Jump to content

neems

Members
  • Content Count

    4,005
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by neems

  1. I've had loads and never paid one,call or write them and tell them to stop as it's becoming harassment and that you're willing to go to court. Then they usually get a debt recovery company to send letters,do the same with them and it stops. Or at least it has with me.
  2. We had them near here a couple of weeks ago,they left bags of shit all over the place and were setting fires everywhere. How much common sense does it take to realise they're only making life hard on themselves? 99% of people wouldn't care at all if they just threw all their shyt away instead of all over the floor.
  3. Stick up a pic of the finished product Francie.
  4. They can only legally shoot a dog for worrying stock. But as we all know that doesn't always stop them.
  5. neems

    Hiit

    That doesn't sound good to me,if you're feeling very sick for a while after and getting dizzy. It's up to you,but I'd feel daft having a debilitating heart attack while trying to get fit
  6. He's a lucky lad,I think I literally would have killed to have a well bred little mooching dog of my own as a youngster.
  7. I'll probably have 1 for my next lurcher,easy to get on with and being fairly durable are high on my list. If I can get out with the dog every day in lots of different places,because it's naturally biddable and easily controlled around game and rarely injured,it'll see more work and be a better dog than a more highly strung and driven one would be (in my hands). That's my theory anyway.
  8. He was a fat old man himself who was clueless when it came to MMA,his experience in K1 taught him absolutely nothing,he couldn't defend from anything that he hadn't seen in boxing. Not even high kicks.
  9. Not always the case copper top...
  10. It is,but putting someone on the ground can be dangerous for everyone involved,nutters carry knives and needles etc and there are drugs which you can absorb through their sweat,I can see why they'd want to keep their distance in this case. The problem is the police are often not held accountable like they should be,but they can't just send them out with a stick and radio anymore imo.
  11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics 'Epigenetic changes modify the activation of certain genes, but not the genetic code sequence of DNA. The microstructure (not code) of DNA itself or the associated chromatinproteins may be modified, causing activation or silencing. This mechanism enables differentiated cells in a multicellular organism to express only the genes that are necessary for their own activity.' Dogs will have some dormant instincts that make them want to act like wolves,which if activated in the parents will pass on,which I'm sure would effect behaviour. And th
  12. I'd go for a spaniel or spaniel x terrier for a dog purely for bushing. But there's loads of breeds will do the job, i'd stay away from any pure terriers or bull breeds,they can be more trouble than they're worth imo.
  13. Or what the Police say The Hillsborogh Justice Campaigners, who recently got justice, will vouch for that. Fair point, the police are not always in the right I accept... But... They surely didn't just roll up to his house for no good reason and think, "f**k it i fancy zapping a black fella tonight." I sympathise with some cops, f****d if they do, f****d if they don't. Should have had the mufty squad on him with riot shields. No sleep for 4 days, he had pulled a dyalasis tube from himself and stumbling about. A man can kill another man by knocking him out and he hits his head on th
  14. It's getting ridiculous,we're too tolerant of this sort of crime and owners are too tolerant of dogs in general. A dog that acts aggressive to a child should be in the ground that same day,and if it attacks anyone especially a child,without due cause the owner should be locked up. It's not a case of better understanding dog psychology,with a strong lead,prong collar and muzzle I could walk the most dangerous psychopathic dog through a city centre every day of the week for it's entire life without incident. It's irresponsible retards whether they're chavs,young pakis or middle aged chi
  15. They could just have been bad examples,if I had any interest in getting one I'd try to get out with a few good ones. I was just curious.
  16. What are the GWP's temperament's like? Are they easily trained and generally easy to get on with? I've seen a couple of GSP's and both struck me as a being nervy,in fact one unexpectedly went for my lurcher and when it got a bit back it ran off into the distance with it's tail between it's legs and took us about 3 hours to find.
  17. It's not exactly a ban,but you can get 4 years in prison for selling,importing or making a knife that fits the new criteria.
  18. You're probably right,but the stupid wording of the legislation means a lot of other knives are banned now too. I don't really care about those stupid film style knives,just that it effects other types too.
  19. But take a look at the wording of the amendments mate,it's worth baring in mind,especially for you.
  20. 'the "vast majority" of knife crimes involved kitchen knives, but zombie knives had "suddenly become very popular as a sign of bravado in gangs".' Which obviously effects me in my low crime,99% white area. I'll feel much safer knowing that the apes will be more likely to kill each other with machetes than 'zombie knives' from now.
  21. Another brilliantly ambiguous law enforced on us,it might effect anyone who collects knives on here. Some tactical knives have logos(or maybe even their brand name) which could suggest it's intended to be used for violence,and if it has a serated back and an edge on the front you can go to prison for selling it.
  22. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37080682 Amendments: In paragraph 1, after sub-paragraph ® insert— “(s)the weapon sometimes known as a “zombie knife”, “zombie killer knife” or “zombie slayer knife”, being a blade with— (i)a cutting edge; (ii)a serrated edge; and (iii)images or words (whether on the blade or handle) that suggest that it is to be used for the purpose of violence.”.
  23. I think it already had hold of his head by that point,he probably didn't know what was going on. Although he did report the dog,not for being dangerous but for being a banned breed,so..... at least a touch of karma involved there. Would you still say that if the dog had killed one of your children? Of course not,but anyone who grasses on someone for having a dog that fits the DDA's 'type' (I didn't see any claim it was dangerous before hand) deserves a kick in the bollocks,obviously not this. Maybe 'irony' would have been a better word than karma. Maybe he thought that the snarli
  24. I think it already had hold of his head by that point,he probably didn't know what was going on. Although he did report the dog,not for being dangerous but for being a banned breed,so..... at least a touch of karma involved there. Would you still say that if the dog had killed one of your children? Of course not,but anyone who grasses on someone for having a dog that fits the DDA's 'type' (I didn't see any claim it was dangerous before hand) deserves a kick in the bollocks,obviously not this. Maybe 'irony' would have been a better word than karma.
×
×
  • Create New...