R.s.p.c.a case Lurcher man needs help!

[paulus 26]

Do they not need some conversion course?? Mental health nurse and social workers do.. Just the laws and legislation are different..

 

It appears thare are seperate qualifications in English, Scottish, and UK Law. If a Lawyer is qualified in UK Law, he/she can practice anywhere in the UK.

 

Cheers

 

When i was arresed in scotland i had to wait 5 hours for a lawyer to come from durham as scottish solicitors are only qualified in scotish law and english lawyers in english law. Military personnel are under english law so an english law qualified lawyer had to be called.

 

 

Cant argue with Sacs cover. 30 quid a year and got somebody to call who WANTS to help you.

£26

[B.P.R 2,798]

Do they not need some conversion course?? Mental health nurse and social workers do.. Just the laws and legislation are different..

 

It appears thare are seperate qualifications in English, Scottish, and UK Law. If a Lawyer is qualified in UK Law, he/she can practice anywhere in the UK.

 

Cheers

 

 

When i was arresed in scotland i had to wait 5 hours for a lawyer to come from durham as scottish solicitors are only qualified in scotish law and english lawyers in english law. Military personnel are under english law so an english law qualified lawyer had to be called.

 

 

Cant argue with Sacs cover. 30 quid a year and got somebody to call who WANTS to help you.

£26

 

Free

[paulus 26]

Do they not need some conversion course?? Mental health nurse and social workers do.. Just the laws and legislation are different..

 

It appears thare are seperate qualifications in English, Scottish, and UK Law. If a Lawyer is qualified in UK Law, he/she can practice anywhere in the UK.

 

Cheers

 

 

When i was arresed in scotland i had to wait 5 hours for a lawyer to come from durham as scottish solicitors are only qualified in scotish law and english lawyers in english law. Military personnel are under english law so an english law qualified lawyer had to be called.

 

 

Cant argue with Sacs cover. 30 quid a year and got somebody to call who WANTS to help you.

£26

 

Free

i carnt beat that

[whippet 99 2,613]

Do they not need some conversion course?? Mental health nurse and social workers do.. Just the laws and legislation are different..

 

It appears thare are seperate qualifications in English, Scottish, and UK Law. If a Lawyer is qualified in UK Law, he/she can practice anywhere in the UK.

 

Cheers

 

When i was arresed in scotland i had to wait 5 hours for a lawyer to come from durham as scottish solicitors are only qualified in scotish law and english lawyers in english law. Military personnel are under english law so an english law qualified lawyer had to be called.

 

 

Cant argue with Sacs cover. 30 quid a year and got somebody to call who WANTS to help you.

i speak to the lord ,...........and it dont cost a thing, just nature taking its course...........

[J Darcy 5,871]

Hope for the best, prepare for the worst. guys.

Get medical records for your dogs, don't keep dodgy photos on your computer and especially not your phone. These new GPS phones not only store the time and date but also location of where the photo is taken.

Most important of all these days is insurance, I'm with SACS. I hope I never need it, but if I do then it's there.

[baw 4,360]

I thought you'd left JD? First me, then rfyl, now you back...... The love triangle is complete

[cocker 2,654]

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

 

 

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and exp

ression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers

 

 

It would be hard to think of a charity that stirs more controversy than the RSPCA. Whole websites are dedicated to it, smarting with injustice, bristling fur balls of virtual rage. The webmasters are not frustrated badger-baiters, dog-eaters or seal-clubbers thirsting for blood. They are animal lovers in the full, mildly eccentric British tradition of enjoying the company of other species rather more than their own, and placing animal welfare at the top of the moral pyramid. But it’s “welfare” that is the problem. Welfarists believe they have a duty of care to wild, domestic and companion animals, which, crudely put, means treating them kindly. Against this school of thought stands the rights movement, which rejects human exploitation of animals in all its forms: as meat, pet, workhorse, laboratory tool, racer, fighter, public exhibit, performer or quarry in the hunt. It is towards this school of thought that the RSPCA, amid much well-publicised clamour, has shifted its ground. This places in the front line every cat- and dog-owner but especially pet shops, a point made clear by the RSPCA in a letter to local authorities in 1999. “The RSPCA,” it said bluntly, “is opposed to the sale of animals in pet shops.” It is this demonisation of the trade, and what critics regard as the harassment of individuals, that has done more than anything to widen the rift. Any allegation of cruelty by one person against another is likely to result in the appearance of a police lookalike demanding to inspect or even seize their animals. Widespread misunderstanding of the Animal Welfare Act means that many pet-owners do indeed believe RSPCA inspectors have the power to do this. It is a misapprehension that the organisation finds convenient and which it seems in no hurry to correct. As the spokesman said, “We would prefer you didn’t publish that.”

