Born Hunter
-
Content Count
17,864 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by Born Hunter
-
Interestingly Gibralter was very nearly the first major Argentine attack on non South Atlantic territory durring the Falklands. A small Argie swimmer canoeist commando unit was flown out to Spain where they were to covertly cross to Gilbratar and attach Limpet mines to our Naval vessels. They carried out all the reccon and were ready for the attack but foiled by Spanish police. They were consiquently treated very well by the Spanish authorities and released after the conflict, in spite of the fact Spain is a NATO member and had a full obligation to inform us (their NATO allies) of the attempte
-
Literally only yesterday I was reading about Gibraltar. Same rule goes for the Gibraltarians as the Falklanders, if they want to remain British then we will let them. I believe the last vote was over 99% in favour of remaining a British Overseas Territory! This'll go no further than politics but I do hope our politicians respond appropriately!
-
6: A human penis is the only part of the body which is impervious to a nettles sting.
-
You've got a real hard on for Brian haven't you!
-
That's HORRIFIC! God I feel grim now.....
-
By the sounds of it Gnash it's all worthless............ I'll give you a tenner job lot, eh?
-
It wouldn't take a huge amount of effort to catch them, they only come out to practice such acts on very limited days of the year. I'm sure a TA or RMR led exercise could sort this out at minimal cost to the tax payer.
-
f***ing hell, I'm not too late am I? f**k off baw!
-
Only the ones cut with Silver.
-
Have done, none match this for right angles or pattern But there are still lines and ridges that go for hundreds of miles in the middle of deep Ocean. They can't exist in reality but do on the image. They can and do, thought someone with your background would have heard of plate techtonics? http://www.livescience.com/18308-google-earth-update-erases-atlantis.html Sorry Malt, I'm obviously aware of that, but I was under the impression Google maps was surface imagery in the visable colour spectrum not an actual map of the ocean bed with impossed colour correlating to the sonar image?
-
Have done, none match this for right angles or pattern But there are still lines and ridges that go for hundreds of miles in the middle of deep Ocean. They can't exist in reality but do on the image.
-
Canny find Fuchal?????................. Here: image.jpg That's the one now someone explain this mofo My understanding of nature is it cannot produce this kind of structure waiting to be enlightened My guess is it's an artifact of the image processing. Look anywhere else in the ocean and you'll see strange lines etc which don't make any sense either.
-
Do either of you guys own a hammer, handsaw, tape measure, set of spanners, etc? . Yeah, bought from and shop I'll add, not dragged out of the bottom of a skip and fettled into working order. Aye and I bet they're all still shiny new, unused and hung on the right peg in an immaculately clean shed? Nah, they're in an old game bag covered in mud along with odd bags of nails and screws, drill/driver bits, tape, etc etc. Other tools scattered about the house and car. I don't mind mess, just can't stand crap being kept for the job that doesn't and never will exist. People will keep a
-
Perhaps it is related to the underwater race of humanoids discovered in Washington State in 2004 – the so called “aquatic ape” beings? (See last article titled “Animal Planet: Navy Cover-Up Of Intelligent Beings Found in Ocean”)
-
Do either of you guys own a hammer, handsaw, tape measure, set of spanners, etc? . Yeah, bought from and shop I'll add, not dragged out of the bottom of a skip and fettled into working order.
-
i have everything from a 1/5th scale spitfire, that i was going to fit an engine in many years ago to a half built British seagull boat engine ( i don't even own a boat) plus tools that i haven't got a clue what there for I'm quite a lazy sod by nature so I'd tollerate that so long, then one day I'd have it on me and sort the lot. Seemingly useful stuff can be kept but if in time it's not been used then it needs to go. That said, is there any better childhood memory than ferreting through my Grandpas stable and sheds for all manor of crap. That was awesome.
-
Sometimes I see something that I think will be usefull but as a rule if it's not got a job it goes. I hate the attitude "we'll keep it because it might come in use, just put it over there". "CRAP, CRAP AND MORE FECKING CRAP! BIN IT, BURN IT OR FECKING USE IT!"
-
That's multiculturalism for you!
-
he's frantically researching the now to prove him wrong, think I've just filled his afternoon with one word Lol, nothing I've said has been proven wrong Baw. But I've proved plenty he said wrong. Haven't you got a English Saluki owning keeper to harass?
-
L O S E R Don't f***ing start because you know I'll bite!
-
Life's too short.
-
Well done for the copy and paste, any chance of the actual link? The crown jewels, buck house etc etc do not belong to the Crown, they are state owned, but the Crown Estate does belong to the serving Monarch. As long as the Queen is the serving Monarch the Crown estate is her personal property.
-
Well, actually, to correct you, he didn't hand the keys over, just the control of the Crown revenue. The Crown itself is still the personal property of the Monarch. History is great but taking bits you like and interpretting them wrongly for your own agenda is neither history nor truth.
-
It might be royalist crap but it's the truth and what you have said about costing the tax payer is complete bollocks. Really so they dont cost the tax payer about 38.5mil a year to keep!! oh and then there are security cost of course! then the cost of flying them all over the place! working out about 62mil a year!! sorry my figures are 2years out of date so may have gone up a little. your right though with they money they have its complete bollocks. It might be royalist crap but it's the truth and what you have said about costing the tax payer is complete bollocks. Really so they dont cost
-
It might be royalist crap but it's the truth and what you have said about costing the tax payer is complete bollocks. Really so they dont cost the tax payer about 38.5mil a year to keep!! oh and then there are security cost of course! then the cost of flying them all over the place! working out about 62mil a year!! sorry my figures are 2years out of date so may have gone up a little. your right though with they money they have its complete bollocks. It might be royalist crap but it's the truth and what you have said about costing the tax payer is complete bollocks. Re
