Born Hunter
-
Content Count
17,883 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by Born Hunter
-
And honestly folks, I'm sure you all think I'm a right elitist c**t but all this is driven from the belief that I want to live as a free man, I don't want protecting from every little bad in the world, I don't want the government to take half my money and give me a shit sandwich back to save me having to make my own sandwich. No f****r knows what's best for me better than me and I'll not hold anyone else accountable for my mistakes. There are genuine cases out there of folks having a shitty run of luck and I accept that society should probably shoulder their burden. But I'll not shoulder a
-
Not from what I read constantly on this site and frankly coming out of every 'working man's' mouth. Haven't you heard? Apparently it's not the poor hard done by working man's fault for taking a loan that he can't manage, it's the lender's fault! See that's how society works now, we're not responsible for our own actions, it's every one else's fault. Makes perfect sense to me! Why do the British hate freedom and responsibility so much? I can see Labour having a landslide. It's straight out of their mantra. My nephew was made redundant. He has two kids. His rent was astronomical but
-
Define within their means? Not arguing but if you had to save up to buy it, no one I know could outright own anything The only lad in my circle flourishing has a grow in the loft Speaks volumes really It's easy to get self righteous about ordinary folk borrowing money, whilst forgetting most of us have mortgages & half the worlds run on borrowed money! Haha.... I dunno if I've misrepresented myself on this thread, but I agree with that entirely. I've had a bit of a moan about us 'poor' taking responsibility for our actions regarding credit but I've also said that credit used w
-
Not from what I read constantly on this site and frankly coming out of every 'working man's' mouth. Haven't you heard? Apparently it's not the poor hard done by working man's fault for taking a loan that he can't manage, it's the lender's fault! See that's how society works now, we're not responsible for our own actions, it's every one else's fault. Makes perfect sense to me! Why do the British hate freedom and responsibility so much? I can see Labour having a landslide. It's straight out of their mantra. So, were not having our local services cut, due to "austerity", bought about
-
Not from what I read constantly on this site and frankly coming out of every 'working man's' mouth. Haven't you heard? Apparently it's not the poor hard done by working man's fault for taking a loan that he can't manage, it's the lender's fault! See that's how society works now, we're not responsible for our own actions, it's every one else's fault. Makes perfect sense to me! Why do the British hate freedom and responsibility so much? I can see Labour having a landslide. It's straight out of their mantra.
-
Oh I'm on board with the plausibility of corruption mate. I don't deny reason just because I'm very skeptical of conspiracies. Simply for the reasons I have stated I find it hard to get behind the controlled demo one. The authors may indeed raise good points though.
-
Like I said maybe it was used before, you're focusing on a minor detail as I said "it's entirely possible someone used it". Maybe 'popularised' would make you happier? Indeed it would. I need my ducks in a row! You geologists are far to easy going. LOL
-
Is this comprehensive enough? http://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/nope_it_was_always_already_wrong
-
And ps the CIA did not invent the term 'conspiracy theory', it's reported to have been in use way before they were pushing it to discredit Kennedy assassination theorists.
-
Check anyone of those I posted all verified. I think it's nuts to unquestionably believe governments who always lie when they want to do something especially war. WMD was at very least a deliberate misuse of intelligence to go to war with a country, it led to hundreds of thousands of deaths. I know of them all already fella and have quoted them as recently as this lunch time! LOL. My teasing was in reference to the conspiracy you alluded to earlier which you 'dare not mention'. So, was I right?
-
Go on nik, say it.... 1969..... LOL
-
In some circles perhaps....
-
I was waiting for that to be mentioned. So in this theory the largest terror attack in modern history was orchestrated to make a bunch of rich folks a bit richer? And the Pentagon and the Pennsylvania planes were done in addition just for good measure? There are easier ways of turning over a few billion than that. Lets face it, IF you have the resources to carry out such an operation then surely it'd be simpler to manipulate the stock market with an attack on a pipeline or refinery? Tomorrow Never Dies style!
