Born Hunter
-
Content Count
17,839 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by Born Hunter
-
You've been watching that seaspiricy shite haven't you? LOL
-
So like I said then!
-
Again, do you have a source. Because I've just looked at an fda source which says atlantic mackerel have the same mercury content as whiting and haddock etc. Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish (1990-2012) WWW.FDA.GOV Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish from 1990-2012 by Species
-
If you go and die from covid now I'm never going to hear the f***ing end of it! Or a blood clot for that matter. LOL
-
Its a fact of life that every action we take has a risk associated. But it doesn't help anyone spreading misstruths. Swordfish is of particular concern but it's wouldn't stoped me ordering it in the restaurant or even killing one for my own freezer if I got the chance. Blue water spearos who target them are on another level! Great stuff.
-
There's a handful of similar species that do mate.
-
King mackerel, not the ones we catch on feathers. We're talking about mercury right? You got a source for any of this?
-
Yeah but now folks are saying it's altering the RNA and that sounds like DNA, so new conspiracy.... LOL There's absolutely nothing that any of us could say to explain concerns that would change minds.
-
No mate, I haven't a clue how it works. Please tell me more...
-
I don't think it's a simple as "oily fish". You're pretty safe with mackerel and salmon no? My understanding was that it's mainly large predatory blue water fish like swordfish that have concerning concentrations of certain toxic minerals. Which makes sense really from an evolutionary point, we didn't evolve hunting the open oceans. Then again the japs do fine on it. Which just highlights how f***ing complex nutritional science is and how prone it is to folks becoming zealots.
-
If you say so. Lol.
-
We've done this dance before. The evidence doesn't support that conclusion.
-
Yeah crunchy peanut butter. Goes lovely with bananas. I buy it by the kg!
-
The incidence rate of blood clots is like 4 in a million. Covid infection fatality rate rate is around 1 in 100. Surely you are helping society! Unless you don't believe in herd immunity?
-
And who were the main culprits for vocally spreading that myth? The reasoning is simple... Even young people are statistically MUCH safer being vaccinated than catching covid. And if you say that the chance of catching covid is tiny now, then I'd say it's tiny because of people willing to be vaccinated. As I've said all along, the infection fatality rate doesn't concern me personally, getting vaccinated is civic duty.
-
Mate! There’s a f***ing huge difference between those two realities! You can’t crack on making leaps like that.
-
Show me where faucci says it WAS made in a lab instead of that they can’t rule out that it was...
-
I don’t take offence but equally I don’t think your view of scientists is fair. I believe progress is an inevitability but scientists are no more the cause of it than soldiers are the cause of war. Competition drives both. Scientists are generally extremely ethically aware. The most famous quote of Oppenheimer personifies that statement. I doubt if any of the minds that developed the bomb wanted fate to play out that way but when the greatest mind of all time pens a letter to the allies telling them of his concern of hitlers new weapon project, what is the option? Competition makes such t
-
Who's 'They'? The main establishments are not saying it was made in a lab. They're simply saying it shouldn't be ruled out, like it was. You're getting ahead of yourself. It's being investigated further. As I said it doesn't matter how it came about really. They can and are literally studying it.
-
I never bothered commenting to this claim on the other thread but theres no proof it was made in a lab. Theyve simply reconsidered their view that the evidence suggests it wasnt. The claims you are making are a big leap from the actual facts. Not that it makes any difference whether or not the virus is out of a wet market or out of a lab to how we deal with it.
-
First off. I've just realised you're on about rna vaccines specifically. I was talking about viral vectors and the like, like the Oxford one. To be clear, Rna vaccines tell your body to make a protein that looks like the virus and your immune system react to that, to my understanding. The rna vaccines are amongst the most effective produced for this virus. So no I don't believe they're not accurate enough. And the viral vectors literally use a slice of the virus. If I was to dare to speculate on the cause of second jab side effects then I'd suspect that it's the body literally boosti
-
It totally kills me. LOL
-
The actual vaccine itself.
-
It's building up antibodies to the vaccine, which is sufficiently similar to the virus to make them effective against it too.
-
Yes, the immune system detects a pathogen and sets about dealing with it in a series of reactions. A lot of symptoms to either a natural pathogen, like a virus, or an unnatural one like a vaccine, are the result of the innate immune system doing it's job. But the innate immune system isn't what vaccination is trying to stimulate. Immunity is gained by stimulating the adaptive immune system. I can't speak with any degree of confidence on why the second jab sometimes might cause a stronger reaction than the first. All I can do is speculate which probably won't help anything.
