Reform U.K…….

[Borr 7,979]

I think Lucy Connelly will be signing up ....she's also at the march next weekend I believe 

[mel b 3,745]

2 hours ago, Greyman said:

What a nationalist and patriot I think he should have led the Tory’s and we may not of got this bad jmho of course 

I just can't stand him , he makes my skin crawl.  He'd see the likes of us as pond scum.

[gnasher16 31,558]

4 hours ago, mackay said:

Am I wrong or is it all tories who lost their seats that are joining reform?.  I'd be more inclined to trust an elected tory just now who joined rather than the ones kicked out and unlikely to get back in as tories.

Joining a party run by a man who's career ambition is to run the Tory party,well theres a surprise !

[FLATTOP 5,254]

Nadine Dorries suggesting Nigel Farage does a pact with Boris Johnson to save Great Britain she is so far up Boris Johnson’s arse she wears a plank across her back to stop her falling in, it only took her a day FFS.

[ditchman 3,486]

45 minutes ago, FLATTOP said:

Nadine Dorries suggesting Nigel Farage does a pact with Boris Johnson to save Great Britain she is so far up Boris Johnson’s arse she wears a plank across her back to stop her falling in, it only took her a day FFS.

thank god im not the only one to notice that...........................if it has tits or tyres you just know its going to be trouble

[Borr 7,979]

9 hours ago, gnasher16 said:

Joining a party run by a man who's career ambition is to run the Tory party,well theres a surprise !

I don't think he has any ambition to run the conservative party. Why would he? In the past maybe I don't know, but I think he's fairly aware of the public distrust/dislike of the labour and conservative lot especially whilst surrounded by reform, I also imagine an added bonus of defectors is it's a knife in the side of the Tory party who shunned or mocked him. Boris had enough chances and I'd imagine he has a few regrets he should've kept his missus out of it and put people before party a bit more. 

[ditchman 3,486]

4 minutes ago, Borr said:

I don't think he has any ambition to run the conservative party. Why would he? In the past maybe I don't know, but I think he's fairly aware of the public distrust/dislike of the labour and conservative lot especially whilst surrounded by reform, I also imagine an added bonus of defectors is it's a knife in the side of the Tory party who shunned or mocked him. Boris had enough chances and I'd imagine he has a few regrets he should've kept his missus out of it and put people before party a bit more. 

Princess Nut Nut.........lol

[mackay 3,644]

Farage will get one shot at it, that's a guarantee. People are so pissed off with politicians now there's no mileage left in them. If he fcuks up he'll be ditched just as quickly. He must be gambling that ex tories joining and pissing people off has more benefit than telling them to do one. He better be right in that. I'm not a great fan of Farage, I'm looking at the bigger picture and he better feckin deliver.

[WILF 50,450]

Nadine Dorries is the straw that broke the camels back for me……f**k the lot of them, we will get a better turn out if it all just go’s badly wrong now. 

Edited 7 hours ago by WILF

[mackay 3,644]

3 minutes ago, WILF said:

Nadine Dorries is the straw that broke the camels back for me……f**k the lot of them, we will get a better turn out if it all just go’s badly wrong now. 

I can see the benefit of accepting some tories that were disillusioned and had nothing in common with the modern day tory party. Just like the biggest majority of reform voters were tory voters before. Nadine Dorres  though?, should have been told to do one.

[.357shooter 1,380]

if reform are the party to change the uk for the better no other mp,s from any other party should have been accepted.shows the system for what it is.serious question if all poiticians do not work for the bennifit of the country why do we have them ?.all they do is take away our freedoms and give the brown army all they have taken from us.

Edited 4 hours ago by .357shooter

[WILF 50,450]

25 minutes ago, mackay said:

I can see the benefit of accepting some tories that were disillusioned and had nothing in common with the modern day tory party. Just like the biggest majority of reform voters were tory voters before. Nadine Dorres  though?, should have been told to do one.

