Silversnake 1,099 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 Unbelievable, having a minutes silence for a terror attack How dare they Saudi Arabia played Australia in a soccer world cup qualifier here in Adelaide a few days after the islamic terror attack in Manchester which included two Australians killed and the Saudi team refused to acknowledge the minute silence! The reason given, because it was against their 'culture' you couldn't make this $hit up. Reports from people in the crowd said the Saudi section also refused to pay their respects! At least we beat the low, stinking terrorist supporting scum... But guess what it was hardly reported by the msm, WTF!!!That really is shameful I'm not sure about it not being reported in the "msm" though, I just had a quick Google and it seems it was reported in loads of UK and Australian papers and news sites including the "mainstream" ones? I said hardly reported, I didn't hear about it and many people I talked to didn't either but when I searched I found it was reported. People who don't search for things like this don't hear about it and those who do search are labelled racist or paranoid or looking for negatives etc. Anyway these are the times we live in. Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,401 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 Looks like it was quite widely reported to me, maybe you just weren't paying attention? Out of interest what level of coverage would you consider acceptable? Frontpage of every newspaper? Link to post Share on other sites
tilimangro 1,013 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 Looks like it was quite widely reported to me, maybe you just weren't paying attention? Out of interest what level of coverage would you consider acceptable? Frontpage of every newspaper? I've avoided commenting up till nowYou're a plank bgd You're trolling and just trying to get a rise It wasn't "widely reported" I hadnt heard that and a lot of others hadn't If you wish to debate or discuss awesome crack on But what you're doing right now is trolling and being a first class c**t Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,401 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 Looks like it was quite widely reported to me, maybe you just weren't paying attention? Out of interest what level of coverage would you consider acceptable? Frontpage of every newspaper? I've avoided commenting up till nowYou're a plank bgd You're trolling and just trying to get a rise It wasn't "widely reported" I hadnt heard that and a lot of others hadn't If you wish to debate or discuss awesome crack on But what you're doing right now is trolling and being a first class c**t https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/jun/08/saudi-arabia-footballers-ignore-minutes-silence-for-london-attack-victims http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/saudi-arabia-football-team-refuse-to-observe-minutes-silence-for-victims-of-london-terror-attack_uk_593a53c1e4b0b13f2c69206f http://metro.co.uk/2017/06/08/saudi-arabia-national-team-fails-to-honour-minutes-silence-for-london-terror-victims-6694996/ http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/814647/London-Bridge-Terror-Attack-Saudi-Arabia-Australia http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/06/08/saudi-arabia-football-team-fail-line-minutes-silence-honour/ http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/saudi-arabia-players-fail-line-10584951 http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/london-bridge-terror-attack-saudi-arabia-football-team-criticism-minutes-silence-a7778976.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4584294/Saudi-soccer-team-refuse-stand-London-victims.html Seems quite widely reported to me? And that's just the UK papers... There was even a thread on the subject on THL! http://www.thehuntinglife.com/forums/topic/370045-saudi-football-team/ Link to post Share on other sites
tilimangro 1,013 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 Was it prominent No The sheer fact you're arguing over minutiae demonstrates what a cuck you are Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,401 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 Was it prominent No The sheer fact you're arguing over minutiae demonstrates what a cuck you are So you now admit it WAS widely reported but you're unhappy with the prominence given to the story? Well that goes back to my earlier question to Silversnake, what level of coverage would have satisfied you? Link to post Share on other sites
tilimangro 1,013 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 You're demonstrating my point You're arguing over tiny details because you have no arguement A lot of us didn't see it it wasn't on the news It wasn't widely reported Do you agree with them for what they did Do you feel they were just in ignoring the one minutes silence Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,401 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 (edited) You're demonstrating my point You're arguing over tiny details because you have no arguement A lot of us didn't see it it wasn't on the news It wasn't widely reported Do you agree with them for what they did Do you feel they were just in ignoring the one minutes silence It was in every major UK paper and on Sky and BBC news, in what world is that not widely reported? How could it have been more widely reported? National billboard campaign? Read my first post in reply to Silversnake you clown, I said it was shameful behaviour. Edited June 30, 2017 by BGD Link to post Share on other sites
tilimangro 1,013 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 Some of us didn't see or read it It wasn't widely reported Clown? Pots and kettles my little troll X Any other intelligent debate No I thought not just more trolling from an ineffectual emasculated halfwit Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,362 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 Bgd are you ever wrong? Or can you not just be satisfied with your knowledge, instead of arguing condecendedley all the time? Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,362 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 You're demonstrating my point You're arguing over tiny details because you have no arguement A lot of us didn't see it it wasn't on the news It wasn't widely reported Do you agree with them for what they did Do you feel they were just in ignoring the one minutes silence It was in every major UK paper and on Sky and BBC news, in what world is that not widely reported? How could it have been more widely reported? National billboard campaign? Read my first post in reply to Silversnake you clown, I said it was shameful behaviour. Do you have a best mate ? Dianne maybe mate? Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 (edited) Some of us didn't see or read it It wasn't widely reported Clown? Pots and kettles my little troll X Any other intelligent debate No I thought not just more trolling from an ineffectual emasculated halfwit Not crying about trolling again are we? surely not from you mate, I thought you were too sharp for that? Surely bgb is just pointing out the story is there if you want to find it? Is it suppose to be 'breaking news' or in neon lights? I only heard about it here, but I don't read news papers or screen all the worlds news on a daily basis, much like others on here it seems...... I hope I'm not trolling? Just an observation..... Edited June 30, 2017 by Accip74 2 Link to post Share on other sites
dave88 1,565 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 It was in every british newspaper ffs...just because people didnt see it doesn't mean it wasn't there 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 It was in every british newspaper ffs...just because people didnt see it doesn't mean it wasn't there Fcuk off troll!!! 1 Link to post Share on other sites
tilimangro 1,013 Posted June 30, 2017 Report Share Posted June 30, 2017 Some of us didn't see or read it It wasn't widely reported Clown? Pots and kettles my little troll X Any other intelligent debate No I thought not just more trolling from an ineffectual emasculated halfwit Not crying about trolling again are we? surely not from you mate, I thought you were too sharp for that? Surely bgb is just pointing out the story is there if you want to find it? Is it suppose to be 'breaking news' or in neon lights? I only heard about it here, but I don't read news papers or screen all the worlds news on a daily basis, much like others on here it seems...... I hope I'm not trolling? Just an observation..... my point is debate the story not wether or not it was widely or not widely reported When it comes down to arguing about wether something was widely or not reported it's just a f***ing bun fight that no good will come from I don't read papers either I watch the news just before I go to work and listen to radio4 I'm bored of bgd s constant arguing over the minutiae You don't know me well if you think I'm sharp chap ?Lol Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts