WILF 49,521 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I may be wrong but I think Mackems wording was "there is a video circulating".......to me that don't imply that he watched it. Whatever, personally I could not and would not seek out a video like that let alone watch the f***ing thing and whichever news channel is broadcasting it should be shut down. I fully get BGDs point and I agree with it but that don't make Mackem guilty of watching it IMHO Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,907 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 (edited) BGD just take a step back and reassess what you are saying. You have made some pretty damning statements based on some poor assumptions. You've assumed that because mackem can describe the events of this video that he must have watched it, without any consideration for a legitimate alternate explanation. Like perhaps he read a news article about it? I've read no less descriptive reports in mainstream media. From there you have accused him of having pedophile 'mates', assuming that if he did indeed not watch it himself then he must have a nonce mate that told him all about it. Just steady on with this attack on mackem. Popular opinion seems to be that it's totally unjustified and you're doing yourself a disservice. In this case I'm inclined to agree with popular opinion without substantial evidence to the contrary.... Edited February 25, 2016 by Born Hunter 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,907 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 (edited) I also don't think that we should ban the media reporting on such things. So long as it is done in a manor that does not actively support the distribution of such footage. There's nothing in what mackem has written that suggests either he or anyone he knows watched it, or for that matter that where he read about this in any way supports it's distribution. Completely censoring discussion and reporting of these things does nothing for a free society or for that matter the safety of a society. Edited February 25, 2016 by Born Hunter 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 He never said he watched it But that's one of the problems in this country when it comes to Muslims / immigrants or just those that are not British Try say anything negative about them and some will divert away from the main problem Twisting what is said until all attention is focussed somewhere else 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shepp 2,285 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 (edited) BGD why not have a look on here, apparently they go for people like you. https://rotherham-jobsonline.co.uk Edited February 25, 2016 by shepp Quote Link to post Share on other sites
twobob 1,499 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm bang out of order for thinking it's wrong to watch a video of a little boy being brutally sodomised by a group of grown men? Give your heads a shake for feck sake Youve twisted it from a "lad" which could be any age (im 33 and have been described as a lad to child and now its a little boy, whether its something he should or shouldnt watch (I wouldnt personally, see what you have done now I feel like I need to defend myself!) Its obvious he hasnt downloaded child porn which is what your insinuating. Your a scumbag. He said a "boy" which folk generally use to refer to children, not "lad" like you said. Who's twisting things? If thinking you have to be sick in the head to watch a video of a boy being brutally raped by a group of men makes you a scumbag then I guess youre right, I am a scumbag. can you see owt up your own arse??????? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rake aboot 4,936 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm bang out of order for thinking it's wrong to watch a video of a little boy being brutally sodomised by a group of grown men? Give your heads a shake for feck sake Youve twisted it from a "lad" which could be any age (im 33 and have been described as a lad to child and now its a little boy, whether its something he should or shouldnt watch (I wouldnt personally, see what you have done now I feel like I need to defend myself!) Its obvious he hasnt downloaded child porn which is what your insinuating. Your a scumbag.He said a "boy" which folk generally use to refer to children, not "lad" like you said. Who's twisting things? If thinking you have to be sick in the head to watch a video of a boy being brutally raped by a group of men makes you a scumbag then I guess youre right, I am a scumbag. He also mentioned that it happened in public with people walking by doing nothing yet you don't mention anything about that. I find your manipulative ways absolutely pathetic. Anyone that stands by while a child is abused wants stringing up, any right minded person would agree, I'd extended that to anyone that seeks out and watches videos of the same abuse. Would you? ANYONE who seeks out and watches? Well you'd have to be pretty sick to actively seek out videos of a child being raped, don't you agree? Honestly am shocked at the amount of folk on here that think it's fine and normal to sit back with a cup of tea and watch a video of a boy being gang raped. What good reason is there to seek out and watch a video like that? I'm not saying anyone that watches a video like that is a paedophile doing it for sexual gratification but they're not right in the head whatever they watch it for. You`re a clown, and you`re making an idiot of yourself by trying to make someone out as a sicko, for whatever reason I can`t see. Somehow I doubt you would make the same accusations to the mans face. He stated there was a video doing the rounds, that was it, I know there are videos doing the rounds of people getting their heads cut off, and I know what happens in them, but I`ve never seen them. Use your head and stop making an arse of yourself. You`ve marked yourself out as a fool after this thread bud,. 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Silversnake 1,099 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm bang out of order for thinking it's wrong to watch a video of a little boy being brutally sodomised by a group of grown men? Give your heads a shake for feck sake Youve twisted it from a "lad" which could be any age (im 33 and have been described as a lad to child and now its a little boy, whether its something he should or shouldnt watch (I wouldnt personally, see what you have done now I feel like I need to defend myself!) Its obvious he hasnt downloaded child porn which is what your insinuating. Your a scumbag.He said a "boy" which folk generally use to refer to children, not "lad" like you said. Who's twisting things? If thinking you have to be sick in the head to watch a video of a boy being brutally raped by a group of men makes you a scumbag then I guess youre right, I am a scumbag. He also mentioned that it happened in public with people walking by doing nothing yet you don't mention anything about that. I find your manipulative ways