Ice shooting

[Dazmac 54]

20 minutes ago, TOMO said:

Goes back to what I said above....she shouldn't have been there...

I agree with you,I was just pointing out that maybe she didn't have to die but she chose to be there so at the end of the day its all on her. There's another video out showing her blocking the street and honking her horn and if you watch the silver car passing her you see her drive at that,she far from an innocent victim.

The latest info coming out is showing she wasn't the innocent mum of 3 she's being portrayed as,apparently the 2 older kids were removed because her Wife liked to beat them and stub cigarettes out on them. There's a picture of her police records apparently showing charges for child abuse and charges for hitting Police officers.

[jukel123 10,055]

12 minutes ago, Dazmac said:

I agree with you,I was just pointing out that maybe she didn't have to die but she chose to be there so at the end of the day its all on her. There's another video out showing her blocking the street and honking her horn and if you watch the silver car passing her you see her drive at that,she far from an innocent victim.

The latest info coming out is showing she wasn't the innocent mum of 3 she's being portrayed as,apparently the 2 older kids were removed because her Wife liked to beat them and stub cigarettes out on them. There's a picture of her police records apparently showing charges for child abuse and charges for hitting Police officers.

Fact checkers have researched that allegation. There are no substantiated court records or press reports which contain that story. It was traced back to a viral story on X.

( I wonder if Gofundme has a refund facility lol?)

There's a counter allegation against the cop. Namely that he has a 2022 conviction for sexually assaulting his Filipino step daughter. This was published in The Guardian. Foul! I hear you cry, The Guardian supports the soft left.( The Liberal Party actually) So what I say?  It's more reliable than X. And it's  at least as reliable as most newspapers and news agencies which overwhelmingly support the right. And which are owned by the super rich determined to imprint their world view upon its readers and viewers.

The Guardian had better be able to substantiate that allegation , or else they are in for a big libel case

Tbh, I think neither bits of gossip are relevant. It's all medieval bollox...burn the witch stuff.

Going back to points raised. I don't agree she drove at him. She drove off in a split second with her partner screaming "drive baby drive." Her wheels were pointing away from the cop. Not toward him.

Yes she was obstructing police and being a childish irritant. She should have been charged with  police obstruction and maybe dangerous/ reckless or careless driving. But the cop had no authority to shoot her. Not all cops are b*****ds. But, imo, this one was.

Afterthought. What with Venezuela, Greenland and now this story. The media are saying nothing about only 1% of the Epstein files being published. Despite the government being legally required to do so. Hmn, classic distractions?

[WILF 51,944]

14 hours ago, jukel123 said:

I see it differently.

1) Her wheels were pointing to the right. If she had wanted to nail him they would have been pointing left towards him. She had just said to his colleague , smilingly , ' I don't hate you'.

2) The car brushed him. He was reaching for his gun as soon as the vehicle moved off.

3) To me the shooting was REVENGE  for failing to stop. "f***ing bitch" were his words after he killed her. His life was never in danger ffs.

4) What the f**k is he doing shooting at American citizens?  His job is to locate and arrest suspected illegal immigrants. Yes she was being an irritating  SJW. The two women were behaving like arsehole teenagers. That doesn't mean they can be shot at. Anybody who deals with the public, be it a shop,assistant, barman, parking attendant or whatever will get shit from people at some point in their week. Its part of the job.

5) Why are these ICE officers masked and wearing no Identification number? You let people be anonymous and some will think it's Xmas and start thinking they are vengeful gods whose word is law. Remember the cops who attacked the  miners? They took off their ID  and behaved like animals too.

6) ICE cops are told NOT to shoot at vehicles even if they contain suspected illegal immigrants. Despite this directive, there have been six fatalities involving ICE cops shooting at vehicles.

7) The only crime she committed in my opinion is at most reckless or dangerous driving. Her private life seems to offend the moral majority. It has nothing to do with the facts of this case.

He will probably not even face trial. And  if he did the  full weight of the establishment will be behind him. He will be portrayed as a cop protecting US citizens.

In my opinion he's doing the opposite. I think he shot at her in white-hot anger. And if I was on a jury, on the evidence I've seen in the videos, I would find find him guilty of murder.

Even in the  culture of America, where gun crime and trigger happy cops are the norm, tens of thousands of people have turned out across America to protest at what they  see as a callous assassination by a  cop far exceeding his authority. 

Excellent, well thought out post mate.

You are spot on with almost every point.

Points 4 & 7 are absolute nail on the head.

However, I think as I said it’s a case of play silly games etc…..the truth of it is probably the woman and the officer both got it wrong in this particular scenario and if that’s the case, you have to back the people you put in harms way to protect you…..otherwise you end up like us wankers prosecuting old soldiers for perceived wrongs to people who were intent on causing aggro.

