All Activity

Trump bringing the death penalty back isn’t for your ordinary joe blogs….. for example the former director of the fbi James comey has just been indicted and plenty more to come

No I won’t. Of course there’s murder and other serious crime in Saudi and there is undoubtedly miscarriages of justice. Crime IS low and punishments are as harsh as you get, but one thing is certain, if you are a murderer, paedophile, rapist or, strangely enough, a poisoner of wells, you certainly will never recommit. If you are a thief and have been found guilty of the crime three times, with at least three witnesses each time , you lose your hand, which I guess is a very good deterrent for you recommitting . Cheers.

Stick to fishing you bully .

Tik Tok bollox.

What would you regard as crimes against humanity ?

You can take a daily minor offence ie speeding as a classic example I’ve spent weeks in court fighting everyone I’ve ever had and I am deemed guilty until I can prove otherwise last one I won proved I wasn’t driving I was given 6 points and a £1500 fine for failing to return a form that they had no proof of ever sending I had to go back a further 3 times including a day in crown court lol to get it all squashed no normal person would go to those lengths and just accept there fate I just enjoy being that annoying old cnut

Police are sometimes 'over zealous' let's say in putting ' evidence' before courts. All organisations have corrupt employees. Jurors can be totally stupid f**k wits. Or they can have an opinion swayed in one direction by a highly competent barrister , or in another way by an incompetent or disinterested barrister. Jurors could enter court determined to find somebody guilty because of existing prejudices or slanted media coverage of the case. Judges can be biassed, or have fallen asleep whilst witnesses are testifying. Some may want to make a name for themselves as 'tough guy' judges

Miles out

Peroni in Wales trying to fit a composite door....

Sounds ideal …BUT .. How much ? Has it got four legs and two eyes ( the same colour , feck those dodgy uns with a blue and brown ) .and have they fed it bounce chunks oh . And 23 and 3/8ths tts .

for a change ... lasagne and salad

Bit of all sorts today, I turn up here and there’s just a list of little jobs, got the bank side seeded, removed a fence, sorted a drain problem and had a look at the treatment plant, turns out the air pump has packed up, so they will have to order one and I’ll fit it, good days graft but I don’t work as hard as the lawnmower, that things put a proper shift in today

A severe kicking then taking 2 the bladdy hospital

Exactly that, power of statute takes presidence over presumption of innocence !

I’ll give you a tidy example, the lads in the Stephen Lawrence case…… They were found not guilty TWICE !…..but since then a coordinated political and media campaign has seen them hounded relentlessly leading up to the “magical” discovery of a microscopic drop of blood on the collar of a shirt that had been buried at the back of an evidence room for 20 year !!! This lead to a couple of them getting 18 years, in the right circumstances they would be dead and all engineered by the state despite being found not guilty TWICE ! How the f**k are you going to trust the state ?

I’ve never believed “innocent until proven guilty “ . If that were true ,logically , no one could be held on remand. If “innocent until proven guilty” were true, a person on remand , who hasn’t been found guilty of a crime, would therefore be an innocent person illegally held ! Of course you can’t let someone charged with a serious crime free to walk the streets, but “innocent until proven guilty” simply doesn’t stand examination! Cheers.

Everyone is forgetting that Blair fundamentally altered the criminal justice system, for decades you have not had the presumption of innocence…..you have to prove you are innocent ! We still all think it’s innocent until proven guilty, it isn’t, they just say it is because that’s a handy myth to keep going….. For me, it’s a no brainer…..how the f**k are you going to trust a police force and a criminal justice system that kept quiet about the mass gang rape of white children for reasons of political expediency and are routinely knocking on peoples doors for social media posts lik

I’m for the death penalty when it’s beyond ALL doubt, as in the case of the murder of those children, the Moors Murderers, the Wests, etc. Problem is the law as it stands says it must be beyond REASONABLE doubt. It could raise the spectre of two tier murder charges/sentencing, as in a defence lawyer could say “ if you are not going to impose the death penalty, you must have some doubt as to the guilt ! “ It opens a legal can of worms. Cheers.

As long as they don’t include Lidl ! Cheers.

sound I won’t be able to work or go to Sainsbury’s I’m in lol

One night after loads a rain it was bone dry by the morning lol Dont get carried away Let's see who's putting days out crimbo on

All based on everyone in authority doing the right things for the right reasons without favour or prejudice brother……hows that worked out ? Nah, you can’t trust these people and certainly not with that amount of power !……

Couldn’t agree less , in this day and age , with the huge amount of proper evidence ala dna , cctv, footage , for example the utter piece of filth who carried out the Southport stabbings , Id go back to hangings on the court house lawn if we could

Mate where is that from ? You are loosing credibility with these “my mate Dave says that …” statuses ? in what way shape or form are the pharma people gonna face the death penalty in the western world ? what next ? The people behind the Thames water saline plant disaster hung off tower bridge ? behave

There’s a plot on the banks of chew valley lake near Bristol were you can be buried standing up in a wicker basket then they put a tree on your nogging seems a bit more natural and tolerable than getting your nan striped down by badgers and fox’s as we don’t have many vultures and they are pretty tidy at clearing the dead