jukel123
-
Content Count
7,587 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by jukel123
-
More hot air on this thread than between the boxers in the run up to the fight.?
-
Not into boxing... but respect to this little lady.
jukel123 replied to Mr Wilkes's topic in General Talk
Sooner or later they will overmatch her with a boy who will give her a hiding.That would be horrible. Mixing the sexes in a boxing ring is not right.It's just not. -
Not into boxing... but respect to this little lady.
jukel123 replied to Mr Wilkes's topic in General Talk
Made me feel uneasy. The girl was extremely talented ,but girls should not fight boys. Its wrong. My boys were taught you should never hit a woman. Surely by mixing the sexes in the ring you are giving mixed messages to boys about domestic abuse? But my God she wss talented. -
I believe Lennox Lewis would have made short work of Fury. Having said that Fury's comeback after two years out is nothing short of miraculous. I think a lot of his mental health problems stemmed from being brought up to fulfil his father's dreams. No wonder he went on a bender when he finally made his dream come true. I hope he goes on to make a few bob for himself. How he got up from being sparked out and then went on to win the fight is nothing short of miraculous. He should be called Lazarus from now on.
-
Of the two in the photo which is supposed to be the looker? Genuine question, (I am from Wales.)?
-
Is your galgo vocal during a course Sandymere?. What qualities do they possess which saluki hybrids don't have? What is their everyday temperament like? Any other info would be appreciated. Genuinely interested not being negative at all.
-
There's no dilemma here. Rehome. There's lots of psychological pressure with regard to dogs. 'A dog makes a happy home', the 'faithful lurcher providing food for the family', a 'dog' is for life etc. A family is for life ffs. If the dog is causing tension and stress then rehome pronto. You can buy another dog when your situation improves. You can't buy another family. Let's face it dogs in this country are put on pedestals. Everybody wants to rehome one from a rescue centre and 'virtue signal' whilst doing so. I've rehomed dogs, I've put some dogs down. So have lots of people on
-
Here's a clone: https://www.preloved.co.uk/adverts/show/118185828/lurcher-pups.html?link=%2Fsearch%3Fkeyword%3Dlurcher%2Bpups
-
Geoff Hurst will be dragged before the courts and stripped of his knighthood along with all UK rappers and lyrics companies.
-
Fair enough,BH. I genuinely thought I hadn't explained myself. Second retort is also fair. In any case I wasn't singling you out. Perhaps we can both be a little prickly. The whole thread has been highly charged emotionally.
-
Born thank you for acknowledging that " I mean well". What was it Captain Mainwearing used to say somewhat witheringly......"You stupid Boy". In any case I think you've genuinely missed the point. " which is worse fiddling a white kid or a black kid?" you write. But the point I'm making, following the Solicitor General, is that sentences should be stiffer when a child is deliberately TARGETED because of their race or skin colour. People were horrified that Stephen Lawrence was targeted because of his black skin.Most of us are aghast that primarily Asian men should target girls becau
-
Couldn't resist this point. I would also support a new law entitled: Racially Aggravated Sexual/Child Abuse. It's long overdue. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40909065
-
Not me, to quote a famous phrase, "I'm out". With Wilf here things could get very dark. Pun intended.
-
Born we are so far apart there's no point in continuing the discussion. Governments exert control over their citizens in all sorts of sophisticated ways. They don't have to resort to brute force. You could have as many guns as you like but if they close down the internet or the banks or the food supply we will all be fecked within days. In any case to take the gun argument to its logical conclusion, we should all have nuclear missiles tucked away to save us from tyrannical governments. I just don't it get it ,presumably you don't understand my position either. Let's leave it there. Good night
-
Orwell was referring to a normal individual's right to own a weapon. Not the drug crazed,the vioelent criminal or the child psycho with a grudge.
-
Born your breathtaking arrogance knows no bounds! Firstly you quote Orwell to me. Believe me I am more familiar with Orwell's writings than you. Secondly, you threaten me with your alleged towering intellectual superiority with regard to gun laws.I remain unafraid. Good night.
-
Born you appear to have aligned yourself with the alt right. I did not suggest you were that mad. However, let's run with that. You do have sympathy with the crazy Americans who defend their gun laws.Even though thousands of innocent yanks are killed and maimed annually for an ideal: the freedom to bear arms. I think the freedom to walk down the street and go to school without being shot is a far greater freedom. You say smokers are bullied by non smokers. I say shite, look at the nosedive heart attack rates have experienced since the new legislation. Look at the projected number of lives
-
The new law has brought the issue into the public domain and pushed the refresh button. I would be bluffing if I pretended to be familiar with 60 odd laws. Whatever the difference between this new law and the old laws are..I am all for it even if only one person benefits from it.
-
I believe in the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. I don't care if the 'alt right bleat' about individual freedom. Whether it's gun laws, tobacco laws, laws against hammering children and partners, health and safety at work, I'm all for those laws. ( Although not the hunting laws.) I live in the real world, and am not impressed by academic arguments criticising the "nanny state" . I'm all for free school meals, proper NHS provision, social housing, laws to protect against usurers and bad landlords, laws to protect children seeing porn or protecting them from junk food advertisi
-
People moaned loud and hard about the smoking laws. It's been a fantastic piece of people friendly legislation. Same with laws preventing the smacking of children. There were always those who said "it's nothing to do with the state what I do to my children in my own home". But slowly behaviour has changed for the better. Laws should sometimes be welcomed, this new piece of legislation is a step in the right direction.
-
EXACTLY! And eventually it will impact on people's behaviour.
-
Born, behave! "Domestic abuse most commonly against men". Rearrange this sentence so it makes sense." Must I talk not bollocks"
-
Sometimes when new laws are passed they have good unintended consequences. For example, You rarely if ever see a stressed parent knocking feck out of their toddler in a shopping centre nowadays. Because somehow, perhaps by peer pressure, and the law, the parent knows that is unacceptable in modern society. The smoking laws were brilliant. Nobody now would light up in the same room as children or smoke in a car with children, again more because of peer pressure than anything else. Few people allow their dogs to crap in public places, a few years ago many people did. Again it's a mixture of law
-
I remember years ago taking a woman I knew, a neighbour, to a women's refuge. She had two kids with her. I ran her to the refuge and began to help her inside the door of the refuge. The manageress pointed to a sign on the door. It read: "No men beyond this point". Made me feel weird to be considered part of the problem, one of the enemy so to speak . Some of those women lived in absolute fear of leaving the refuge because their men would be waiting for them outside. f****n horrendous. I'm out of this thread, going to walk my dogs.
