Blackbriar 8,568 Posted September 8, 2017 Report Share Posted September 8, 2017 I bet they're feeling awfully silly now sat in a jail cell with terrorism charges and a 10 year sentence hanging over them all for a bit of banter. And how ironic that some of the people screaming about what a nonsense it is will be the very same people that put them in jail And how ironic that those making a fuss about such men will happily run for cover behind them ! 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,385 Posted September 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2017 (edited) Why would anyone run for cover behind a terrorist? Sounds like a bad idea to me. Edited September 8, 2017 by BGD Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 44,322 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 I bet they're feeling awfully silly now sat in a jail cell with terrorism charges and a 10 year sentence hanging over them all for a bit of banter. And how ironic that some of the people screaming about what a nonsense it is will be the very same people that put them in jail And how ironic that those making a fuss about such men will happily run for cover behind them ! Also true mate, what a perverse world it is 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 44,322 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 Why would anyone run for cover behind a terrorist? Sounds like a bad idea to me. Dont you vote for labour ? ANYONE who voted for Labour or Conservative is complicit in locking these lads behind bars.......Blair started the trend when cosying up to the IRA and the Cinservatives carried on the policy unabated in their attempt to be more New Labour than New Labour. If you DIDNT vote Tory or Labour then your conscience is clear. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 I have to confess that I'd never heard of National Action, before they were banned, but I think a surefire way to make an organisation more popular, and more dangerous, is to ban it. Here we are, discussing a tiny group that, only a short time ago, no-one knew existed, who havent actually claimed responsibility for harming anyone, or even had a viable plot disrupted.........You can't ban ideas ! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 Why would anyone run for cover behind a terrorist? Sounds like a bad idea to me. Most of us here support the sentiment that if you're not prepared to stand behind our troops, you should feel free to stand in front of them ! 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel cain 42,889 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 Well said mate. Atb dc Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 44,322 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 I have to confess that I'd never heard of National Action, before they were banned, but I think a surefire way to make an organisation more popular, and more dangerous, is to ban it. Here we are, discussing a tiny group that, only a short time ago, no-one knew existed, who havent actually claimed responsibility for harming anyone, or even had a viable plot disrupted.........You can't ban ideas ! I totally agree mate. Personally I think the banning of ideas is exactly what some politicians want to do and I see western governments heading in that very direction. It's like all this hyperbole about the Brexit negotiations, they ain't trying to "get the best deal for Britain" imho......what they are doing is trying to work out how it can all carry on as before while just giving people the illusion of being an independent country. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 I have to confess that I'd never heard of National Action, before they were banned, but I think a surefire way to make an organisation more popular, and more dangerous, is to ban it. Here we are, discussing a tiny group that, only a short time ago, no-one knew existed, who havent actually claimed responsibility for harming anyone, or even had a viable plot disrupted.........You can't ban ideas ! I totally agree mate. Personally I think the banning of ideas is exactly what some politicians want to do and I see western governments heading in that very direction. It's like all this hyperbole about the Brexit negotiations, they ain't trying to "get the best deal for Britain" imho......what they are doing is trying to work out how it can all carry on as before while just giving people the illusion of being an independent country. 'Praps successive governments should have proscribed themselves, as they pose the most serious threat to our freedom and liberty ! 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,385 Posted September 9, 2017 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 Why would anyone run for cover behind a terrorist? Sounds like a bad idea to me.Most of us here support the sentiment that if you're not prepared to stand behind our troops, you should feel free to stand in front of them ! So all "troops" should be immune from criticism? What a ridiculous idea! I've got nothing against decent, law abiding soldiers. Criminals who join banned terror organisations are a different matter. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stumfelter 3,032 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 Why would anyone run for cover behind a terrorist? Sounds like a bad idea to me. Dont you vote for labour ? ANYONE who voted for Labour or Conservative is complicit in locking these lads behind bars.......Blair started the trend when cosying up to the IRA and the Cinservatives carried on the policy unabated in their attempt to be more New Labour than New Labour. If you DIDNT vote Tory or Labour then your conscience is clear. That's me in the clear then as I voted for the green party. I particularly liked their anti field sports stance, ffs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 Its a shame the left aren't so passionate about genuine terrorists that actually kill people... Maybe lives could have been saved Its silence or excuse after excuse..... They must sit praying the right wing do something so they can jump on it 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blackmaggie 3,375 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 (edited) Bgd you chat some shite your just a troll but wasn't it your hero corbyn and his side kick Abbott amongst others who refused to ban or see groups such as all.Qaeda hamas Hezbollah etc as terrorists even calling Hama's friends theses are real terrorist who have killed thousands yet your hear banging on about a group that's never hurt anyone corbyn even sits with the IRA the traitorous cnut Edited September 9, 2017 by blackmaggie 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 Why would anyone run for cover behind a terrorist? Sounds like a bad idea to me.Most of us here support the sentiment that if you're not prepared to stand behind our troops, you should feel free to stand in front of them ! So all "troops" should be immune from criticism? What a ridiculous idea! I've got nothing against decent, law abiding soldiers. Criminals who join banned terror organisations are a different matter. Criminal ? No-one has been found guilty of anything, as far as I'm aware..... 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted September 9, 2017 Report Share Posted September 9, 2017 BGD you really are some Cnut ........ 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.