Born Hunter
-
Content Count
18,001 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by Born Hunter
-
Not to mention the fact the Tories aren't the Leave campaign. Nor did the Leave campaign make the promise, because they were in no position to. Neither campaign for the referendum were in a position to make policy promises and more fool anyone that believed that. So I'm gonna call "FAKE NEWS" on that one. lol
-
LOL, and yet for most of us it's still not right wing enough! Feed ya own kids right and stop asking the Tories to do it.
- 107 replies
-
- 19
-
-
The Dangers Of Leopard Hunting In Africa
Born Hunter replied to Born Hunter's topic in Big Game Hunting
Part four, another Leopard hunt. https://www.fieldsportsmagazine.com/Shooting-Stalking/close-calls-part-4.html Look at that wound! -
Tail and toss........... straight out the window!
-
The US Bill or Rights doesn't cover the UK.
-
Called a waxer or wax slug. All these poor mans slugs are from the US back in the day for if you got a chance at something big when out after small stuff. Yeah, for all practical purpose they are not okay in the UK! LOL
-
Unfortunately if you believe that the sort of change needed is never going to happen so long as the system is rigged for perpetuity then you are left to vote based on the only things that are up for grabs and hunting is one of them I believe. I honestly don't know how I'm going to vote so this isn't me backing up my vote just saying it how I see it. The hunting issue is a double sided coin of liberty and livelihood. For folks like us it's just liberty but for others the issue of one of livelihood too. The hunting ban hasn't cost many theirs but another anti government could do. It coul
-
That's why I mix my libertarianism with the strong border control and protectionism of nationalism. Otherwise the freedoms, abolition of rights etc that I talk about and that are considered so counter productive by the mainstream of UK political views, I believe would far from wreck culture but enrich it. It would give our villages, town, parishes, counties and country back the responsibility to look out for each other rather than look to the decadent central government to do it for us. It's no surprise you find the strongest communities in the furthest reaches from central government.
-
Mate. Don't take what I'm saying to heart. It doesn't come across well on here and tbh if your mindset is anything close to what is typical of British politics then understanding that what I'm saying isn't meant as a callous attack will be difficult. Your job may be of importance but if there are more people wanting to do it (for whatever reason) than positions available then your value decreases. That's free market economics mate, not my moral opinion.
-
I sort of agree with all that. My only caveats are, How many people that have been responsible have really made a career out of minimum wage jobs? I know loads of lads that are simply straight into work and graft types and they find their way off that bottom rung of the ladder easy enough. Minimum wage jobs are filled by students, people that don't need a higher income and immigrants from poorer countries. Minimum wage jobs are high turn over because they're supposed to be a step up and require no talent. Even having a minimum wage makes climbing further less appealing because that inflate
-
I agree and the same could be said of jobs that pay minimum wage. The choice is, fix social/political attitudes or carry on with the current ones of more tax and legislation to give the end result everyone thinks is right.
-
Exactly, which is what food banks are. People see that as a bad thing though. Something that is a sign of a decadent society. Letting people choose who to support is a bad bad thing. Much better we have the government take our money for such a valid cause......... so that they can f**k it away on something no one supports at a later date.
-
There isn't a functioning form of society that doesn't have people that need a hand, either through a bad turn of luck or irresponsible behaviour. Making food banks disappear doesn't mean that you have a better society. Lets have it right, food banks are voluntary charity for those that fall into the category above. The alternatives are either 'f**k the needy' or have the government force you to be charitable by taking your money.
-
The author of a book I read recently believed that the Cocker and Clumber were closely related and that the Clumber would most benefit from the infusion of Cocker blood because of that. f**k knows but your post reminded me of that....
-
It's re-branding of a bad idea.
-
Come over to the dark side, with me and WILF! Be an economic migrant! Well technically I am lol...we are English refugees in Wales, I get free prescriptions now 12.5% corporation tax........that will do nicely ! "TAX HAVEN! TAX HAVEN!.... Morally unjustifiable. You should feel ashamed!" LOL LOL
-
Cracking manifesto, seems reasonable, I'm in!
-
Do you have any grasp of the term relativity? LOL Yes mate, doh Then how come ya can't fathom that the ISS isn't high enough to get the diameter of the Earth in a single photo then? Like I said, do the math. We haven't had a camera far enough away for a single encompassing photo since the Apollo missions. For decades after Apollo all Earth picture were composites, until DSCOVR sent pics recently.
-
Do you have any grasp of the term relativity? LOL It ain't hard to do the math fella.
-
This thread is funny, lol it doesnt matter either way to me tbh. But the c**ts are getting billions upon billions for what? What i mean by proper is, why cant they from the iss grab a high resoloution camera an take a photograph, that pic you put up is not real. Lol this is going to be a good laugh this thread, were the fucks tb haha What do you mean it's not real? How can you say that, based on what? I've explained all of the things you think are suspicious. The ISS doesn't orbit high enough. They have pictures but not a single photo of the entire Earth because they ar
-
What do you mean 'real time'? There's no live pictures of the Earth because there's nothing far enough away in orbit to photograph it. But here's an example of a photograph from an occasion when there was. https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_329.html Not arguing either way mate, but if thats a real time pic, weres all the stars in background or one of the many tens of thousands of satelites, it is a bit fishy lol LOL, where's all the stars? You'll find the answer the same place as asking where's all the stars during the day. .....and satellites. Bloody he
-
What do you mean 'real time'? There's no live pictures of the Earth because there's nothing far enough away in orbit to photograph it. But here's an example of a photograph from an occasion when there was. https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_329.html Not arguing either way mate, but if thats a real time pic, weres all the stars in background or one of the many tens of thousands of satelites, it is a bit fishy lol LOL, where's all the stars? You'll find the answer the same place as asking where's all the stars during the day. .....and satellites. Blo
-
What do you mean 'real time'? There's no live pictures of the Earth because there's nothing far enough away in orbit to photograph it. But here's an example of a photograph from an occasion when there was. https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_329.html
-
Home Defense As The Founding Fathers Intended
Born Hunter replied to Wolfdog91's topic in General Talk
LOL, I'm not really disagreeing with ya. Part of the justification for 2A is to deter foreign invasion, for instance an attempt by the British to retake the colonies post independence, as you said. Also to keep the citizens free and able to defend their own properties from more minor assaults. It's an essential part of the American self sufficient frontiersman way as much as the bigger protection of democracy. I think it's hard to argue against any infringement in the 21stC but some of the justifications are still very valid and even the bigger ones of the protection of democracy I still s -
Home Defense As The Founding Fathers Intended
Born Hunter replied to Wolfdog91's topic in General Talk
They had tyrannical leaders in mind. 2A wasn't written to protect the fledgling USA from the British, it was written to protect the USA from the US Government. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It's a bit different today with the advances in weapons systems so the founding fathers would probably infringe on the right in the cases of cruise missile etc LOL but I think they'd still retain the right for the people to bear small arms for the purpose of maintaining effective Mil