Jump to content

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

The press is focusing on whether Starmer knew he had failed the vetting procedure.

But we all knew he was a wrong un! He'd been sacked twice for dishonesty. ( An undeclared dodgy loan and  putting pressure on others to arrange passports for super rich pals) .  He was always going to fail vetting even without his Epstein links.

The whole country knew he was a dishonest, smarmy reptile. He should never have been considered for any job in government and possibly prosecuted for his past dishonesty .

This business of politicians reinventing themselves after being sacked  is a farce. It's like being put in the naughty corner for a few months until a new job in government comes up.

Just watching him on his address to the house, squirming like a worm on a hook

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Add to that the King and the Prince of Wales on their non stop arse kissing tour of Muslims….Id say it’s about time we replaced the lot of them !

Heard that, apparently we must all be willing to make sacrifices. Him and his kind will be sacrificing feck all.

Posted Images

32 minutes ago, mel b said:

IMG-20260420-WA0001.jpg

Aye, he's that useless, he,s made prime minister wi thousands in salary, trouser pockets heaving wi cash, free this n that when he ventures out wi myrtle.thumping great salary awaits him, aye he's useless alright, 🙋

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mandelsons links to Epstein probably made him the perfect guy for the job!

Controversial take maybe but if he was able to leverage that relationship to the benefit of our country then I can see why he was appointed.

And if it forces an early election then even better!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Born Hunter said:

Mandelsons links to Epstein probably made him the perfect guy for the job!

Controversial take maybe but if he was able to leverage that relationship to the benefit of our country then I can see why he was appointed.

And if it forces an early election then even better!

I think that's the truth of it. I think his recruiters thought......

Who  can massage Trump's towering ego?

Who has a grovelling and fawning personality?

Who is completely amoral?

Who thinks decency and standards are for naive people?

Who is  corruptible in the extreme and can turn a convenient blind eye to f****n anything, providing his palm is greased?

Why. Step forward  Peter himself.

He was a no brainer.

Edited by jukel123
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, jukel123 said:

I think that's the truth of it. I think his recruiters thought......

Who  can massage Trump's towering ego?

Who has a grovelling and fawning personality?

Who is completely amoral?

Who thinks decency and standards are for naive people?

Who is  corruptible in the extreme and can turn a convenient blind eye to f****n anything, providing his palm is greased?

Why. Step forward  Peter himself.

He was a no brainer.

Sickeningly true juke 👍.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...