You could ask them both to send you samples. If youve never had the Oak bark its worth the money and I dont think you would regret it though. I thought it was dearer than Sedgwicks but I havnt bought any off them for a bit.
Yes I would say so, but Im no expert. I think the Oakbark beats them all though really but it is is pricey, but then thats because it takes longer to tan. It just gets better with age.
Yes mate? this belt is off a Abbey harness back because they were not getting the backs coming in from Sedgwicks. It was a bit cheaper aswell. I believe the bloke who owns Abbey is also one of the Sedgwick owners..
I bought the Harness back cos its longer and you can get 6ft leads off it.
Really enjoyed that thanks. I saw Clarrisa at the Waterloo cup and spoke to her, she was very nice. That high tensile stirrup leather is the Greasy Oak bark I think. You cant get better for collars and belts. Its not dyed at all.
I had my hw100 .177 tuned by Ratworks. Its now 250bar and the light cylinder does surprisingly make a big difference although I never thought of the gun as heavy. Ive had lots of rifles come and go but the HW100 is a constant. I would say the tune has benefitted the gun and well worth the money but is no way a necessity.
Yeah get a crease mate, they are easy to use with a bit of practice. Got some nice buckles there. Ive used the stirrup ones but not the other ones, they look old, what are they?
Thanks mate, yes its Greasy Oakbark stirrup type leather. Its not dyed any colour but coloured by all the grease and oils that they rub in. Its thick but very supple.