Channel 4. Interview With A Murderer

[mattyg 1,862]

Bmx or unicycle? Lol

I personally agree with the innocent until proven guilty!

Matt

[walshie 2,804]

Bmx or unicycle? Lol

I personally agree with the innocent until proven guilty!

Matt

 

He can't be proven guilty if he hasn't been taken to court but look at the facts.

 

Car

Uniform

Sold his shotgun shortly after the murder

Stashed antiques in someones shed

Washed his jumper which disappeared

Murdered someone else with a shotgun

Scored very high on the psycho test

Wife thinks he did it

Daughter thinks he had something to do with it

Raving loon

 

You'd be hard pushed to prove him innocent. And he IS a convicted murder after all.

[mattyg 1,862]

Trial by TV can never be a good thing, he ain't right but that dosnt mean hs guilty.

I'm sure the truth will out sooner or later.

Matt

[walshie 2,804]

Well it hasn't for the last 38 years, but i reckon they will re-open the case now.

 

P.S. hang him!

[Kay 3,709]

I watched it last night & tbh I Thought that Wilson choreographed the whole thing... the big thing for me was when he took spencer to the old road he & Carl's family lived in.. you could see that Spencer was uncomfortable & he distanced himself from Carl when Wilson asked if Carl had played out on the front with the other kids in the street... spencer said all the kids looked the same & he didnt take any notice of them . which is fair enough .. if i was asked to identify next doors kid in a group of other kids the same sex & age I would struggle because I dont take any notice of them .

 

MY theroy is that Wilson knew Spencer would gravitate towards the one person who he knew was an Allie at the time & gave him his alibi.. the secretary ... so low & behold he goes & requests a stop off at her home.

 

But the old dear was lead by Wilson when he asked if she was sure if Bert hadnt gone out for lunch.... ffs she must have been if she was a day ... I dont think the police will re open the case unless theres some forescics that proove beond a doubt that spencer killed the lad

 

I dont think spencers the killer i do think he was at the farm with the old boy who he killed a year later robbing the place & the old boy shot carl , i know that some of you shotgun lads will put me right , but if bert had sneeked out of work early afternoon ... robbed the farm & got disturbed by carl who he knew would have recognised him so shot him in the head at point blank range ... wouldnt spencer have been covered in blood

 

So much blood that he would have had to strip off his uniform & probably get in the bath & bin his clothes & then go back to work .... could spencer have spent the whole morning in the bog as he claimed he did at work because he was worked up about the planned robbery at the farm & it all went terribly wrong when he & possibly the old boy where disturbed

 

One thing thats not clear is why did he take a shotgun from the farm on the evening he shot the old boy in the head .. why did he saw the barrell off ... if he was angry because of the '' special cocktail'' he offered his wife ... why not just shoot him there & then in a fit of rage ....

 

Why didnt his ex wife speak up sooner if she thought he was involved ... spencer had all but paled into insignificance untill he contacted wilson because he has a book to sell

 

Me thinks its all back fired a wee bit ... the end

[boyo 1,398]

As already said i think its bit him in the arse & imho i think he's guilty as sin & also the farmer he shot was either in on it or put 2 & 2 together. Horrible bloke !!

[mackem 30,372]

As already said i think its bit him in the arse & imho i think he's guilty as sin & also the farmer he shot was either in on it or put 2 & 2 together. Horrible bloke !!

His own daughter suspected something,but if he keeps schtum he will take it to his grave a free though worryingly disturbed man.

[Greyman 32,582]

Well it hasn't for the last 38 years, but i reckon they will re-open the case now.

 

P.S. hang him!

when they re open the case make sure you come forward with all the hard facts and concrete evidence you have collected, and you may get your wish, but don't turn up in court with a heavily edited one sided bit of media nonsense sensationalism from the telly, or people might laugh at you and call you a weirdo, due to the contents of that programme and the reaction of people like yourself, the guy will never get an unbiased jury and for that reason will probably not stand trial,

[walshie 2,804]

 

Well it hasn't for the last 38 years, but i reckon they will re-open the case now.

 

P.S. hang him!

when they re open the case make sure you come forward with all the hard facts and concrete evidence you have collected, and you may get your wish, but don't turn up in court with a heavily edited one sided bit of media nonsense sensationalism from the telly, or people might laugh at you and call you a weirdo, due to the contents of that programme and the reaction of people like yourself, the guy will never get an unbiased jury and for that reason will probably not stand trial,

 

 

The Hunting Life defence brief has spoken. Who rattled your cage? Can't we have opinions now?

 

Hang him!

[bird 10,014]

I watched it last night & tbh I Thought that Wilson choreographed the whole thing... the big thing for me was when he took spencer to the old road he & Carl's family lived in.. you could see that Spencer was uncomfortable & he distanced himself from Carl when Wilson asked if Carl had played out on the front with the other kids in the street... spencer said all the kids looked the same & he didnt take any notice of them . which is fair enough .. if i was asked to identify next doors kid in a group of other kids the same sex & age I would struggle because I dont take any notice of them .

