Jump to content

Gay Marriage


Recommended Posts

 

I'm not against gay people or a gay couple having the same legal rights as a married hetro couple, but the act of marriage is a union between a man and a woman and should stay that way IMO..

 

Instinctively I'm inclined to agree with that Mal. But the definition of marriage you have given is one from religion. I'm not a religious man, but I still choose to follow the cultural traditions of my fundamentally Christian country. Is that wrong? Is wanting to follow my culture's traditions wrong? Traditions like church weddings etc may owe a lot to our religious roots (Christian as well as pagan) but they have become part of our culture, which is about far more than what god you pray to, it's about who we are as a nation. The finer details may be tweaked to suit but the culture remains.

 

If the Gays want to marry, they seem to have as much right as the atheists.

I think homosexual people have it fairly good, it's not a criminal offence and they can form a civil partnership...... I'd say society has been as accepting as it can be.

 

If however we are saying they should be able to because they were born that way and it's their natural behaviour then I have to ask, how could you refuse the longings of any other type of sexual deviant or cleptomaniac or anyone else for that matter?

 

Allowing them acceptance into society is surely the logical conclusion of that argument ?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 218
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Its this wishy washy hippy " turn the other cheek " cobblers that got us into the trouble our societies are now in with immigration......30 years ago some of us were ranting and raving about it but ot

I love these gay bashing threads LOL As some may know, my lad is gay, civil partnership, live in a nice house on a nice estate, both professionals, make no secret of it but don't flaunt it. Just 2 a

Next thing you know it will be peados making the case for "well I was born this way so I have right" type nonsense.......they tried before and if we keep making the abnormal normal then they will have

Posted Images

 

 

I'm not against gay people or a gay couple having the same legal rights as a married hetro couple, but the act of marriage is a union between a man and a woman and should stay that way IMO..

Instinctively I'm inclined to agree with that Mal. But the definition of marriage you have given is one from religion. I'm not a religious man, but I still choose to follow the cultural traditions of my fundamentally Christian country. Is that wrong? Is wanting to follow my culture's traditions wrong? Traditions like church weddings etc may owe a lot to our religious roots (Christian as well as pagan) but they have become part of our culture, which is about far more than what god you pray to, it's about who we are as a nation. The finer details may be tweaked to suit but the culture remains.

 

If the Gays want to marry, they seem to have as much right as the atheists.

I think homosexual people have it fairly good, it's not a criminal offence and they can form a civil partnership...... I'd say society has been as accepting as it can be.

If however we are saying they should be able to because they were born that way and it's their natural behaviour then I have to ask, how could you refuse the longings of any other type of sexual deviant or cleptomaniac or anyone else for that matter?

Allowing them acceptance into society is surely the logical conclusion of that argument ?

That is the next logical destination with that line of thought Wilf, I agree. So where do we as society draw the line at what is acceptable and what is not... Well for the most part I'd say where a behaviour, sexual or otherwise, is directly and unsolicitadely harmful to one of the party's involved. Otherwise I consider it none of societies business and should be down to the freedom of the individual.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

I'm not against gay people or a gay couple having the same legal rights as a married hetro couple, but the act of marriage is a union between a man and a woman and should stay that way IMO..

Instinctively I'm inclined to agree with that Mal. But the definition of marriage you have given is one from religion. I'm not a religious man, but I still choose to follow the cultural traditions of my fundamentally Christian country. Is that wrong? Is wanting to follow my culture's traditions wrong? Traditions like church weddings etc may owe a lot to our religious roots (Christian as well as pagan) but they have become part of our culture, which is about far more than what god you pray to, it's about who we are as a nation. The finer details may be tweaked to suit but the culture remains.

 

If the Gays want to marry, they seem to have as much right as the atheists.

I think homosexual people have it fairly good, it's not a criminal offence and they can form a civil partnership...... I'd say society has been as accepting as it can be.

If however we are saying they should be able to because they were born that way and it's their natural behaviour then I have to ask, how could you refuse the longings of any other type of sexual deviant or cleptomaniac or anyone else for that matter?

Allowing them acceptance into society is surely the logical conclusion of that argument ?

That is the next logical destination with that line of thought Wilf, I agree. So where do we as society draw the line at what is acceptable and what is not... Well for the most part I'd say where a behaviour, sexual or otherwise, is directly and unsolicitadely harmful to one of the party's involved. Otherwise I consider it none of societies business and should be down to the freedom of the individual.

