Accip74
-
Content Count
7,725 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
21
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by Accip74
-
Not too sure but if the bloke was flying his owl everyday for an hour or two this means the owl would be on the same block for the remaining 22-23 hours in a day, surely the owl would develop foot problems before too long?I never free loft my bird when flying it, when ive flown for the day my bird goes on its high perch, with a bath next to it, at night I put it away on a bow till next morning, the only time its free lofted is when my season is over, are you saying this is wrong? the only time a bird will develop foot problems is by using the wrong perching material or perch, I hate seeing fal
-
I see he's got high hopes for his daughter......haha
-
A lovely way to spend time.........just another one of many to add to the list of 'things to do' when the kids are older :-)
-
I guess there's less fear of prosecution when you're a Mason....haha
-
I bet he does a great Joe Pecsi impression....
-
What were you digging mudcat?
-
His type are all the same.....dont agree with his views and he'll get all nasty and start shouting There's a few on here like that.....haha
-
I think a good old moan on regular basis prevents the odd random murder tbh......
-
Corbyn won't last too long.....he's novel & interesting at the moment to the media & general public alike, a good story........he isn't going to be a threat to Britain, just his own political career & the labour party...... He won't get the chance to be a serious threat to Britain............a lot of fuss over nothing I reckon. That shadow cabinet appointment of Kerry McCarthy is fcuking hilarious imo
-
You'll still find time.....haha...
-
......I always preferred Tim Brook Taylor.....
-
How Do I Delete Messages In In Box?
Accip74 replied to whitefeet4190's topic in Lurchers & Running Dogs
Click on a conversation you've had & there should be a big red box above, saying 'delete'..... -
.......& the Goodies were shite....
-
Not to be petty but you,ve said it twice now......since when was WTC 7 one of the biggest buildings in America it was about 50 floors if im not wrong. Certainly not by height, but area volume, I think.............it was very big mate haha.....
-
A successful dig blaise.........keep up the posts!
-
Are you sure about that? Didn't the FEMA report finding the cause of the collapse inconclusive lead to the more substantial NIST investigation being authorised? http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_meetings.cfm Apparently in the initial report, I'm denying is was reported on Okay, well I'm not going to waste my days looking into it so I'll take your word for it in good faith. Following on from that, my next thought is 'so what?'..... It didn't go un-investigated or unreported. So what if the initial report concentrated exclusively on the primary events of that attack? It's n
-
In all fairnous this one is easy explainable they said pull it as in pull out the firemen and get out the building not pull it for explosives you think they would go to the effort of rigging it up with explosives which would of been done prior to attacks then admit to everyone they where going to pull itYes it can easily be interpreted that way, but John Kerry doesn't use the same words or in the same context......It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 st
-
Are you sure about that? Didn't the FEMA report finding the cause of the collapse inconclusive lead to the more substantial NIST investigation being authorised? http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_meetings.cfm Apparently in the initial report, I'm denying is wasn't reported on at all
-
In all fairnous this one is easy explainable they said pull it as in pull out the firemen and get out the building not pull it for explosives you think they would go to the effort of rigging it up with explosives which would of been done prior to attacks then admit to everyone they where going to pull itYes it can easily be interpreted that way, but John Kerry doesn't use the same words or in the same context......It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 st
-
Anyway.......I'll stop there, we know these sites are watched by the authorities & I'm sure I've just seen a blacked out limo cruise slowly past my house....haha....
-
In all fairnous this one is easy explainable they said pull it as in pull out the firemen and get out the building not pull it for explosives you think they would go to the effort of rigging it up with explosives which would of been done prior to attacks then admit to everyone they where going to pull itYes it can easily be interpreted that way, but John Kerry doesn't use the same words or in the same context......It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 st
-
I don't know mate, I'm just pointing out there's some use of basic English, that in all honestly can be interpreted how you want, especially if you're a mad conspiracist haha.......but it doesn't compute as 'structural failing' to me...
-
Sounds like it's worth taking up that invite then
-
Were they using dogs mush?
-
Larry Silverstien talking about the collapse of wtc7. John Kerry said when asked about the collapse of wtc7 ".......it was done in a controlled way" Any plausible explanation for these contradictions to the official report? I mean obviously they're mistaken (haha), but why?