 

MY theroy is that Wilson knew Spencer would gravitate towards the one person who he knew was an Allie at the time & gave him his alibi.. the secretary ... so low & behold he goes & requests a stop off at her home.

 

But the old dear was lead by Wilson when he asked if she was sure if Bert hadnt gone out for lunch.... ffs she must have been if she was a day ... I dont think the police will re open the case unless theres some forescics that proove beond a doubt that spencer killed the lad

 

I dont think spencers the killer i do think he was at the farm with the old boy who he killed a year later robbing the place & the old boy shot carl , i know that some of you shotgun lads will put me right , but if bert had sneeked out of work early afternoon ... robbed the farm & got disturbed by carl who he knew would have recognised him so shot him in the head at point blank range ... wouldnt spencer have been covered in blood

 

So much blood that he would have had to strip off his uniform & probably get in the bath & bin his clothes & then go back to work .... could spencer have spent the whole morning in the bog as he claimed he did at work because he was worked up about the planned robbery at the farm & it all went terribly wrong when he & possibly the old boy where disturbed

 

One thing thats not clear is why did he take a shotgun from the farm on the evening he shot the old boy in the head .. why did he saw the barrell off ... if he was angry because of the '' special cocktail'' he offered his wife ... why not just shoot him there & then in a fit of rage ....

 

Why didnt his ex wife speak up sooner if she thought he was involved ... spencer had all but paled into insignificance untill he contacted wilson because he has a book to sell

 

Me thinks its all back fired a wee bit ... the end

well watched it, and everything points to spencer , his car, his uniform , he knew carl , he killed before with shotgun . the only thing that baffles me is the other 4 were they there on the same day in the house, or were they never there, and only roped in because they were known criminals around that area .??

[Nicepix 5,650]

 

I watched it last night & tbh I Thought that Wilson choreographed the whole thing... the big thing for me was when he took spencer to the old road he & Carl's family lived in.. you could see that Spencer was uncomfortable & he distanced himself from Carl when Wilson asked if Carl had played out on the front with the other kids in the street... spencer said all the kids looked the same & he didnt take any notice of them . which is fair enough .. if i was asked to identify next doors kid in a group of other kids the same sex & age I would struggle because I dont take any notice of them .

 

MY theroy is that Wilson knew Spencer would gravitate towards the one person who he knew was an Allie at the time & gave him his alibi.. the secretary ... so low & behold he goes & requests a stop off at her home.

 

But the old dear was lead by Wilson when he asked if she was sure if Bert hadnt gone out for lunch.... ffs she must have been if she was a day ... I dont think the police will re open the case unless theres some forescics that proove beond a doubt that spencer killed the lad

 

I dont think spencers the killer i do think he was at the farm with the old boy who he killed a year later robbing the place & the old boy shot carl , i know that some of you shotgun lads will put me right , but if bert had sneeked out of work early afternoon ... robbed the farm & got disturbed by carl who he knew would have recognised him so shot him in the head at point blank range ... wouldnt spencer have been covered in blood

 

So much blood that he would have had to strip off his uniform & probably get in the bath & bin his clothes & then go back to work .... could spencer have spent the whole morning in the bog as he claimed he did at work because he was worked up about the planned robbery at the farm & it all went terribly wrong when he & possibly the old boy where disturbed

 

One thing thats not clear is why did he take a shotgun from the farm on the evening he shot the old boy in the head .. why did he saw the barrell off ... if he was angry because of the '' special cocktail'' he offered his wife ... why not just shoot him there & then in a fit of rage ....

 

Why didnt his ex wife speak up sooner if she thought he was involved ... spencer had all but paled into insignificance untill he contacted wilson because he has a book to sell

 

Me thinks its all back fired a wee bit ... the end

well watched it, and everything points to spencer , his car, his uniform , he knew carl , he killed before with shotgun . the only thing that baffles me is the other 4 were they there on the same day in the house, or were they never there, and only roped in because they were known criminals around that area .??

 

 

That's what used to happen before the Police and Criminal Evidence Act came out. Police could lock anyone up for three days without telling anyone, solicitors, family, nobody. They could do what they liked back then. They would round up known criminals and fudge the evidence to suit.

[Greyman 32,582]

 

I watched it last night & tbh I Thought that Wilson choreographed the whole thing... the big thing for me was when he took spencer to the old road he & Carl's family lived in.. you could see that Spencer was uncomfortable & he distanced himself from Carl when Wilson asked if Carl had played out on the front with the other kids in the street... spencer said all the kids looked the same & he didnt take any notice of them . which is fair enough .. if i was asked to identify next doors kid in a group of other kids the same sex & age I would struggle because I dont take any notice of them .

 

MY theroy is that Wilson knew Spencer would gravitate towards the one person who he knew was an Allie at the time & gave him his alibi.. the secretary ... so low & behold he goes & requests a stop off at her home.