 

 

so beastiality would be fine if we could somehow prove the animal didn't mind?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

I'm not against gay people or a gay couple having the same legal rights as a married hetro couple, but the act of marriage is a union between a man and a woman and should stay that way IMO..

 

Instinctively I'm inclined to agree with that Mal. But the definition of marriage you have given is one from religion. I'm not a religious man, but I still choose to follow the cultural traditions of my fundamentally Christian country. Is that wrong? Is wanting to follow my culture's traditions wrong? Traditions like church weddings etc may owe a lot to our religious roots (Christian as well as pagan) but they have become part of our culture, which is about far more than what god you pray to, it's about who we are as a nation. The finer details may be tweaked to suit but the culture remains.

 

If the Gays want to marry, they seem to have as much right as the atheists.

I think homosexual people have it fairly good, it's not a criminal offence and they can form a civil partnership...... I'd say society has been as accepting as it can be.

If however we are saying they should be able to because they were born that way and it's their natural behaviour then I have to ask, how could you refuse the longings of any other type of sexual deviant or cleptomaniac or anyone else for that matter?

Allowing them acceptance into society is surely the logical conclusion of that argument ?

That is the next logical destination with that line of thought Wilf, I agree. So where do we as society draw the line at what is acceptable and what is not... Well for the most part I'd say where a behaviour, sexual or otherwise, is directly and unsolicitadely harmful to one of the party's involved. Otherwise I consider it none of societies business and should be down to the freedom of the individual.

so beastiality would be fine if we could somehow prove the animal didn't mind?

If someone wants to f**k their animals then that's their f****d up business. I'm a bit more concerned about people being harmed than animals. Personally I'd be of the opinion animals can't give consent so should be left well alone, same as children. Edited by Born Hunter
Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't care less, mainly because everyone I know who has had a church wedding is just doing it for the 'show' (especially the women)

Big dress, expensive suits, limos, horse drawn carriages & all the rest of the bullshit that go's with it.......I don't know anyone that wanted gods blessing haha.....cost a fcuking fortune, get in loads of debt ( ironically for gods blessing ) & in many cases split up in a year or so.....haha....

It's a modern fcuking sham!........gays are fcuking welcome to it & I hope it grates on all the god fearers nerves hahaha.....

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to say our kid was gay from day one I shit you not :laugh:

 

I've told him straight (lol no pun) I will never accept Poofs having kids and he is defo one of these "fabulous" types that thinks the world is their stage. One time the cnut just lept in the air and did the splits and ripped his pants.. On the fuuckin metro here in barca.... so I slapped him :laugh: now the bitch has a hump with me lol

 

As Gnasher said..... attention seeking ;)

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't care less, mainly because everyone I know who has had a church wedding is just doing it for the 'show' (especially the women)

Big dress, expensive suits, limos, horse drawn carriages & all the rest of the bullshit that go's with it.......I don't know anyone that wanted gods blessing haha.....cost a fcuking fortune, get in loads of debt ( ironically for gods blessing ) & in many cases split up in a year or so.....haha....

It's a modern fcuking sham!........gays are fcuking welcome to it & I hope it grates on all the god fearers nerves hahaha.....

true, :thumbs: but suppose its the woman you marry today, as in my day I got hitched in 1982, and my wife wanted all the hype that goes with it lol. But I get the feeling today , a lot of young people arnt that bothered and just live together anyway, and use there money on other things than this expensive hype . But in saying this my 28 year old son did get married last year after being together near 3 years , his wife 24 . I was quite surprised as only 1 of his mates are married , his other mates/girlfriends just live together .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't have a problem with folk being gay......don't want to see any kissing or f**k all on a night out but if they keep that indoors then who cares.

As for getting married I think they shouldn't be allowed. They're only doing it because at the moment 'they can't'. Makes a mockery of the marriage vows and the reasons for marriage for me.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

louie spencer has you in stitches? he makes me feel ill lol. gays are more likey than average to be drug abuses, self harm, syffer mental disorders, be peadophiles etc. everything about them from how they speak and act to what they wear is just so in your face, in general they have no class just over the top flamboyancy. their full existence is defined by their sexual preferences making sure everyone is aware they are gay. plus they all have aids.

:laugh::laugh::laugh:

 

Cheers, D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...