-
Content Count
24,041 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
145
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by gnasher16
-
You piss off !!.....If your keeper hadnt played out of his skin....and we had someone who could put the ball in the net it would of been a cricket score..............and no im not bitter and twisted not one bit Shame to see such a nice big ground like that not even half full,if it wasnt for our turn out of fans youd of thought it was a pub league crowd ! But fair do,s hope you continue to do well.
-
Listen treacle if everyone spoke proper like what we does.........there wouldnt be a problem........ I find British accents quite fascinating......some are pleasant,catchy,even soothing.....................yet others i want to cave the persons head in just for talking
-
Well,unless that was somebody else bashing the mouse....then it really was his accent.........overtaking in tractors,smacking mice,no wonder they say its grim up north if thats how they get their thrills
-
Something about the Manc Derby just doesn't quite add up!
gnasher16 replied to rob190364's topic in General Talk
He,s pointing at Lescott saying " you cannot have people this ugly playing football....send him off " -
Probably got done over the day before by some gangbanging homeboys so thought he would take it out on some 14 year olds...............c**t !
-
What a spastic..... what could anyone get from filming themself overtaking a tractor in another tractor then posting it on the internet .....where the f**k is that accent from as well he sounded a right retard !
-
Think id rather pay the 60 quid than make a c**t of myself like that ! Im no fan of ol bill but i feel for them having to deal with prats like that without getting physical.
-
So.......somebody rapes your daughter or mrs......you go round and purposely kill the person..................and YOU get the death sentance.......no its not simple is it,and thats why the death penalty will never and can never be brought back.
-
Way over the top that....the annual cost to keep someone in prison is around the 40k mark.
-
I cant believe what im reading here .....Wilf,my fellow East End Hammer,follower of the finest traditional football club in London,loyal soldier standing shoulder to shoulder on the Bobby Moore stand in rain and snow...........................................and it turns out all this time your from bandit country !!!!......Cant get much more Millwall than Deptford no wonder you was getting attacked with knives running round the old kent road in an Irons shirt
-
Didnt see this reply.....totally agree .......theres no room for sentiment in a title chasing team and on what i saw today thats all it is.
-
I think its sometimes best not to get too wrapped up in statistics they rarely tell the truth......i might be wrong but i think they class a completed pass as a pass that your team mate touches before your opponent does simple as that......from the bits ive seen of that game today there was a lot of times where Scholes put his team mate in trouble,yes it was a completed pass but not a good one and one that did more harm than good........these little 10 foot passes sideways and backwards dont make a great player from what ive seen Scholes looked heavy legged and out of touch.
-
I dont think the blacks themselves really know what they want to be called anymore mate..............some of them are being dragged along in this insanity and are just as confused as we are. I totally agree about the " fat b*****d " thing as well.....i mean whats more offensive and hurtful,shouting out the colour of somebodies skin ( which they already know )....or shouting out a personal insult ( that they might not know ). The longer this all go,s on the more it will turn normal everyday folk into " racists ".....theres only so much that folk are willing to accept.... and when you try to f
-
...Tried that one mate....errrrrrrm.....it didnt quite work out
-
Kahn claims interference with judges in his last fight
gnasher16 replied to Malt's topic in General Talk
I cant help thinking this has all got a touch of desperation about it......I personally thought Khan nicked it but when its close like that i dont think you can argue too much.....but immediately after the fight Khans camp was kicking up a stink about one thing or another.......its almost like they was desperate to find something legitimate to create about,and now they,ve eventually found it ! Officials of governing bodies are always jumping up and down at fights its nothing new......though i do think that judges should have absolutely no contact with anybody throughout the duration of a figh -
Only played once in about 10 years Bobby Zamora scored 2 on route to a nice 4 - 2 win i remember it well .......nope i have every confidence in the boys tomorrow
-
Id like the big football club to win anyway never mind them 2 silly clubs i saw Dagenham & Redbridge hold Millwall to a goalless draw today....and tomorrow its up the m1 to Hillsborough for a nice little 1 nil away win.......oh its tough at the top City 1 United 1 would be my bet.
-
This is the type of thing that gets people down....when folk make excuses for the obvious truth or plain ignore the truth for fear of offending somebody..........so is it only blacks who are " poor,alienated,with hopeless futures " ?.......blacks are implicated in more crimes than whites because percentage wise blacks commit a far higher number of crimes than whites do.....you might not like that but its the truth......black youths are 6 times more likely to commit crime than white youths.......now if you take into account that blacks as an ethnic minority group make up less than 4% of the uk
-
I dont feel sorry for them for any other reason than the fact that if they had killed a white boy instead of a black boy we wouldnt even know their names !....We all have to accept that if we,re caught we have to take the punishment.....but punishment by a jury is one thing,punishment by an entire nation is something different altogether,and not right.
-
1....Correct,all bad laws should be changed.....but surely 800 years is rather a long time to recognise and change a bad law im sure you would agree....hence its my belief that the timing of the change being during a high profile case involving a black man wasnt just coincidence....it was bending over backwards to help the poor repressed black man. 2....I didnt know Lawrence,maybe you did as you think he was a clever lad......do you think this 19 year old lad was clever enough to understand the whole civil rights/black power thing.....after all this is England a predominantly white christian
-
Im no law student so im sure the other chap will know more than i do......but i think you,ll find we do have a mickey mouse version of what the yanks call the 6th ammendment...i forget what we call it now......and your right Wilf it certainly wasnt put into force in the Lawrence case.......what also should be taken into account in my opinion is the fact that 16 years ago when they were first tried there was nowhere near the mass frenzy of obssessive " race issues " that there is today......in the last 10 years we as a society have become utterly deranged as regards anything that could be terme
-
Its only 100 % correct if the 2 cases are 100% the same and they are not.....its like comparing football and rugby,both use a ball and both are sports but thats where the comparisons end..... Im no expert so im certainly not saying im completely right.....but as many folk know when your backs against the wall you learn the law real quick ...admittedly my troublesome days were a long time ago but im pretty sure that a true double jeopardy case means a re-trial of the same crime and the same plea.......which the Lawrence case was,albeit through new evidence......the Dunlop case was NOT the sam
-
Must admit im a soft touch i find it hard to walk passed a white Englishman living rough in the same areas i grew up in......watching foreigners coming out of their houses getting into cars with a full stomach i find hard.......putting a coat on the back of some poor sod in our own neighborhoods i dont find hard at all if we cant look after our own people when we can we,ve got no hope !
-
From my understanding the difference between the Lawrence case and the case Gin is talking about is that in the Lawrence case the Macpherson Report directed that an aquitted suspect could be re-tried IF new evidence was found.................whereas in the Dunlop case he actually confessed after getting aquitted first time round and pleaded guilty in a re-trial as well as being done for purgery............so although Dunlop was the first to be convicted ( in 2005 ) it was under different circumstances..........the Lawrence case has been described as " One of the most important moments in the m
-
Right i got you mate ....i thought you meant they have learned by their mistake so shouldnt get banged up....my mistake.......whatever way you look at it they,re going to have a rough ride inside......no thanks to the media hysteria over the last 20 years !!
