She would of been breeding soon so you done good there.
My ghost fox is still about. A neighbor says she was screaming in their back yard the other night, cow!
Dave's just looking after me, well I think so, I've not had any cock pics off him which I am especially pleased about!
And long me it be so thus!
Any way, I in the past have sent you PM's and now I'm upset! How could you forget so easily? ?
Has it got a bolt detent?
My 452 has not so once safety is off and your not mindful one can lift the bolt handle a fraction with the hand on the stocks wrist and cause a fail to fire.
The spread is the variation between the highest and lowest velocity in a string of shots. So the velocity figure is an average from that barrel and of an unknown number of shots.
As the barrel shortens the variation gets less in this example (not a rule, it can go the other way).
If that is a common trend for the Hornady mouse rimfire it could be argued the shorter barrels are more efficient. It would need more data to confirm that assumption.
Inherent with barrel length loss is velocity loss. Some calibres are worse than others.
Deker has kindly shown that in the barrel length you want the loss is minimal and won't really make a jot of difference in the field.
Ouch!
I use to reload for mine too. It's a better option with about 700 shots to a pound of powder.
I sometimes got cheap s&b 45grn bullets fmj that were very good and if loaded backwards made good stoppers!
The good old days. I use to look out for shops selling off stuff for customers.