-
It is a hugely complex event, maybe more so than we think? I just can't accept such a simple explanation of wt7 collapsing through, what is historically speaking, not particularly crippling damage? A first & a last I reckon? That may well be the case, but in the absence of a conclusive answer I look for motive right, to see if the other aspects of the allegation adds any weight to it. Why would they take the risk of dropping WT7?
-
And why go to the trouble of doing 4 targets? Did the board of evil genius' at Langley not think just One trade tower would be sufficient in motivating the country to War?
-
Not to mention the fact you still have to make 2-4 commercial Airliners hit the targets! To fit in with the official cover up. Oh, unless they were cruise missiles with their well known hologram mode activated. LOL
-
I agree with all of that, why? why? why? I can't get my head round it & have no real conspiracy theory to back..... ...but? Haha......I just can't get it out of my head how those buildings would fall like that? That just coming from a simple minded guy like myself, but when you add hundreds of doubts from professionals with a structural background......it makes it hard to ignore? If we don't have a conclusive answer/explanation then it is unreasonable to rubbish any objective discussion on it. The authors may very well have raised valid points. The way I see it is that such
-
So here's the obvious problem with the controlled explosion 'theory'. You're a evil genius in the Bush administration with the strategic goal of invading a list of Middle Eastern states and decide the best way to do that is with a false flag operation. I can buy all that right, but here's my problem.... What's being suggested is that the buildings were rigged and demolished. Yet your strategic goal isn't to demolish the buildings, it's to create national outrage and the will to fight a series of wars. So why the f**k would you choose such a tactically risky way of achieving that? Why would
-
Yeah but that's only about 24 in lizard years.
-
I get what you're saying. I just find it difficult to have sympathy for anyone that cops out for their own lack of due diligence, shall we say. Credit and debt are great tools for folks savvy enough to use them. I struggle to get on board with wanting to regulate anything frankly, particularly to protect people that can't be arsed to take responsibility for their actions. I don't know anybody that is genuinely a victim so I would hate to just generalise for the sake of those genuine few. The folks I do know seem to think they 'deserve' a certain standard of living and that credit is like r
-
Fair doos, I think I'll end up the same way with this pup. His first priority has to be bird work, but I do a bit of all sorts and don't like having a shit load of dogs about to be specialists for all those jobs. Even at heel, spaniels can be a bit 'busy', not quite as slow and focused as say a lab or GWP and all that white will perhaps add to make me a bit more visible, maybe not. In which case, if the pup turns out useful but at times a hindrance then he'll be left in the truck when appropriate. I'm just f***ing about really, see what happens.... It's cool you're using a lurcher. I bet t
-
Tracking dog, is to find shot game "after" it has been shot. Tracking is just another string in ya dogs bow. I get that, lol, as I said it was a bit of a tangent. I guess my comment really was that we read a lot about stalkers having tracking dogs and hardly anything about them using their 'tracking dogs' for the far more regularly occurring job of actually indicating to the stalker what is just over the rise or through all those trees. Not knocking anyone either. I've got a young cocker coming on for typical spaniel work but he walks to heel sensibly enough and so I'm taking him o
-
Which hunt and why they getting pissy about the hunt? It's true some hunt staff are being trained up as contractors, just like any other qualified rural worker nominated. It's not like the red coats are going to be chasing badgers with twelve and a half couple as part of the cull! LOL. Hardly the fecking hunts fault is it!
-
I'm no expert and this is a little bit of a tangent so please forgive me. Isn't the main use of an experienced stalking dog actually for before the shot is even taken? Walking 'to heel' just a couple yards in front winding while you are watching? Able to give that indication that game is close before you quite have a line of sight. Not sure I could justify training a dog specifically and solely for following up but for the above sounds great fun.
-
You don't have to be old to be that boring. I'm presenting a paper this Summer! Hahaha! I expect you'll all be Attending?
