ChrisJones 7,975 Posted July 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2015 (edited) Can't complain chris, so what's your thoughts on it, enough to convince yourself mate? Yeah pal watched it, what you think? Not on the basis of that one video, alone. At this point it's entertainment. I can clearly see what appears to be a woman, in what appear to be period clothing, walking away from the camera. Really? "Clearly" and "what appears to be" in the same line is contradictory in itself. I can clearly see a moving image. It appears to be a woman in period clothing. Does that clarify it enough? Edited July 13, 2015 by ChrisJones 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MIK 4,763 Posted July 13, 2015 Report Share Posted July 13, 2015 I watched this one the other day 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted July 13, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2015 MIK that's a good one! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lab 10,979 Posted July 14, 2015 Report Share Posted July 14, 2015 I watched this one the other day Hmmmmm........does John not like to turn the lights on?.....lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted July 14, 2015 Report Share Posted July 14, 2015 Fake Multiple exposure of the same image, why on earth does the picture start to shake when the apparition appears? convenient eh? Because the cameraman is 5hitting himself - he's just seen a ghost ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 30,055 Posted July 14, 2015 Report Share Posted July 14, 2015 "Motion detected-recording" would an ethereal entity trigger a motion-detector 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lurcherman 887 13,445 Posted July 14, 2015 Report Share Posted July 14, 2015 Didnt watch it francie pal Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted July 14, 2015 Report Share Posted July 14, 2015 I watched this one the other day Hmmmmm........does John not like to turn the lights on?.....lol Didn't see the entity till the end lab, feck, do you think it's real, I mean not staged? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MoChara 1,632 Posted July 14, 2015 Report Share Posted July 14, 2015 Did yous not read the story attached? It says it's been *edited* to look scarier, including the shaking of the camera. Read the small print guys Quote Link to post Share on other sites
northern lad 2,292 Posted July 14, 2015 Report Share Posted July 14, 2015 Don't know about ghostly but Ive seen some truly ghastly sights behind the Ritz on many a Saturday night Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted July 14, 2015 Report Share Posted July 14, 2015 You can never tell with all the modern editing software available what is real and what isn't, but an easy way to work it out is to remember that ghosts don't exist, so these films are either faked on purpose or can be explained by less "other worldly" means. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kay 3,709 Posted July 14, 2015 Report Share Posted July 14, 2015 Looked like a flash of light & then what appeared to be a female in Edwardian dress walking with her back to the cctv camera to me ..... I can see what looks like a white high neck collar & dark long dress , hair up like they wore it back then .... I love looking at stuff like this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mickey Finn 3,087 Posted July 14, 2015 Report Share Posted July 14, 2015 (edited) "Motion detected-recording" would an ethereal entity trigger a motion-detector You can google ghosts on game camera's and see quite of few that have set of the camera's. Here's one you can't deny is real. Edited July 14, 2015 by Mickey Finn 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
leegreen 2,254 Posted July 14, 2015 Report Share Posted July 14, 2015 Can't complain chris, so what's your thoughts on it, enough to convince yourself mate? Yeah pal watched it, what you think? Not on the basis of that one video, alone. At this point it's entertainment. I can clearly see what appears to be a woman, in what appear to be period clothing, walking away from the camera. Really? "Clearly" and "what appears to be" in the same line is contradictory in itself. I can clearly see a moving image. It appears to be a woman in period clothing. Does that clarify it enough? But you didn't say that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted July 17, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2015 But you didn't say that. Okay... So what's your point? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.