Jump to content

shaaark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    14,966

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Everything posted by shaaark

  1. shaaark
    FACT ?
  2. shaaark
    Don't matter, not good around children, and vicious = INSTANT CULL!! ?
  3. shaaark
    Sad thing is though phil, especially these days, there are plenty of people exactly like this
  4. shaaark
    Just googled them. Pretty nice, look like the falcons ?
  5. shaaark
    That about sums it up really, and what a few of us have been saying. That's me done ?
  6. shaaark
    ? ............. ? Oh dear, you actually believe what you write. Fury as technical a boxer as khan or mayweather?! Hehehe ?
  7. shaaark
    You do know that there are 17 weight divisions in pro boxing? Fury being the best boxer on the planet?! ?. So he's a better boxer than khan, canelo, crawford, lomachenko, mayweather etc etc etc...... take your dogs for a walk mate, clear your head . And don't try to worm your way out by saying 'I meant heavyweight', you said ' best boxer on the planet' .......... FACT . ............. ? lol
  8. shaaark
    Don't know about the fights that fans really want to see. I don't think most fight fans really give two fucks about the heavyweight division at present. As I've said, it's been shit the last few years, and with only the likes of wilder, fury, allen, joyce etc, they aint exactly getting everyone talking, like some suggest on here. Easily the worst era for heavyweights
  9. shaaark
    You obviously a fury fan brookie. Fact is tyson fury 'might' be the best of a pretty average bunch of a about 10 heavyweights worldwide. Pretty shit really, don't care how much of a fan of certain boxers people are. Wilder been fighting no-one of note, and he supposed to be the hardest punching heavyweight, says who?! And he put fury down twice. Fury supposed to be so quick and elusive, again, against who?!
  10. shaaark
    Both lost, so it was a draw? ?. ............. ?
  11. shaaark
    ? ? c**t should've been burnt to death
  12. shaaark
    Talking about good heavyweight fights, to be honest, I'm looking forward to whyte v chisora again on the 22nd. The first fight was far more entertaining than wilder v fury, and if this one goes the same way I'll be more than happy to watch it.
  13. shaaark
    ? FACT ............. LOL ?
  14. shaaark
    Great weren't he?!! Lol, just goes to disprove the theory of 'you don't win an olympic gold if you're no good'. ?.......... He was f***ing SHITE!!
  15. shaaark
    As above lads, anyone got one, know anyone that has, and they any good?
  16. shaaark
    Sort of agree with you here, joshua has been over hyped since winning his olympic medal
  17. shaaark
    Well this is a fact, joshua, wilder or fury, are FAR from being the best heavyweights. Fury beat klitshko, joshua beat klitshko, but they beat a man that was past it, and all but retired. The heavyweight division is poor as f**k right now, and has been for the last 5 odd years. If you, or anyone, think that fury beating wilder was a good heavyweight fight, and yep, fury did win, then I don't know what heavyweight fights you've seen. Fury, after all his mental issues, down to drugs and booze etc, beat a guy that only has a big punch, essentially, poor poor poor
  18. shaaark
    Best post on this thread so far ?
  19. shaaark
    Sounds good fella. Good to hear someone having the sense to know when enough is enough, without pushing a young dog too far. Top man ?
  20. shaaark
    And they weren't greyhounds, they were whippets ?
  21. shaaark
    Can't stand either of them, but as soon as I hear that silly f***ing 'BOOOOMB SQUAAAAAD', kin el, I hope fury punishes him for a few rounds before stopping him
  22. shaaark
    Agreeing with you here, 3 stone advantage is quite franky, RIDICULOUS! And only happens with heavyweights. The heavyweight division is quite frankly, a joke. If you're over 200lb you can fight someone that's 220, 230, 240 or more, f***ing ridiculous!
  23. shaaark
    Sort of agree with that too. Had a lurcher bitch, quite a few years ago now, that was showing good signs as a working dog, up until she got to about 2 1/2 years old. But she didn't level out weightwise, and was very powerfully built, 29" tts 80lbs, and never learnt to use her speed and weight to her advantage. Caught a few things, but on rabbits she wasn't even fairly useful
  24. shaaark
    Yeah, had a few over the years, and the smaller lighter ones were generally less prone to injuries. But like you say, same with most dogs, bringing them up in the environment/conditions you intend to work them in is key
  25. shaaark
    Too big and bulky, can't handle their speed and size as well as smaller greyhounds
×
×
  • Create New...