Guess what kunt sat there and studied Every Fukking Page of a full sized work of reference, and produced a full Index?

You, clearly, like your Google Scholar? Sadly, it's the constant white noise being generated here that creates the smoke screen needed to esquive your probes.

My way is to isolate, expose and examine. Put each point in a box it can't escape from. Then, go all out fukking Paxman on it! 🤣

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Ken's Deputy said:

Ahh, it's just the way my mind works, Sandy. I'm far from OCD. But, I Do tend to see through white noise and wish to bring order, so one may sit and study the core truths.

All this 'banter' is just a load of playground bollocks. It's serving no purpose but grandstanding ego's.

I plainly see the 'challenge' here. I do like a good challenge. It stimulates me. But, were I to try and do this one single handedly? I'd simply never catch up. When I spoke, I said there nearly 350 pages? Now there's 353!

Some kunt published a reference book, one time. Never had an Index!!! :icon_eek: Guess what kunt sat there and studied Every Fukking Page of a full sized work of reference, and produced a full Index?

You, clearly, like your Google Scholar? Sadly, it's the constant white noise being generated here that creates the smoke screen needed to esquive your probes.

My way is to isolate, expose and examine. Put each point in a box it can't escape from. Then, go all out fukking Paxman on it! 🤣

I,m far from technically minded mate, get what your saying and it makes perfect sense but is well beyond my limits 👍👍 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Ken's Deputy said:

Ahh, it's just the way my mind works, Sandy. I'm far from OCD. But, I Do tend to see through white noise and wish to bring order, so one may sit and study the core truths.

All this 'banter' is just a load of playground bollocks. It's serving no purpose but grandstanding ego's.

I plainly see the 'challenge' here. I do like a good challenge. It stimulates me. But, were I to try and do this one single handedly? I'd simply never catch up. When I spoke, I said there nearly 350 pages? Now there's 353!

Some kunt published a reference book, one time. Never had an Index!!! :icon_eek: Guess what kunt sat there and studied Every Fukking Page of a full sized work of reference, and produced a full Index?

You, clearly, like your Google Scholar? Sadly, it's the constant white noise being generated here that creates the smoke screen needed to esquive your probes.

My way is to isolate, expose and examine. Put each point in a box it can't escape from. Then, go all out fukking Paxman on it! 🤣

Well it's safe to say all pics thus far need to go in the trash section. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Ken's Deputy said:

Ahh, it's just the way my mind works, Sandy. I'm far from OCD. But, I Do tend to see through white noise and wish to bring order, so one may sit and study the core truths.

All this 'banter' is just a load of playground bollocks. It's serving no purpose but grandstanding ego's.

I plainly see the 'challenge' here. I do like a good challenge. It stimulates me. But, were I to try and do this one single handedly? I'd simply never catch up. When I spoke, I said there nearly 350 pages? Now there's 353!

Some kunt published a reference book, one time. Never had an Index!!! :icon_eek: Guess what kunt sat there and studied Every Fukking Page of a full sized work of reference, and produced a full Index?

You, clearly, like your Google Scholar? Sadly, it's the constant white noise being generated here that creates the smoke screen needed to esquive your probes.

My way is to isolate, expose and examine. Put each point in a box it can't escape from. Then, go all out fukking Paxman on it! 🤣

So what exactly are you trying to say 🤔 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blurry, ill defined pic's are just part of the white noise, Greblet. Who'd accept even a crippling photo, or footage, these days anyway? Photo's can be 'shopped'.

Footage could come from practically anywhere. Let's not even go down the rabbit hole of cgi etc. available today.

No. I prefer to work with the 'stated fact'. Such is immutable. Isolate it. Study it. Challenge it. Prove, or disprove it.

But, dispassionately. Not as part of a moving brawl of words. This entire thread's Way long since degenerated into little more than a good old football terrace face off. It's practically " Your Ma " level material now. If it was ever anything more?

So Blinkered too!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Ken's Deputy said:

Blurry, ill defined pic's are just part of the white noise, Greblet. Who'd accept even a crippling photo, or footage, these days anyway? Photo's can be 'shopped'.

Footage could come from practically anywhere. Let's not even go down the rabbit hole of cgi etc. available today.

No. I prefer to work with the 'stated fact'. Such is immutable. Isolate it. Study it. Challenge it. Prove, or disprove it.

But, dispassionately. Not as part of a moving brawl of words. This entire thread's Way long since degenerated into little more than a good old football terrace face off. It's practically " Your Ma " level material now. If it was ever anything more?

So Blinkered too!

Basically then we are left with nothing. 

Like I mentioned before, I wouldn't put it past a few individuals to fake evidence and such. 

Who knows what depths they could reach? 

To make podcasts and documentaries on the subject shows they are heavily invested in the subject. 

Evidence such has stools, fur, half eaten carcasses could be easily obtained from zoos or enclosures, everything has got a price. 

Edited by Greb147
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, you see, dear Greb; You're starting to thing compartmentaly  ;) Separate FUR. SHIT. KILLS.

On my forum, I'd have a board for each. And there Would be order in the fukking court too. Because no free for alls would be allowed. Not like here.

Interested (Or 'Invested') parties would be able to offer their best shots. In a rational and reasoned manner. Those offerings would be 'moderated' and posted in a neutral manner.

No sly digs. No name calling or dummy spitting. Just plain, boring, presentation of points and counterpoints.

Fukk the white noise out of it. And, posed questions from either side Would Demand fukking answers. No slipping away to let the dust settle. Each point could then be drilled, see?

Not gonna fukking happen though, is it? Because every kuntz having way too much fun on This shit. Showing the world how witty they are, then fading away, having actually established absolutely Nothing.

I mean, Three Hundred and Fifty pages plus? If this were a book; Do you think anyone would buy it?

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...