Looks Like They All In On It Dirty B@st@rds

[delswal 3,819]

I don't agree with what he's suggesting at all, but I think I do get what he's saying. Police resources are shrinking and the paedo problem is growing. The focus has to be getting the high level offenders locked up. It's a sad state of affairs that the people who deal with these animals day in day out should have to worry about selecting which beasts to go after, and don't have the resources to lock them all up.

Don't select which beast to go for, go for them all. Then when they go to the jail leave them in general population and not protected on the numbers. They won't get the chance to re-offend again, would be a good example and save the tax payers thousands.

[ChrisJones 7,975]

How can viewing a crime be okay?

 

We're not exactly talking about consenting adults are we?

[WILF 51,127]

Modern society mate.........surrender and call it a victory

[ChrisJones 7,975]

f**k that... tactical retreat...

[king 12,038]

You couldn't make it up.

Some crazy laws about.

Run your dog on a hare.

Lose your motor.dog.and fined.

Watch child porn.thats ok.fecking crazy.

[Francie 6,368]

 

He should be shot, never mind sacked, he probably one of them.

If the place is at saturation point, why not lessen the investigations into smoking weed, growing it, or policing hunting with dogs, i means is childrens lifes less worthy than a fox or broc.

Dirty scumbag wants hanged.

Brace yourselfs lads it will get worse.

its happening mate, 1st the legality of poofs, shagging animals, gay adoption and Obama letting people use whatever toilets the want if they feel mixed gender that day. Next the legalisation of a pedo. Christ be aswell hurrying up in his comeback to stop it. Leftards are ruining the world

This is very worrying, a top cop coming out with this is just a f***ing diagrace,

 

God help us len.

[j j m 6,626]

i know what id do with them

[Jonjon79 13,358]

i know what id do with them

I have no idea what I'd do with them and, I hope I never have to find out

 

In these cases - long live vigilante justice.

[twobob 1,519]

stop giving india aid that they nolonger need and build new jails for the sick flucks maybe ?

[lanesra 4,007]

I don't agree with what he's suggesting at all, but I think I do get what he's saying. Police resources are shrinking and the paedo problem is growing. The focus has to be getting the high level offenders locked up. It's a sad state of affairs that the people who deal with these animals day in day out should have to worry about selecting which beasts to go after, and don't have the resources to lock them all up.

Without the animals who watch it the animals who create it would have no audience so there both as bad as each other IMO , These people are there to uphold the law not change it too suit there agenda . . This man should be sacked !!

[Jonjon79 13,358]

 

I don't agree with what he's suggesting at all, but I think I do get what he's saying. Police resources are shrinking and the paedo problem is growing. The focus has to be getting the high level offenders locked up. It's a sad state of affairs that the people who deal with these animals day in day out should have to worry about selecting which beasts to go after, and don't have the resources to lock them all up.

Without the animals who watch it the animals who create it would have no audience so there both as bad as each other IMO , These people are there to uphold the law not change it too suit there agenda . . This man should be sacked !!

 

Spot on

[pesky1972 5,687]

 

I don't agree with what he's suggesting at all, but I think I do get what he's saying. Police resources are shrinking and the paedo problem is growing. The focus has to be getting the high level offenders locked up. It's a sad state of affairs that the people who deal with these animals day in day out should have to worry about selecting which beasts to go after, and don't have the resources to lock them all up.

Without the animals who watch it the animals who create it would have no audience so there both as bad as each other IMO , These people are there to uphold the law not change it too suit there agenda . . This man should be sacked !!

Not disputing anything you're saying, except maybe that he should be sacked. Think about why he's saying this now.., because he's a paedo? Or maybe because he's working at the sharp end and can see that the police are losing the battle. Budget cuts and the explosion of historic abuse claims mean that there is no chance they can deliver justice to all with the resources they have. His comments are probably a calculated petsonal risk to draw attention and provoke an outcry which may result in better funding. He hasn't said they should get off as it's not a crime, but he has genuine concern that people directly hurting kids are getting away with it because the justice system is so congested.

Like you or anyone on here I'd like to put a bullet in every one of them. Sadly that's not how it works.

Question is..., if you only have one bullet, do you shoot the guy who watched kiddie porn in his bedroom, or do you shoot the guy who groomed and raped a kid. I know that watching it isn't victimless but I know who gets my bullet.

