peterhunter86 8,627 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 There was a shooting at a mosque in canada and the mayor has condemnd it as a terrible terrerist attak bet he wouldnt be saying that if it was the other way around.i dont agree with any terror attaks rip to the victims. Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 I do not support, encourage or condone violence....by anyone. Two people have been arrested and I hope they will be punished to the limit of the law. Link to post Share on other sites
AXUM 255 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 There was a shooting at a mosque in canada and the mayor has condemnd it as a terrible terrerist attak bet he wouldnt be saying that if it was the other way around.i dont agree with any terror attaks rip to the victims. He wouldnt be saying that if it was other way around ? They always say that when a muslim terrorist attacks , what planet you living on Link to post Share on other sites
Silversnake 1,099 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 I am never happy to hear innocent people murdered. Rip to the victims. 3 Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 There was a shooting at a mosque in canada and the mayor has condemnd it as a terrible terrerist attak bet he wouldnt be saying that if it was the other way around.i dont agree with any terror attaks rip to the victims. He wouldnt be saying that if it was other way around ? They always say that when a muslim terrorist attacks , what planet you living on I assume you mean RIP to the poor victims rather than more point scoring. RIP. Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Gain 1,759 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 It looks like one of the two suspects arrested for the Quebec mosque shooting is of Moroccan origin, so highly likely a muslim himself, and both were heard to be yelling allahu akbar, so there may be more to this incident. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
peterhunter86 8,627 Posted January 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 There was a shooting at a mosque in canada and the mayor has condemnd it as a terrible terrerist attak bet he wouldnt be saying that if it was the other way around.i dont agree with any terror attaks rip to the victims. He wouldnt be saying that if it was other way around ? They always say that when a muslim terrorist attacks , what planet you living on They wouldnt thier bollox say it till they done an investigation and try cover it up first. Link to post Share on other sites
desertbred 5,490 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 (edited) Shootings in Masjids is not as rare as some would think , and the usual culprits call themselves Muslims also, Any loss of innocent life no matter whose or how caused is a waste and source of suffering for those left to mourn May the Souls of the victims rest in eternal peace. Edited January 30, 2017 by desertbred 8 Link to post Share on other sites
AXUM 255 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 There was a shooting at a mosque in canada and the mayor has condemnd it as a terrible terrerist attak bet he wouldnt be saying that if it was the other way around.i dont agree with any terror attaks rip to the victims. He wouldnt be saying that if it was other way around ? They always say that when a muslim terrorist attacks , what planet you living on They wouldnt thier bollox say it till they done an investigation and try cover it up first. You made an interesting point my friend Link to post Share on other sites
AXUM 255 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 It looks like one of the two suspects arrested for the Quebec mosque shooting is of Moroccan origin, so highly likely a muslim himself, and both were heard to be yelling allahu akbar, so there may be more to this incident. Unless its secterian islamic issue, why would muslim yell allahuakbar and shoot muslims prayinh to Allah, doesnt make sense. Link to post Share on other sites
johonawhitness 110 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 Some of these "radicalised" Muslims do put the "average" Muslims in the same category as the non believers and Christians etc Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 What a shame 6 dead Link to post Share on other sites
AXUM 255 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 Some of these "radicalised" Muslims do put the "average" Muslims in the same category as the non believers and Christians etc I remember reading that in some muslim school of thought a muslim isnt allowed to live in a darrulharb or place of war meaning those muslim are fighting against . So maybe they consider those muslim to be unmuslim because they live amongst the enemy and seek their protection Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 44,637 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 Right, firmly putting in my tin foil hat, I said to my wife this morning I bet that's Muslims doing that......it's just the timing of it. Trump makes an order that fucks a load of them up......so they go and slaughter a few and let the media do the rest ? Link to post Share on other sites
AXUM 255 Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 security (Aman) has to be with the security of Islam, i.e. the authority of Muslims. The evidence for this comes from the saying of Allah (swt), “Allah will not allow the disbelievers to have an authority over the believers.” [TMQ An- Nisa: 141] i.e. it is not allowed for the disbelievers to have authority (Sultan) over the believers, because giving them authority means that the security of Muslims is in the hands of Kufr and not in the hands of Islam. Furthermore, the Prophet (saw) used to order the invasion of every land which did not submit to the Sultan of Muslims, and he used to engage in war against them whether the inhabitants were Muslim or non-Muslim. Anas narrated that: “Wherever the Prophet (saw) raided some people he would not raid except in the morning. If he heard the Adhan he would refrain, and if he did not he would invade after dawn”. And it was narrated by Essam Almusny, who said: “The Prophet (saw) used to tell to the expeditions that he sent: ‘If you` have seen a mosque or heard a call for prayer, then do not kill anybody.’” The Adhan and the mosque are considered symbols of Islam, a matter which indicates that if the land is inhabited by Muslims this does not prevent it from being invaded and fought against as an act of war, but the important factor is that its people will not be killed, yet it will be invaded. This means that it is considered Dar al-Harb or Dar al-Kufr because, though the symbols or rituals of Islam are present, it is not protected by the authority of the Prophet (saw), i.e. the authority and security of Islam. So it would be considered Dar al-Harb (land of war), and like any land defined as Dar al-Harb it would be invaded. It should be clear that whether the population of the land is majority Muslim or not irrelevant in terms of considering it Dar al-Islam as long as the authority lies with the Muslims. http://www.khilafah.com/clarifying-the-meaning-of-dar-al-kufr-a-dar-al-islam/ Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts