WILF 50,221 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 Don't worry, tomorrow you will all be calling traveller kids scum about something I'm sure. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
keepdiggin 9,566 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 Love reading Wilf's posts says it how most see it but are to scared to say it 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lenmcharristar 10,294 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 hey bdg why not donate a couple of your houses for the cause sure your on here preaching the gospels of the labour left? isn't that what corbinlid wants to do? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,437 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 All of my properties are occupied, I don't own whole blocks of flats that are left standing empty pal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lenmcharristar 10,294 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 All of my properties are occupied, I don't own whole blocks of flats that are left standing empty pal. lolol just as expected. is there a single owner or all individual owners? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king 12,030 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 I reckon fitting large sprinklers to the outside of the buildings which have that type of cladding on is the answer.say every 1/4 Of the way up. So the water runs down the cladding. I would imagine there's a good few buildings in the UK with that type of flammable cladding. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lenmcharristar 10,294 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 I reckon fitting large sprinklers to the outside of the buildings which have that type of cladding on is the answer.say every 1/4 Of the way up. So the water runs down the cladding. I would imagine there's a good few buildings in the UK with that type of flammable cladding. that's true king, but surely that type of cladding would be better off dumped, it should never have been passed. especially with todays health n safety 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,437 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 Over 100 buildings with the same cladding I heard on the news, feel for anyone living in one of those buildings I wouldn't be able to settle knowing what could happen... Surely the best option is to just remove the cladding and replace it with the fire resistant stuff though? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Qbgrey 4,277 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 we,ll see what started that fire,id lay a fair bet it was a overloaded extension lead,asians,are notorious for plugging 500 sockets into one lead. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 29,577 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 we,ll see what started that fire,id lay a fair bet it was a overloaded extension lead,asians,are notorious for plugging 500 sockets into one lead. This guy is still insisting it was his faulty fridge.... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4609268/Cabbie-faulty-fridge-started-inferno-devastated.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Qbgrey 4,277 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 we,ll see what started that fire,id lay a fair bet it was a overloaded extension lead,asians,are notorious for plugging 500 sockets into one lead. This guy is still insisting it was his faulty fridge....http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4609268/Cabbie-faulty-fridge-started-inferno-devastated.html i knew you,d reply mate,you and me both know that extension lead hobny with Asians. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king 12,030 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 I reckon fitting large sprinklers to the outside of the buildings which have that type of cladding on is the answer.say every 1/4 Of the way up. So the water runs down the cladding. I would imagine there's a good few buildings in the UK with that type of flammable cladding. that's true king, but surely that type of cladding would be better off dumped, it should never have been passed. especially with todays health n safetyI agree it should be dumped and replaced.But that will take a good few yrs to do I would imagine. But as a temporary measure an outside sprinkler system would be better than nowt. They could probably do 1 tower block in a week I would think. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 I reckon fitting large sprinklers to the outside of the buildings which have that type of cladding on is the answer.say every 1/4 Of the way up. So the water runs down the cladding. I would imagine there's a good few buildings in the UK with that type of flammable cladding. that's true king, but surely that type of cladding would be better off dumped, it should never have been passed. especially with todays health n safetyThe cladding, insulation, electrical and other systems that were fitted would comply with "today's" H&S requirements - the work was only done a year ago !The council wants a job doing, lays down a minimum standard that meets legal requirements and the firm that submits the lowest bid gets the job - you pay peanuts, you get monkeys ! 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 I reckon fitting large sprinklers to the outside of the buildings which have that type of cladding on is the answer.say every 1/4 Of the way up. So the water runs down the cladding. I would imagine there's a good few buildings in the UK with that type of flammable cladding. that's true king, but surely that type of cladding would be better off dumped, it should never have been passed. especially with todays health n safety The cladding, insulation, electrical and other systems that were fitted would comply with "today's" H&S requirements - the work was only done a year ago ! The council wants a job doing, lays down a minimum standard that meets legal requirements and the firm that submits the lowest bid gets the job - you pay peanuts, you get monkeys ! So, that's why the (more expensive !) fire retardant cladding wasn't used - welcome to the wonderful world of competitive tendering..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,437 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 Isn't the area where the flats burned down a labour controlled constituency, perhaps they had the work done on the cheap to keep some money back for the next wave of immigrants that will demand housing It's a Tory controlled council and has been for years and up until June 8th the MP had been a Tory for years too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.