 

But the old dear was lead by Wilson when he asked if she was sure if Bert hadnt gone out for lunch.... ffs she must have been if she was a day ... I dont think the police will re open the case unless theres some forescics that proove beond a doubt that spencer killed the lad

 

I dont think spencers the killer i do think he was at the farm with the old boy who he killed a year later robbing the place & the old boy shot carl , i know that some of you shotgun lads will put me right , but if bert had sneeked out of work early afternoon ... robbed the farm & got disturbed by carl who he knew would have recognised him so shot him in the head at point blank range ... wouldnt spencer have been covered in blood

 

So much blood that he would have had to strip off his uniform & probably get in the bath & bin his clothes & then go back to work .... could spencer have spent the whole morning in the bog as he claimed he did at work because he was worked up about the planned robbery at the farm & it all went terribly wrong when he & possibly the old boy where disturbed

 

One thing thats not clear is why did he take a shotgun from the farm on the evening he shot the old boy in the head .. why did he saw the barrell off ... if he was angry because of the '' special cocktail'' he offered his wife ... why not just shoot him there & then in a fit of rage ....

 

Why didnt his ex wife speak up sooner if she thought he was involved ... spencer had all but paled into insignificance untill he contacted wilson because he has a book to sell

 

Me thinks its all back fired a wee bit ... the end

 

well watched it, and everything points to spencer , his car, his uniform , he knew carl , he killed before with shotgun . the only thing that baffles me is the other 4 were they there on the same day in the house, or were they never there, and only roped in because they were known criminals around that area .??

. I believe they were nicked robbing a farmhouse near the one the boy was killed in,in very simular circumstances a short while after the murder, the police made up a false statement from one of the four, blaming the others for the killing, when they showed the others the statement they all pointed the finger at each other, and that was why they were convicted, I don't think they were the sharpest bunch and easily fitted up, a bit like Barry George the Jill dando fall guy,

[bird 10,014]

 

 

I watched it last night & tbh I Thought that Wilson choreographed the whole thing... the big thing for me was when he took spencer to the old road he & Carl's family lived in.. you could see that Spencer was uncomfortable & he distanced himself from Carl when Wilson asked if Carl had played out on the front with the other kids in the street... spencer said all the kids looked the same & he didnt take any notice of them . which is fair enough .. if i was asked to identify next doors kid in a group of other kids the same sex & age I would struggle because I dont take any notice of them .

 

MY theroy is that Wilson knew Spencer would gravitate towards the one person who he knew was an Allie at the time & gave him his alibi.. the secretary ... so low & behold he goes & requests a stop off at her home.

 

But the old dear was lead by Wilson when he asked if she was sure if Bert hadnt gone out for lunch.... ffs she must have been if she was a day ... I dont think the police will re open the case unless theres some forescics that proove beond a doubt that spencer killed the lad

 

I dont think spencers the killer i do think he was at the farm with the old boy who he killed a year later robbing the place & the old boy shot carl , i know that some of you shotgun lads will put me right , but if bert had sneeked out of work early afternoon ... robbed the farm & got disturbed by carl who he knew would have recognised him so shot him in the head at point blank range ... wouldnt spencer have been covered in blood

 

So much blood that he would have had to strip off his uniform & probably get in the bath & bin his clothes & then go back to work .... could spencer have spent the whole morning in the bog as he claimed he did at work because he was worked up about the planned robbery at the farm & it all went terribly wrong when he & possibly the old boy where disturbed

 

One thing thats not clear is why did he take a shotgun from the farm on the evening he shot the old boy in the head .. why did he saw the barrell off ... if he was angry because of the '' special cocktail'' he offered his wife ... why not just shoot him there & then in a fit of rage ....

 

Why didnt his ex wife speak up sooner if she thought he was involved ... spencer had all but paled into insignificance untill he contacted wilson because he has a book to sell

 

Me thinks its all back fired a wee bit ... the end

well watched it, and everything points to spencer , his car, his uniform , he knew carl , he killed before with shotgun . the only thing that baffles me is the other 4 were they there on the same day in the house, or were they never there, and only roped in because they were known criminals around that area .??

. I believe they were nicked robbing a farmhouse near the one the boy was killed in,in very simular circumstances a short while after the murder, the police made up a false statement from one of the four, blaming the others for the killing, when they showed the others the statement they all pointed the finger at each other, and that was why they were convicted, I don't think they were the sharpest bunch and easily fitted up, a bit like Barry George the Jill dando fall guy,

 

thanks

[mackem 30,372]

Todays papers report plod are taking renewed interest in the case (which probably means one of them watched the program and mentioned in in the nick canteen to his mates).

[Rabbit Hunter 6,613]

I watched it last night. Hes a very strange man. I reckon him and the old boy he shot were robbing the farm when the young lad was shot, and he shot the old boy afterwards as he was afraid of him blabbing. How on earth he got away with it is beyond me.