Jump to content

What Does Being British Mean To You?


Recommended Posts

Potato famine. lol

 

Sorry Jonjon79......you put Irish and British in the same sentence there. You must have made a typo.

Most people in Britain have no idea what the famine was or what it actually meant.

A million + starved to death and the same again having to emigrate.......they dont know about any of that.

It means nothing if you don't explain mate ;)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 250
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

To me it's the indomitable spirit in the face of adversity where we Brits historically come to our own.   The Battle Of Britain fighter pilots outnumbered 4-1 but still went up every day and fought

The best thing about being British is that you dont have to be American.

Being British to me is walking and hunting the lad my grandparents did,drinking the same Ale in the same pubs they did.Visiting every corner of our Isle and exploring the fauna and flora.Having the ha

Posted Images

so i will ask the un answered question again,,,,what about those people with mixed ethinc back ground ,,,at what point in the dilution,,to they become british??

If you cross a Larbrador with a Poodle at what point in the dilution does it become a pure Labrador ?......the real answer is never it will always be a mongrel.

 

The trick is to convince as many people as possible that a " Labradoodle " is infact a new pure breed............hence this new human breed we hear called " mixed race ".

Edited by gnasher16
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the potatoe blight not effect main land Britain as it did Ireland. Also why would they not know the history. It was a part of the British Isles history.

At j

Can only speak for myself but our history classes in school were crap. Nothing about modern history just about castles etc

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

so i will ask the un answered question again,,,,what about those people with mixed ethinc back ground ,,,at what point in the dilution,,to they become british??

If you cross a Larbrador with a Poodle at what point in the dilution does it become a pure Labrador ?......the real answer is never it will always be a mongrel.

 

The trick is to convince as many people as possible that a " Labradoodle " is infact a new pure breed............hence this new human breed we hear called " mixed race ".

 

 

my point is gnash,,,,there are many people out there with a none white ansester,,,very often in the old days covered up,,,so you might have someone with a great great grand parant thats black or asian,,,,it wouldnt stop you being english....there were lots that came back from the colonies with a half cast kid back in the 18th and 19th century .....and also lets be mindfull,,,that most of us are unable to trace our family history back much further than the 18th century,,,and even if we can,,,its just a name on paper,,,no pics so you can see what they look like

 

i dowt theres any breed of dog out there gnash without somthing else in its make up,,,so thats not the best analogy ,,,

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

the welsh are the true pure Britons according to research .scientists were able to trace there dna back to the first tribes to that settle in the british isles after the last ice age over 10,000 years ago

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

so i will ask the un answered question again,,,,what about those people with mixed ethinc back ground ,,,at what point in the dilution,,to they become british??

If you cross a Larbrador with a Poodle at what point in the dilution does it become a pure Labrador ?......the real answer is never it will always be a mongrel.

 

The trick is to convince as many people as possible that a " Labradoodle " is infact a new pure breed............hence this new human breed we hear called " mixed race ".

 

 

my point is gnash,,,,there are many people out there with a none white ansester,,,very often in the old days covered up,,,so you might have someone with a great great grand parant thats black or asian,,,,it wouldnt stop you being english....there were lots that came back from the colonies with a half cast kid back in the 18th and 19th century .....and also lets be mindfull,,,that most of us are unable to trace our family history back much further than the 18th century,,,and even if we can,,,its just a name on paper,,,no pics so you can see what they look like

 

i dowt theres any breed of dog out there gnash without somthing else in its make up,,,so thats not the best analogy ,,,

 

 

:good:

 

Fact is it's f***ing hard to define any biological population precisely so saying 'pure this and pure that' has to be taken with the understanding that it's a bit of a fuzzy topic.

 

Now apparently I've got a bit of Mediterranean blood in me, Spanish/Italian/Greece, only a bit but I'd hardly class them as the same as what I would consider 'pure' English. So I'm not English? Bollocks, any race or sub species or whatever isn't a precisely identifiable thing. It's a collection of individuals that on average are identifiably different to other groups. On the individual level there is mixing with other races/subspecies that is folded back into the core of the population. Like in the historical examples you have given and like in the example of myself. This can happen at geographical 'contact zones' or through historical migration/raiding/trading etc.

 

The term 'pure' is a bit of a slippery one.

Edited by Born Hunter
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

so i will ask the un answered question again,,,,what about those people with mixed ethinc back ground ,,,at what point in the dilution,,to they become british??

If you cross a Larbrador with a Poodle at what point in the dilution does it become a pure Labrador ?......the real answer is never it will always be a mongrel.

 

The trick is to convince as many people as possible that a " Labradoodle " is infact a new pure breed............hence this new human breed we hear called " mixed race ".

 

 

my point is gnash,,,,there are many people out there with a none white ansester,,,very often in the old days covered up,,,so you might have someone with a great great grand parant thats black or asian,,,,it wouldnt stop you being english....there were lots that came back from the colonies with a half cast kid back in the 18th and 19th century .....and also lets be mindfull,,,that most of us are unable to trace our family history back much further than the 18th century,,,and even if we can,,,its just a name on paper,,,no pics so you can see what they look like

 

i dowt theres any breed of dog out there gnash without somthing else in its make up,,,so thats not the best analogy ,,,

 

 

:good:

 

Fact is it's f***ing hard to define any biological population precisely so saying 'pure this and pure that' has to be taken with the understanding that it's a bit of a fuzzy topic.

 

Now apparently I've got a bit of Mediterranean blood in me, Spanish/Italian/Greece, only a bit but I'd hardly class them as the same as what I would consider 'pure' English. So I'm not English? Bollocks, any race or sub species or whatever isn't a precisely identifiable thing. It's a collection of individuals that on average are identifiably different to other groups. On the individual level there is mixing with other races/subspecies that is folded back into the core of the population. Like in the historical examples you have given and like in the example of myself. This can happen at geographical 'contact zones' or through historical migration/raiding/trading etc.

 

The term 'pure' is a bit of a slippery one.

 

that's very true we are a mongrel nation your Mediterranean blood might have come from the romans who surprisingly did not leave a big dna fingerprint on Britain considering they were here for 400 years same with the Vikings but a lot of Britons are made up of French dna from before the norman conquest

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

so i will ask the un answered question again,,,,what about those people with mixed ethinc back ground ,,,at what point in the dilution,,to they become british??

If you cross a Larbrador with a Poodle at what point in the dilution does it become a pure Labrador ?......the real answer is never it will always be a mongrel.

 

The trick is to convince as many people as possible that a " Labradoodle " is infact a new pure breed............hence this new human breed we hear called " mixed race ".

 

 

my point is gnash,,,,there are many people out there with a none white ansester,,,very often in the old days covered up,,,so you might have someone with a great great grand parant thats black or asian,,,,it wouldnt stop you being english....there were lots that came back from the colonies with a half cast kid back in the 18th and 19th century .....and also lets be mindfull,,,that most of us are unable to trace our family history back much further than the 18th century,,,and even if we can,,,its just a name on paper,,,no pics so you can see what they look like

 

i dowt theres any breed of dog out there gnash without somthing else in its make up,,,so thats not the best analogy ,,,

 

 

:good:

 

Fact is it's f***ing hard to define any biological population precisely so saying 'pure this and pure that' has to be taken with the understanding that it's a bit of a fuzzy topic.

 

Now apparently I've got a bit of Mediterranean blood in me, Spanish/Italian/Greece, only a bit but I'd hardly class them as the same as what I would consider 'pure' English. So I'm not English? Bollocks, any race or sub species or whatever isn't a precisely identifiable thing. It's a collection of individuals that on average are identifiably different to other groups. On the individual level there is mixing with other races/subspecies that is folded back into the core of the population. Like in the historical examples you have given and like in the example of myself. This can happen at geographical 'contact zones' or through historical migration/raiding/trading etc.

