Francie, 3,062 Posted April 7 Report Share Posted April 7 Starmer an his party have voted against the ban on first cousin marriage lol ffs 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 53,444 Posted April 7 Report Share Posted April 7 34 minutes ago, Francie, said: Starmer an his party have voted against the ban on first cousin marriage lol ffs Add to that the King and the Prince of Wales on their non stop arse kissing tour of Muslims….Id say it’s about time we replaced the lot of them ! 8 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bob.243 10,478 Posted April 9 Report Share Posted April 9 “Tonight Matthew, I’m going to pretend to be an international statesman, responsible for peace in the The Middle East” 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bendigo 2,539 Posted Wednesday at 21:29 Report Share Posted Wednesday at 21:29 5 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bakerboy 4,951 Posted Thursday at 22:29 Report Share Posted Thursday at 22:29 Throwing a top civil servant under a bus to save his slimey scaly skin, fckn reptile 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 18,181 Posted Friday at 08:25 Report Share Posted Friday at 08:25 If this doesn’t set alarm bells ringing! Jesus Christ. 91K views · 521 reactions | Just in case you missed it - this is the... WWW.(!64.56:886 Just in case you missed it - this is the Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff failing to confirm that the British... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 53,444 Posted Friday at 08:38 Report Share Posted Friday at 08:38 11 minutes ago, Born Hunter said: If this doesn’t set alarm bells ringing! Jesus Christ. 91K views · 521 reactions | Just in case you missed it - this is the... WWW.(!64.56:886 Just in case you missed it - this is the Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff failing to confirm that the British... Are you shocked at that mate ?…..I’d be surprised if you are. Id have thought it was all completely self evident for minimum the last 5 years ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 53,444 Posted Friday at 08:38 Report Share Posted Friday at 08:38 10 hours ago, Bakerboy said: Throwing a top civil servant under a bus to save his slimey scaly skin, fckn reptile The only comfort is that the c**t probably needed sacked anyway ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 18,181 Posted Friday at 08:48 Report Share Posted Friday at 08:48 5 minutes ago, WILF said: Are you shocked at that mate ?…..I’d be surprised if you are. Id have thought it was all completely self evident for minimum the last 5 years ? I pay more attention to the RAF and RN tbh but I assumed we had the capability to deploy at least a single battlegroup! I knew the army is particularly f****d but we might as well completely close shop if we can’t deploy a battlegroup. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 53,444 Posted Friday at 08:54 Report Share Posted Friday at 08:54 5 minutes ago, Born Hunter said: I pay more attention to the RAF and RN tbh but I assumed we had the capability to deploy at least a single battlegroup! I knew the army is particularly f****d but we might as well completely close shop if we can’t deploy a battlegroup. I’d have said when we didn’t have aircraft to put on 1 aircraft carrier that was a massive clue ! lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tatsblisters 11,508 Posted Friday at 09:01 Report Share Posted Friday at 09:01 Just goes to show the state of our democracy and the political class Starmer should have been gone faster than the morning dew. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
.357shooter 1,530 Posted Friday at 09:11 Report Share Posted Friday at 09:11 His head would have been on a spike back in the day. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 18,181 Posted Friday at 09:11 Report Share Posted Friday at 09:11 13 minutes ago, WILF said: I’d have said when we didn’t have aircraft to put on 1 aircraft carrier that was a massive clue ! lol I think the ability to deploy a battlegroup is way more fundamental than deploying a carrier strike group tbh. Carrier strike is premier league stuff and there is a ramp up period where all the parts are coming together. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 53,444 Posted Friday at 09:18 Report Share Posted Friday at 09:18 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Born Hunter said: I think the ability to deploy a battlegroup is way more fundamental than deploying a carrier strike group tbh. Carrier strike is premier league stuff and there is a ramp up period where all the parts are coming together. Sorry if it sounded like I was being a smart arse with you mate, that wasn’t my intention….my point was, it just speaks to the wider state of the military when you can’t even do something as basic as put aircraft on an aircraft carrier…..it’s akin to saying “look at our new tank…..hasnt got any tracks yet because we can’t afford them but it’s smart isn’t it !” lol Obviously I talk to Stiff on an almost daily basis and when you hear how much time he spends pushing water uphill and some of the utter “you couldn’t make it up” stuff and then expand that out you know we are in rag order….. Edited Friday at 09:25 by WILF 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.