You have to choose a a side, but you have to make sure the professionals know this don’t give them carte blanche to make such rash decisions again 

 

[greg64 3,103]

i wonder if her partners words of drive baby drive will haunt her for the rest of her life

[Daniel cain 50,340]

There's some right f***ing idiots on this planet...and this clown is right up there

[mackem 31,121]

[Halfhound 728]

Tensions spilling over and people being shot in questionable circumstances at anti government marches or protests? Hardly a new thing is it. If she had of drove over the cop and killed him the looneys would say it was his fault it went the other way and she ended up shot and the right are saying it’s her fault. It’s a tragedy for everyone involved and probably shouldn’t of happened but if you want to go out and stand up against people you disagree with who are armed you sure as hell better be able to get the first smack in or this is what happens. These looneys are out playing games and entertaining themselves at the weekends with this nonsense. I reckon a lot of the part timers will stay home next weekend. 

[Demirel 1]

42 minutes ago, WILF said:

Excellent, well thought out post mate.

You are spot on with almost every point.

Points 4 & 7 are absolute nail on the head.

However, I think as I said it’s a case of play silly games etc…..the truth of it is probably the woman and the officer both got it wrong in this particular scenario and if that’s the case, you have to back the people you put in harms way to protect you…..otherwise you end up like us wankers prosecuting old soldiers for perceived wrongs to people who were intent on causing aggro.

You have to choose a a side, but you have to make sure the professionals know this don’t give them carte blanche to make such rash decisions again    

eCricket on BetBazar is a virtual cyber cricket betting platform offering fast-paced and dynamic match scenarios regardless of the actual season. 

Fair take. I agree it’s rarely black and white — most situations like this are a mix of poor decisions on both sides.

[Bendigo 1,664]

I don't understand why armed cops don't shoot the guns out of criminals hands. I once saw it happen on a documentary/ action movie....so it's definitely possible.

[iworkwhippets 13,248]

10 minutes ago, Bendigo said:

I don't understand why armed cops don't shoot the guns out of criminals hands. I once saw it happen on a documentary/ action movie....so it's definitely possible.

Eh, so an armed gunman mows down several people , and you expect the copper aims for the gunman's gun, fek that off, I've read some silly topics and replies on this forum, but that's a cracker, Right that's my reply, I'm just in the throws of ordering better boxes, ta ta fer now 

[jukel123 10,055]

1 hour ago, WILF said:

Excellent, well thought out post mate.

You are spot on with almost every point.

Points 4 & 7 are absolute nail on the head.

However, I think as I said it’s a case of play silly games etc…..the truth of it is probably the woman and the officer both got it wrong in this particular scenario and if that’s the case, you have to back the people you put in harms way to protect you…..otherwise you end up like us wankers prosecuting old soldiers for perceived wrongs to people who were intent on causing aggro.

You have to choose a a side, but you have to make sure the professionals know this don’t give them carte blanche to make such rash decisions again 

 

 Yup , " the woman and the officer got it wrong". Agree with that.

[Greyman 33,125]

Split second decisions affect all our lives juke, if you turned left instead of right it could cost you your life she could have had a lay in or an extra coffee or a flat tyre and still been alive it’s sad for some but it’s the lottery we all play everyday of our life mate 

[mackem 31,121]

A new term has entered the English lexicon.

 

[mackem 31,121]

[green lurchers 17,652]

4 hours ago, jukel123 said:

Fact checkers have researched that allegation. There are no substantiated court records or press reports which contain that story. It was traced back to a viral story on X.

( I wonder if Gofundme has a refund facility lol?)

There's a counter allegation against the cop. Namely that he has a 2022 conviction for sexually assaulting his Filipino step daughter. This was published in The Guardian. Foul! I hear you cry, The Guardian supports the soft left.( The Liberal Party actually) So what I say?  It's more reliable than X. And it's  at least as reliable as most newspapers and news agencies which overwhelmingly support the right. And which are owned by the super rich determined to imprint their world view upon its readers and viewers.

The Guardian had better be able to substantiate that allegation , or else they are in for a big libel case

Tbh, I think neither bits of gossip are relevant. It's all medieval bollox...burn the witch stuff.

Going back to points raised. I don't agree she drove at him. She drove off in a split second with her partner screaming "drive baby drive." Her wheels were pointing away from the cop. Not toward him.

Yes she was obstructing police and being a childish irritant. She should have been charged with  police obstruction and maybe dangerous/ reckless or careless driving. But the cop had no authority to shoot her. Not all cops are b*****ds. But, imo, this one was.

Afterthought. What with Venezuela, Greenland and now this story. The media are saying nothing about only 1% of the Epstein files being published. Despite the government being legally required to do so. Hmn, classic distractions?

Classic distraction is that state stealing billions in the daycare scams  and other means , which is the reason the feds are present !!! along with illegals they rounding up some of which ain’t nice folk . So my point is if Thers a protest near me like just stop oil  if I had the time I coukd think ya know wat il go and tell em to fk off and stop blocking roads you cost me money  getting a work , bare in mind I know nothing gonna happen  to me ther be no danger to my life no guns will be there I coukd heckle or even drag a couple out the road  so we can work to look after kids grandkids  yep that’s a logical thought process . If they holding guns the feds and the odd activist  and arrest is possible if I break the law and stand in the way of law enforcement  which is the law  logical thought would say stay at home  she got her reward for her lack of thought and care for her family basically not right in the mind bit like folk who inhale the left wing media bullshit  and believe the fairy story   

All boils down to truth facts logic 

Edited 11 hours ago by green lurchers