[riohog 5,939]

 

 

 

I don't agree with what he's suggesting at all, but I think I do get what he's saying. Police resources are shrinking and the paedo problem is growing. The focus has to be getting the high level offenders locked up. It's a sad state of affairs that the people who deal with these animals day in day out should have to worry about selecting which beasts to go after, and don't have the resources to lock them all up.

Without the animals who watch it the animals who create it would have no audience so there both as bad as each other IMO , These people are there to uphold the law not change it too suit there agenda . . This man should be sacked !!

Not disputing anything you're saying, except maybe that he should be sacked. Think about why he's saying this now.., because he's a paedo? Or maybe because he's working at the sharp end and can see that the police are losing the battle. Budget cuts and the explosion of historic abuse claims mean that there is no chance they can deliver justice to all with the resources they have. His comments are probably a calculated petsonal risk to draw attention and provoke an outcry which may result in better funding. He hasn't said they should get off as it's not a crime, but he has genuine concern that people directly hurting kids are getting away with it because the justice system is so congested.

Like you or anyone on here I'd like to put a bullet in every one of them. Sadly that's not how it works.

Question is..., if you only have one bullet, do you shoot the guy who watched kiddie porn in his bedroom, or do you shoot the guy who groomed and raped a kid. I know that watching it isn't victimless but I know who gets my bullet.

hopefully one would be standing behind the other and both would cop it

[Silversnake 1,099]

 

 

I don't agree with what he's suggesting at all, but I think I do get what he's saying. Police resources are shrinking and the paedo problem is growing. The focus has to be getting the high level offenders locked up. It's a sad state of affairs that the people who deal with these animals day in day out should have to worry about selecting which beasts to go after, and don't have the resources to lock them all up.

Without the animals who watch it the animals who create it would have no audience so there both as bad as each other IMO , These people are there to uphold the law not change it too suit there agenda . . This man should be sacked !!

Not disputing anything you're saying, except maybe that he should be sacked. Think about why he's saying this now.., because he's a paedo? Or maybe because he's working at the sharp end and can see that the police are losing the battle. Budget cuts and the explosion of historic abuse claims mean that there is no chance they can deliver justice to all with the resources they have. His comments are probably a calculated petsonal risk to draw attention and provoke an outcry which may result in better funding. He hasn't said they should get off as it's not a crime, but he has genuine concern that people directly hurting kids are getting away with it because the justice system is so congested.

Like you or anyone on here I'd like to put a bullet in every one of them. Sadly that's not how it works.

Question is..., if you only have one bullet, do you shoot the guy who watched kiddie porn in his bedroom, or do you shoot the guy who groomed and raped a kid. I know that watching it isn't victimless but I know who gets my bullet.

I agree with Francie, move resources from other areas, protecting kids has got to be top priority. For any police officer, let alone a high ranking one to think otherwise deserves sacking at the very least.

[pesky1972 5,687]

 

 

 

I don't agree with what he's suggesting at all, but I think I do get what he's saying. Police resources are shrinking and the paedo problem is growing. The focus has to be getting the high level offenders locked up. It's a sad state of affairs that the people who deal with these animals day in day out should have to worry about selecting which beasts to go after, and don't have the resources to lock them all up.

Without the animals who watch it the animals who create it would have no audience so there both as bad as each other IMO , These people are there to uphold the law not change it too suit there agenda . . This man should be sacked !!

Not disputing anything you're saying, except maybe that he should be sacked. Think about why he's saying this now.., because he's a paedo? Or maybe because he's working at the sharp end and can see that the police are losing the battle. Budget cuts and the explosion of historic abuse claims mean that there is no chance they can deliver justice to all with the resources they have. His comments are probably a calculated petsonal risk to draw attention and provoke an outcry which may result in better funding. He hasn't said they should get off as it's not a crime, but he has genuine concern that people directly hurting kids are getting away with it because the justice system is so congested.

Like you or anyone on here I'd like to put a bullet in every one of them. Sadly that's not how it works.

Question is..., if you only have one bullet, do you shoot the guy who watched kiddie porn in his bedroom, or do you shoot the guy who groomed and raped a kid. I know that watching it isn't victimless but I know who gets my bullet.

I agree with Francie, move resources from other areas, protecting kids has got to be top priority. For any police officer, let alone a high ranking one to think otherwise deserves sacking at the very least.

 

I agree on priorities but move resources from where? Much easier said than done. Police Scotland just announced they're cutting numbers to plug a £60m gap. Forces up and down the land are doing the same.

Like I said I think his comments were measured to facilitate a response, and in order to secure more funding. And most likely a gamble on his own career in order to do so.