Dorries is a measure of the reality of what reform have become (or were all along, who knows ?)…….we can’t keep kidding ourselves on, they were a hope but we have to believe our eyes and say that’s another hope down the drain. 
 

Maybe I’ve not been paying attention but have Reform been as vocal lately about leaving the ECHR ?……because I think that’s all gone a bit quiet ?…..but maybe it hasn’t ? 
 

The “600,000” number mentioned in the deportations plan (that won’t work until a lot of legal barriers have been torn down) is a number so meaningless in the scale of our problems and so un-ambitious that’s it’s irrelevant……it’s fodder for the hard of thinking !

Its like when people keep talking about “legal” and “illegal” migration…..like there is a relevant difference ?

The difference between legal and illegal anything is a sheet of paper……does anyone here think a sheet a paper solves our problems ?

Do we think a sheet of paper makes Bradford or Birmingham or London not Bradford or Birmingham or London ?

Same for the 600,000 number, it solves nothing….as in, we ain’t one step further forward !

What we will be voting for now by the looks of it is nothing !, zero !, zilch !…..the same things, the same words spoken by many of the same people !

f**k that, not again…..never again ! 

[tatsblisters 10,972]

15 minutes ago, WILF said:

Dorries is a measure of the reality of what reform have become (or were all along, who knows ?)…….we can’t keep kidding ourselves on, they were a hope but we have to believe our eyes and say that’s another hope down the drain. 
 

Maybe I’ve not been paying attention but have Reform been as vocal lately about leaving the ECHR ?……because I think that’s all gone a bit quiet ?…..but maybe it hasn’t ? 
 

The “600,000” number mentioned in the deportations plan (that won’t work until a lot of legal barriers have been torn down) is a number so meaningless in the scale of our problems and so un-ambitious that’s it’s irrelevant……it’s fodder for the hard of thinking !

Its like when people keep talking about “legal” and “illegal” migration…..like there is a relevant difference ?

The difference between legal and illegal anything is a sheet of paper……does anyone here think a sheet a paper solves our problems ?

Do we think a sheet of paper makes Bradford or Birmingham or London not Bradford or Birmingham or London ?

Same for the 600,000 number, it solves nothing….as in, we ain’t one step further forward !

What we will be voting for now by the looks of it is nothing !, zero !, zilch !…..the same things, the same words spoken by many of the same people !

f**k that, not again…..never again ! 

I've come to the conclusion it's about securing a well paid job that we the tax payer pays their wages. As the old saying goes it's money for old rope for most of them.

[chartpolski 28,078]

3 hours ago, WILF said:

Dorries is a measure of the reality of what reform have become (or were all along, who knows ?)…….we can’t keep kidding ourselves on, they were a hope but we have to believe our eyes and say that’s another hope down the drain. 
 

Maybe I’ve not been paying attention but have Reform been as vocal lately about leaving the ECHR ?……because I think that’s all gone a bit quiet ?…..but maybe it hasn’t ? 
 

The “600,000” number mentioned in the deportations plan (that won’t work until a lot of legal barriers have been torn down) is a number so meaningless in the scale of our problems and so un-ambitious that’s it’s irrelevant……it’s fodder for the hard of thinking !

Its like when people keep talking about “legal” and “illegal” migration…..like there is a relevant difference ?

The difference between legal and illegal anything is a sheet of paper……does anyone here think a sheet a paper solves our problems ?

Do we think a sheet of paper makes Bradford or Birmingham or London not Bradford or Birmingham or London ?

Same for the 600,000 number, it solves nothing….as in, we ain’t one step further forward !

What we will be voting for now by the looks of it is nothing !, zero !, zilch !…..the same things, the same words spoken by many of the same people !

f**k that, not again…..never again ! 

Wilf, in Farages conference speech he said we will leave the ECHR on day one.

Cheers.

[Greyman 31,946]

If reform win they need experienced mps to fill seats in big numbers so I don’t think they have a choice about taking the jumpers, any of the other right wing parties would find themselves in the same position if they got anywhere near an election win