It is a position that many might applaud. Legal nicety versus relief of animal suffering? It’s a no-brainer. But it’s not always as simple as that. Conflict arises because the police, who do have bona-fide powers of entry, have neither the resources nor the expertise to enforce the act. For this reason, says Chris Newman, chairman of the Federation of Companion Animal Societies, enforcement defaults to the RSPCA. “They impersonate police officers and commit trespass. People do believe they have powers of entry.”

Nigel Weller, a solicitor based in Lewes who specialises in defending RSPCA prosecutions, puts it more strongly: “In every single case I’ve been involved in, they have abused their power.” Often, he says, the RSPCA ask police to attend, ostensibly to avoid a breach of the peace. “Then they argue it was a police officer, acting legally, who seized property, when in fact it was the RSPCA.” As RSPCA prosecutions are brought privately and do not require the sanction of the Crown Prosecution Service, this raises issues both of accountability and conflict of interest.

Sally Case, head of prosecutions, insists that RSPCA inspectors are trained specifically to make clear to pet-owners that they have no such right. They act without an owner’s permission, she says, “only if an animal is suffering in a dire emergency. If the court feels evidence has been wrongly obtained, it can refuse to admit it”.

Edited January 5, 2013 by cocker

[dytkos 17,536]

Good post Cocker

 

Cheers, D.

[cocker 2,654]

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

 

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and exp

ression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers

 

 

the thing is with the rspca they are a charity, they are 1 charity of 170,905 charities based in the UK alone,the list is dominated by major health charities, such as Cancer Research UK and MacMillan; global development groups Save the Children, Oxfam and the British Red Cross; and animal charities such as the RSPCA and the RSPB. "Humans, birds and animals" gather together in the top 10. the rspca are not "ACCOUNTABLE" like other organisation ie the police,

 

the rspca break rules and bend rules, and use ignorance and lies to try to mitigate themselves, and they are cheating the ignorant people who donate money to them,

for 15 years i worked in a slaughterhouse on the killing line, but now i work on broiler poultry farms as a stockman, (i see things every day what would make the public run away or pass out,) the birds all go to major high street supermarkets kfc etc, via transportation to factory slaughter plants, the rspca have never come and checked anything yet while i have been doing this type of work. their seal of approval is on the packaging of a lot of supermarket meat,which has been produced by companies i have worked for, for over 17 years,The RSPCA is not there for "all creatures great and small" when they enter into financial business arrangements with the very industry that breeds, confines, mutilates and kills animals. The RSPCA's 'Paw of Approval' scheme is an absolute betrayal to the defenceless animals. The animals are often suffering while the public (who trust the RSPCA to help and save animals) is deceived.

 

but the public eye is not really focused on this type of cruelty, unfortunately for us lads it's hunting which is at the frontline, the general public haven't got a clue

Edited January 5, 2013 by cocker

[cocker 2,654]

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

 

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and exp

ression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers

 

 

THE RSPCA THOUGHT IT WAS OK TO KILL 10 GERMAN SHEPHERD DOGS WITH A SLAUGHTERMANS CAPTIVE BOLT GUN

 

RSPCA puts down 10 German Shepherds with bolt gun - Telegraph

Edited January 5, 2013 by cocker

[the big chief 3,099]

THE RSPCA THOUGHT IT WAS OK TO KILL 10 GERMAN SHEPHERD DOGS WITH A SLAUGHTERMANS CAPTIVE BOLT GUN

 

RSPCA puts down 10 German Shepherds with bolt gun - Telegraph

that is shocking rspca doing what they wont yet again

[cocker 2,654]

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

 

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and exp

ression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers

 

 

'Captive bolts are not used for euthanasia of dogs in WSPA projects, and not listed as an acceptable method for euthanasia in the WSPA guidance (on the International Companion Animal Management'

Edited January 5, 2013 by cocker

[cocker 2,654]

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

 

 

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and exp

ression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers

 

 

good link for looking at more rspca wrong doing WSPA

[baldockbanks courser 598]

You can cram loads of chickens in a shed, never turn the lights of then after there very short, day light free lives kill them as long as it feeds are over crowded country.

 

Yet if you got caught rearing and training birds to fight how ever well looked after they were and your the lowest of the low.

[cocker 2,654]

You can cram loads of chickens in a shed, never turn the lights of then after there very short, day light free lives kill them as long as it feeds are over crowded country.

 

Yet if you got caught rearing and training birds to fight how ever well looked after they were and your the lowest of the low.

 

from 1 day old, broiler chickens are only kept for 34 days old, before slaughter they are fed on a diet to make them 2.2 kilos at 34 days old, resulting in birds that are unable to stand. and this is approved by rspca freedom foods

Edited January 5, 2013 by cocker