Jump to content

September 11Th


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I don't believe for one second that the US government would do anything like that to its own people but I can see clearly that ALL western governments exploited this terrible act for their own ends.

The one thing that sticks in my mind is the look on the faces of the firemen that were sent in to that building minutes before it collapsed, they were heroes, they knew they were the death watch but s

We have went to war and invaded countries for a lot less.  No need to wipe out there firemen and a building on the prefix for an invasion. A car bomb in the street would have done if that was the

Posted Images

17 hours ago, The one said:

I think it was like the world war , it really woke America up to terrism 

Ffs America has been awake to terrorism for decades as they,ve been funding it, including 19 years of funding bin laden to fight the Russians and countless years of ira funding to kill the English to name but a few examples

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On that day it was a tragedy with the loss of so many innocent lives however there are so many discrepancies with the Official Story with so much more info coming to light in the years since that simply do not tie in with the official report on 911. Three skyscrapers can not collapse in Free Fall with the last one of them not even touched by anything,the same building that was also announced to have fallen by a CNN reporter despite still standing for a few minutes after her announcement before actually collapsing. There are so many discrepancies being brought to light now by organisations like the Truth Movement and from former fire fighters at the scene even architects and other scholars who have raised issues that can not be explained away,even down to people who are now dying from inhaling all the dust/debris from the cloud after the buildings collapsed which has been found to be saturated with Thermite an explosive used in building demolition . Even down to the "let's roll" phonecalls from flight 93 which were allegedly made at a height that can still not be made today. Just months before the attacks on the world trade centre the lease was privatised and sold to Larry Silverstein. Silverstein took out an Insurance Policy that fortuitously also covered terrorism. After the 911 atttacks Silverstein took the Insurance Company to court,claiming he should be paid double because there were two attacks. Silverstein won and walked away with over $4.5 billion . Silvestein bought the Towers with $15 million of his own money and $100 million from his backers.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/unanswered-questions-the-mystery-of-flight-93-173206.html

https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

http://aa911.org/

http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/

http://www.stj911.org/

https://www.mintpressnews.com/911-larry-silverstein-designed-new-wtc-7-one-year-attacks/214821/

 

Edited by MickC
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MickC said:

On that day it was a tragedy with the loss of so many innocent lives however three skyscrapers can not collapse in Free Fall with the last one of them not even touched by anything,the same building that was also announced to have fallen by a CNN reporter despite still standing for a few minutes after her announcement before actually collapsing. There are so many discrepancies being brought to light now by organisations like the Truth Movement and from former fire fighters at the scene even architects and other scholars who have raised issues that can not be explained away,even down to people who are now dying from inhaling all the dust/debris from the cloud after the buildings collapsed which has been found to be saturated with Thermite an explosive used in building demolition . Even down to the "let's roll" phonecalls from flight 93 which were allegedly made at a height that can still not be made today.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/unanswered-questions-the-mystery-of-flight-93-173206.html

https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

http://aa911.org/

http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/

http://www.stj911.org/

 

Without even interrogating that stuff properly I can point out one mistruth you claim immediately. WT7 was damaged, badly! Pictures even posted on this thread iirc.

In my experience all of it has reasonable explanations when you start digging.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/09/2017 at 16:12, ChrisJones said:

 

It was very badly damaged, mate. The southwest corner was demolished from the ground to the eighteenth floor taking several support columns and a diesel fire, from the backup generators, burned for several hours further weakening the remaining supports.

 

From NYPD..

 

swcornerdamage.jpg

 

The firefighters reported that the building began to 'bulge' between what was left of the 10th and 13th floors and they evacuated when the building began to sag.

 

From NIST...

 

82ed4f992152.jpg

 

The conspiracy says that there was a controlled explosion. There is no evidence at all to support that. Not a trace has been found. The conspiracy says that a diesel fire cannot melt steel. That is correct but it can weaken the steel significantly. When you combine a seven hour fire with the remaining structural failures you're left with a collapse.

 

 

 

 

See above! :laugh:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could go back and forth all day but the fact still remains that three buildings came down in Free Fall and that can not and does not tie in with the official explanation of 911. A skyscrapers main strength is the concrete core which houses the lift shafts etc and this is also the core which the rest of the building ties into,it's designed this way to cope with any foreseeable external damage to the building. There is enough info available for both sides of the argument to rage on for years to come and no doubt it will but the fact remains that more and more evidence is coming to light to doubt the official report of 911.

Edited by MickC
Link to post
Share on other sites

To this day I still think  the heat from the plane on impact and the sheer weight of the building above the crash zone all contributed to the collapse off the tower. 

I believe  the American security services knew something big was coming but just did not have the details to stop it. 

Governments can be pretty  ruthless and the Americans can be one of the worst when it suits but, there's no way (in my view)  that they would of gone to those depths, killing they're own :nono:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone been to ground zero? 

I was there before Xmas last year and to me it felt very real, Hearing the fone calls left on people's voicemails was the worse. And seeing the damage to fire trucks an the massive steel beams torn in half was fairly moving moment one I will never forget. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rat face said:

Anyone been to ground zero? 

I was there before Xmas last year and to me it felt very real, Hearing the fone calls left on people's voicemails was the worse. And seeing the damage to fire trucks an the massive steel beams torn in half was fairly moving moment one I will never forget. 

The museum and memorial are so much more meaningful and impactful being at ground zero too I found. Standing amongst skyscrapers helps a bit to put it in perspective.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

We have went to war and invaded countries for a lot less. 

No need to wipe out there firemen and a building on the prefix for an invasion. A car bomb in the street would have done if that was there intention. 

I like millions of others saw the reason why those towers fell and have seen /read anything else to convince me otherwise.

Did they capatalise after the fact of course they did. 

Did they know it was going to happen that very day to those particular target's no they didn't.

Did they receive intel that planes could be used in this manner yes they did. 

Complacency and "won't happen to us" thinking was a factor.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said Scot. :thumbs:

The evidence is there for anyone who wants to trawl through it. Enough to turn me from a conspiracy theorist, anyway. I believe this far along there is no evidence enough for those that don't want to believe it was a tragic chain of events. There is simply no way to convince them otherwise. That being said I'd love to see actual hard evidence of a conspiracy. I'll wait...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...