absolutely pathetic. Anyone that stands by while a child is abused wants stringing up, any right minded person would agree, I'd extended that to anyone that seeks out and watches videos of the same abuse. Would you? ANYONE who seeks out and watches? Well you'd have to be pretty sick to actively seek out videos of a child being raped, don't you agree? Honestly am shocked at the amount of folk on here that think it's fine and normal to sit back with a cup of tea and watch a video of a boy being gang raped. What good reason is there to seek out and watch a video like that? I'm not saying anyone that watches a video like that is a paedophile doing it for sexual gratification but they're not right in the head whatever they watch it for. You`re a clown, and you`re making an idiot of yourself by trying to make someone out as a sicko, for whatever reason I can`t see. Somehow I doubt you would make the same accusations to the mans face. He stated there was a video doing the rounds, that was it, I know there are videos doing the rounds of people getting their heads cut off, and I know what happens in them, but I`ve never seen them. Use your head and stop making an arse of yourself. You`ve marked yourself out as a fool after this thread bud,. I don't mean to pick on bgd but he always twists things to suit what i assume is a deranged politically correct agenda. This is a classic example a guy describes a disturbing and sickening event that happened in PUBLIC and bgd interprets that as an opportunity to attack the person describing the event! Why??? You obviously are not seeking any truth or fairness you are using the age old media TRICK of discredit by sensationalism. I know a certain religious group who uses these same tricks to great success. Which religious group do you belong to bgd? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nitestalker 28 209 Posted February 26, 2016 Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 They all need shooting not just the "foreign scumbags" also the Teacher who was kiddy fiddling a 14 year old girl which appears in the same newspaper and the Sunderland footballer strange no mention still suppose they are not foreigners and home grown.Diversity I suppose it should be one law for all with a maximum penalty death by hanging. and the dirty twat wanking himself off in his car outside the mosque when kids were about to come out of school and when approached by women and called dirty just carried on and that appeared in the same newspaper.more diversity,strange you did not mention that article db I didnt see it so you point scoring ? I would gladly make a noose out of cheese wire to hang any of the c**ts , peados rapists groomers all desrve the death penalty. not depending on race religion or colour. 100% agree if guilty death end of save time and money and send a message to other scum alike? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,437 Posted February 26, 2016 Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 Let's step back and take a moment to remember what we're talking about, a video of a boy being raped on the side of the road by a group of men. A video that would be illegal to download, view or possess in the UK.I honestly can't believe it's so controversial to say only a wrongun would watch a video like that. What sort of mindset does it take to sit through that? Watching and listening to a child being brutalised in the worst possible way. Would could you possibly gain from it?The fact so many of you seem to think it's perfectly acceptable is frankly shameful and shows just how warped you've become.Think I'll leave it there, this whole discussion has left a bad taste in my mouth.Fair play to WILF and others that actually have a functioning moral compass Quote Link to post Share on other sites
delboy_187 904 Posted February 26, 2016 Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 Scum hope they get caught . Dirty jockeys should be passed from cell to cell and rode with a deck brushes Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted February 26, 2016 Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 Let's step back and take a moment to remember what we're talking about, a video of a boy being raped on the side of the road by a group of men. A video that would be illegal to download, view or possess in the UK. I honestly can't believe it's so controversial to say only a wrongun would watch a video like that. What sort of mindset does it take to sit through that? Watching and listening to a child being brutalised in the worst possible way. Would could you possibly gain from it? The fact so many of you seem to think it's perfectly acceptable is frankly shameful and shows just how warped you've become. Think I'll leave it there, this whole discussion has left a bad taste in my mouth. Fair play to WILF and others that actually have a functioning moral compass Bgd your still trying to twist it, we all know how disturbing the video must be, no ones arguing that, mackem didnt watch it, you assumed he did, no ones arguing the fact the vid is horrible, but again, mackem just pointed out it was there, an you jump on him, trying to say he watched it, an bring him down, shoot the messanger as someone said. Your trying to cover for the muslim actions again, by kicking up a fuss, cause mackem pointed out these disturbing acts. Deal with it, its true, there dirtbags, that need shot. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shepp 2,285 Posted February 26, 2016 Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 BGD, I know this twisting of words and attempting to shame somebody, is a tool used by the left all the time. No doubt the people reporting crimes by the paki grooming gangs received the same treatment by the left wing local authority. On this forum we are a bit more straitforward than that and don't take kindly to these weasel ways of yours. Even your last post is trying to twist things in a way that makes us look like perverts and just WILF 'and others' have a correct moral compass. The only person with a f****d up moral compass is you and your twisted loyalty to a bunch of people who would gived a chance wipe their arse on you. 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
twobob 1,499 Posted February 26, 2016 Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 BGD, I know this twisting of words and attempting to shame somebody, is a tool used by the left all the time. No doubt the people reporting crimes by the paki grooming gangs received the same treatment by the left wing local authority. On this forum we are a bit more straitforward than that and don't take kindly to these weasel ways of yours. Even your last post is trying to twist things in a way that makes us look like perverts and just WILF 'and others' have a correct moral compass. The only person with a f****d up moral compass is you and your twisted loyalty to a bunch of people who would gived a chance wipe their arse on you. backfired a bit on him a bit hasnt it 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.