 

The term 'pure' is a bit of a slippery one.

 

that's very true we are a mongrel nation your Mediterranean blood might have come from the romans who surprisingly did not leave a big dna fingerprint on Britain considering they were here for 400 years same with the Vikings but a lot of Britons are made up of French dna from before the norman conquest

 

 

Yeah maybe or maybe it's just from some great great great great (etc) grandparent of mixed med' blood who travelled here on a trade ship or durring a war.

 

Interestingly the majority of my blood is West European and Scandinavian.

 

Point I'm getting at, as you know, is that it's all a bit statistical, race isn't as quantifiable as some would have you believe. That's not to say I follow the modern mantra of "race is a social construct" because plainly that is bollocks.

Edited by Born Hunter
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

so i will ask the un answered question again,,,,what about those people with mixed ethinc back ground ,,,at what point in the dilution,,to they become british??

If you cross a Larbrador with a Poodle at what point in the dilution does it become a pure Labrador ?......the real answer is never it will always be a mongrel.

 

The trick is to convince as many people as possible that a " Labradoodle " is infact a new pure breed............hence this new human breed we hear called " mixed race ".

 

 

my point is gnash,,,,there are many people out there with a none white ansester,,,very often in the old days covered up,,,so you might have someone with a great great grand parant thats black or asian,,,,it wouldnt stop you being english....there were lots that came back from the colonies with a half cast kid back in the 18th and 19th century .....and also lets be mindfull,,,that most of us are unable to trace our family history back much further than the 18th century,,,and even if we can,,,its just a name on paper,,,no pics so you can see what they look like

 

i dowt theres any breed of dog out there gnash without somthing else in its make up,,,so thats not the best analogy ,,,

 

 

:good:

 

Fact is it's f***ing hard to define any biological population precisely so saying 'pure this and pure that' has to be taken with the understanding that it's a bit of a fuzzy topic.

 

Now apparently I've got a bit of Mediterranean blood in me, Spanish/Italian/Greece, only a bit but I'd hardly class them as the same as what I would consider 'pure' English. So I'm not English? Bollocks, any race or sub species or whatever isn't a precisely identifiable thing. It's a collection of individuals that on average are identifiably different to other groups. On the individual level there is mixing with other races/subspecies that is folded back into the core of the population. Like in the historical examples you have given and like in the example of myself. This can happen at geographical 'contact zones' or through historical migration/raiding/trading etc.

 

The term 'pure' is a bit of a slippery one.

 

that's very true we are a mongrel nation your Mediterranean blood might have come from the romans who surprisingly did not leave a big dna fingerprint on Britain considering they were here for 400 years same with the Vikings but a lot of Britons are made up of French dna from before the norman conquest

 

 

Yeah maybe or maybe it's just from some great great great great (etc) grandparent of mixed med' blood who travelled here on a trade ship or durring a war.

 

Interestingly the majority of my blood is West European and Scandinavian.

 

Point I'm getting at, as you know, is that it's all a bit statistical, race isn't as quantifiable as some would have you believe. That's not to say I follow the modern mantra of "race is a social construct" because plainly that is bollocks.

 

 

absolutely :thumbs:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

Being British means nothing to me, a person of Asian or African decent can be British, I am English, and proud of the fact.

No they can't, they can be a British Citizen/Passport holder that isn't the same thing.

 

If I go to China with my wife and we have a child, would that child be Chinese? Can I be African or Indian? No no no.

 

This is why these questions of Britishness are so utterly pointless, if we cannot give the answer than makes the most sense then it doesn't mean anything.

 

If you and your wife moved to china and while living there had a kid then he would be chinese .

I doubt any Chinese person would take that seriously

so there is no such thing as white Americans or white australians
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...