Jump to content

What Next!!!!!!!


Recommended Posts

Here's the point

It's when you have an option and you don't take

It

When I used to do it it was because I had no other option

But to stress an animal out for hours and then not stun it when i could have is barbaric

It's the fact that you could stun but don't

That's not hypocrisy

I never had that option when l was legally running deer with dogs

If I did I would have taken it

But I didn't

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Dont see an issue with it Maybe the cctvs could pick up how barbaric halal slaughter really is

It's not only halal needs watching .There are some right unstable c**ts working in slaughterhouses .

Completely different. I've been a slaughter man and knacker man so I'm no soft arse....but them fckers are evil cnuts....seen it with my own eyes.   ... anyway that's off topic in a way   ....I do

Here's the point

It's when you have an option and you don't take

It

When I used to do it it was because I had no other option

But to stress an animal out for hours and then not stun it when i could have is barbaric

It's the fact that you could stun but don't

That's not hypocrisy

I never had that option when l was legally running deer with dogs

If I did I would have taken it

But I didn't

Did you have the option not to hunt?

 

I hope I'm not trolling you & I'm not defending halal, because I really couldn't give a shit either way, but you call ginger a moron, but then put up a flimsy argument at best...haha. Surely you had the option not to run deer with dogs?

A better argument, if you wanted deer meat, would be the 'option' of using a firearm, rather than course a deer across two fields with a lurcher, then dispatch it by cutting it throat. I'd prefer the latter, but then I'm not the one shouting about 'options' ;-)

Edited by Accip74
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Here's the point

It's when you have an option and you don't take

It

When I used to do it it was because I had no other option

But to stress an animal out for hours and then not stun it when i could have is barbaric

It's the fact that you could stun but don't

That's not hypocrisy

I never had that option when l was legally running deer with dogs

If I did I would have taken it

But I didn't

Did you have the option not to hunt?

 

I hope I'm not trolling you & I'm not defending halal, because I really couldn't give a shit either way, but you call ginger a moron, but then put up a flimsy argument at best...haha. Surely you had the option not to run deer with dogs?

A better argument, if you wanted deer meat, would be the 'option' of using a firearm, rather than course a deer across two fields with a lurcher, then dispatch it by cutting it throat. I'd prefer the latter, but then I'm not the one shouting about 'options' ;-)

I'm also not shouting

I was also not breaking any laws

And tbh I'm not overly interested in debating this

Imagine we change that to road traffic accident

I would and have dispatched deer that people have hit and not bothered to stop and see if it's dead

No option of stunning

But I'm not barbaric for putting it out of its misery

Watch a few halal slaughter videos

See if you'd rather have the chance of running away from a dog back on the day

Or the way it's done on massive scale for absolutely no reason

Halal isn't compulsory to Islam/muslims

They can eat meat slaughtered our way and say a prayer to cleanse it

But we've bent over backwards to allow this on a massive scale

We imported 5000 Pakistani butchers to keep up with the demands argument is remotely flimsy

I'm saying if you have a choice of stunning in an abbatoir you'd be a sick person not to use it

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

No more or no less unstable than people who work in tesco or the post office.

That's probaly the stupidest thing i have read! And you who claim to be pretty smart and well educated.

 

I think a few in here just like to argue for arguments sake. They could @least have the odd day off!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

95% of the THL experts have not go a clue about Halal and Kosher what is permitted and what is not or how to despatch any live stock other than eating Mac D,s or KFC.

Then why don't you take this opportunity to enlighten us ?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe a daft question and of topic but has anyone petitioned for cctv in old folks homes.

WHO decides what is cruel and what's not .When working on the f&m outbreak half way thru we where instructed to stop the lads from tail twisting the beasts when trying to get them into the crush but the use of a stick was ok and we also had vets on site. We kill animals to eat could this be the real issue driven by vegans and the public who have no idea of how the meat gets to the table..

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Here's the point

It's when you have an option and you don't take

It

When I used to do it it was because I had no other option

But to stress an animal out for hours and then not stun it when i could have is barbaric

It's the fact that you could stun but don't

That's not hypocrisy

I never had that option when l was legally running deer with dogs

If I did I would have taken it

But I didn't

Did you have the option not to hunt?

I hope I'm not trolling you & I'm not defending halal, because I really couldn't give a shit either way, but you call ginger a moron, but then put up a flimsy argument at best...haha. Surely you had the option not to run deer with dogs?

A better argument, if you wanted deer meat, would be the 'option' of using a firearm, rather than course a deer across two fields with a lurcher, then dispatch it by cutting it throat. I'd prefer the latter, but then I'm not the one shouting about 'options' ;-)

I'm also not shouting

I was also not breaking any laws

And tbh I'm not overly interested in debating this

Imagine we change that to road traffic accident

I would and have dispatched deer that people have hit and not bothered to stop and see if it's dead

No option of stunning

But I'm not barbaric for putting it out of its misery

Watch a few halal slaughter videos

See if you'd rather have the chance of running away from a dog back on the day

Or the way it's done on massive scale for absolutely no reason

Halal isn't compulsory to Islam/muslims

They can eat meat slaughtered our way and say a prayer to cleanse it

But we've bent over backwards to allow this on a massive scale

We imported 5000 Pakistani butchers to keep up with the demands argument is remotely flimsy

I'm saying if you have a choice of stunning in an abbatoir you'd be a sick person not to use it

I'm not arsed to debate it either mate, just pointing out we have options as well. Nobody makes us hunt for enjoyment, which is my only reason really & many think I'm sick for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a period I would argue I wasn't hunting for enjoyment

But to keep food on the table

Those days are gone for now

Well I'm not going dispute that, me personally? the occasional meal is just a by-product of my enjoyment........but that's another debate I suppose ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...