Jump to content

Lenmcharristar

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    10,850

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Lenmcharristar

  1. Lenmcharristar
    :laugh: yeah tys biting the hand thats feeding him and hes showing him whos boss .ffs one couldnt make it up .only on THL .if youve missed it .il remind you .tys mandatory .klit has to fight or retire .hes no boss of nothing and hes feeding no one ,hes stalling for time .hes hoping skye cannot fit in ppv in november so it then has to carry over to the new year. . hes owned and hes owned by team fury ,the gypsy warrior will reign supreme . Im sure as mandatory challenger he,d get his mill fighting for the vacant belt Wait for it is this going to be another 1.Cry victim/give abuse/make big
  2. Lenmcharristar
    4ft 11
  3. Lenmcharristar
    TOUTS OUT! once a brussel sprout always a brussel sprout. ever heard of mind your own fecking business
  4. Lenmcharristar
    black African Muslim from ireland? What's yer name paddy oshaunessy? Lolol
  5. Lenmcharristar
    see if he says the same when there's a Muslim double penetration done on him next week. Haha a Muslim has already given him some meatbetween both sets of cheeks 1 going the wrong way in a one way system
  6. Lenmcharristar
    see if he says the same when there's a Muslim double penetration done on him next week. Haha
  7. Lenmcharristar
    It's poisoned
  8. Lenmcharristar
    it did jackknife and such a cowardly judge he was. There's no denying it unless your blind deaf n dumb,
  9. Lenmcharristar
    alright ronnie how's it going fella? Do you think you'd be able to take on big joe Joyce? Lol
  10. Lenmcharristar
    Just to clarify, it's these type of loopholes and modern human rights bullshit that needs changed, those Muslim sex offenders are afraid of getting hurt if sent home? Did they give a fook about the victim until they got caught?? Not 1 single bit. Flown over lybia and dropped out from a plane with ripped parachutes
  11. Lenmcharristar
    bh, if a person involved in murder is spared jail because he or she may get depressed, do you think that's right or wrong? Well in that simple case I'd say it's wrong. But BGD sounds correct that the actual human rights legislation had nothing to do with it, however I also agree with you that the sentence was clearly based on this liberal rights bollocks that seems to have infected society, the judge deeming that the murderer had a right not to suffer potential depression through prison. I agree with both of you. This general attitude in society that allows for these injustices to occur need
  12. Lenmcharristar
    That's exactly what I was doing, did you not see where I repeatedly told him his problem was with the judge not the HRA? It's why I got so fed up with him being so dense ignoring my posts, for feck sake it's catching! trust me if she had went to jail there would have been a 1st class recorded delivery of her cps papers direct in a chartered plane to the ECHR.
  13. Lenmcharristar
    bh, if a person involved in murder is spared jail because he or she may get depressed, do you think that's right or wrong?
  14. Lenmcharristar
    Dishonest? The only dishonesty here was the injustice for the soldiers families. She was involved and has been involved in plenty of other terrorist activities. It's because it's against British soldiers that you won't condemn it.
  15. Lenmcharristar
    That's it deny everything and blame someone else
  16. Lenmcharristar
    neil, you won't get through to him, he rang the Sinn Fein office and said he's being asked truthful sensible questions by joe public about a murderer, what should be say? The answer he got was, use big fance words like, dialogue, Good Friday agreement, peaceful protests, cross community relations etc etc but the top rule is deny everything and blame somebody else.
  17. Lenmcharristar
    You must have rang stormount for that answer. The woman was a convicted terrorist before she was involved in these murders then you say she posed no risk to anybody??? Your answer shows your usuall far to the left stance you'd get on well with corbyns new labour and a job in the ni assembly. Your answer says it all.
  18. Lenmcharristar
    obviously dropped a lot less than yourself. Right one more question, do you think the said woman should have gone to jail? Don't dodge the question
  19. Lenmcharristar
    the only stupid one on here is you. Bet you got the HR act tattooed on your body fs. Just incase you go to commit crime and gurn about the time. Get over yourself.
  20. Lenmcharristar
    Your problem is with the judge not the human rights act, you're obviously too thick to understand that though because I've told you three fecking times and you're still banging on about "loopholes" that don't exist. That'll be the end of my daily bashing my head against a wall session. You can't fix stupid. aye dead on. The truth came out in the end. She was spared jail because she suffers depression. All to do with this human rights bullshit, rife within modern society in gb today. Anywhere else she was away for her tea.
  21. Lenmcharristar
    i wonder if they will kennel them for you whilst you have a couple of weeks holiday as part of there lifetime support package that lifetime support goes out the window with the refund clause
  22. Lenmcharristar
    Her rights were held higher than the murdered soldiers. It's wrong no natter how you try to defend it, and it wasn't her 1st case either she was a convicted terrorist. But would never do in modern society if the perpetrator didn't become the victims. It's just wrong. Loophole that needs closing and sorting out
  23. Lenmcharristar
    The whole point of human rights is that they're universal so we've hardly got them confused, these seriously rare cases of scumbags gaming the system are a small price to pay to guarantee our own protection under the same laws.Would you really trust the government to decide who gets human rights and who doesn't? I'm pretty certain we can come up with legislation a bit more robust than that! Would I trust the government? Well I'm trusting the courts and they're letting me down! What's the difference? You obviously don't understand the concept of universal human rights so this conversatio
  24. Lenmcharristar
    The whole point of human rights is that they're universal so we've hardly got them confused, these seriously rare cases of scumbags gaming the system are a small price to pay to guarantee our own protection under the same laws.Would you really trust the government to decide who gets human rights and who doesn't? I'm pretty certain we can come up with legislation a bit more robust than that! Would I trust the government? Well I'm trusting the courts and they're letting me down! What's the difference? You obviously don't understand the concept of universal human rights so this conversatio
  25. Lenmcharristar
    The whole point of human rights is that they're universal so we've hardly got them confused, these seriously rare cases of scumbags gaming the system are a small price to pay to guarantee our own protection under the same laws.Would you really trust the government to decide who gets human rights and who doesn't? I'm pretty certain we can come up with legislation a bit more robust than that! Would I trust the government? Well I'm trusting the courts and they're letting me down! What's the difference? You obviously don't understand the concept of universal human rights so this conversa
×
×
  • Create New...