weasle 1,119 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 At the end of the day its just the internet,But he was a caracter,Somthing this place needs,unless we just read could my bull cross kill a polar bear type threads.Genuine posters on here are getting less and less,seems a shame to ban some one,who at the very least did a bit. Link to post Share on other sites
poacher3161 1,766 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 FFS at least he never threatend any body with violence or made personal remarks on other members familys unlike some. 3 Link to post Share on other sites
brambles 3,067 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Its ok saying he had to go, he may well had to but atleast justify or explain their reasoning??? Link to post Share on other sites
Guest cookiemonsterandmerlin Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 At the end of the day its just the internet,But he was a caracter,Somthing this place needs,unless we just read could my bull cross kill a polar bear type threads.Genuine posters on here are getting less and less,seems a shame to ban some one,who at the very least did a bit. Agree Cookie Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 i dont think whin was malicious in any way,yes he liked to blow his own trumpet rather loudly at times,but i reckon he was at the wind up mostly. surely he wasnt banned for that? i said before he would do my head in if he was like that in person,but somehow i suspect he was nothing like that in the flesh. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
rob190364 2,593 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 hmm, that's a wierd one, quite surprised by that. can anyone shed any light? it's not like he'll have insulted or threatened anyone, that's impossible when the only person you ever mention in your posts is yourself Link to post Share on other sites
GrCh 856 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 to many puffs on here Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Lads, Whin's warning level has been sky high for god knows how long, anybody else would have been booted ages ago. For every helpful post he makes, there are several others scattered about the forum which always lead to pages and pages of silly arguments which often end in the thread starter asking for their topics to be removed. He's been banned for the amount of bollocks which follows him round the forum more than anything else, and IMO it's as much the fault of the people who continually bite back at him and ruin peoples threads. Banning him was a joint decision after several lengthy discussions in the mod section, something which most other banned members never have.. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest cookiemonsterandmerlin Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 (edited) Lads, Whin's warning level has been sky high for god knows how long, anybody else would have been booted ages ago. For every helpful post he makes, there are several others scattered about the forum which always lead to pages and pages of silly arguments which often end in the thread starter asking for their topics to be removed. He's been banned for the amount of bollocks which follows him round the forum more than anything else, and IMO it's as much the fault of the people who continually bite back at him and ruin peoples threads. Banning him was a joint decision after several lengthy discussions in the mod section, something which most other banned members never have.. Based on that then Malt should you looks though and the backbiting members who done it regularly posted against stirred whin ban them. Edited on my phone and weird typo error Atb cookie Edited January 23, 2012 by cookiemonsterandmerlin Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 hmm, that's a wierd one, quite surprised by that. can anyone shed any light? it's not like he'll have insulted or threatened anyone, that's impossible when the only person you ever mention in your posts is yourself lmao Link to post Share on other sites
Moll. 1,770 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 If it was thought Whin was deliberately inciting arguments then fair enough, but if it was because other people did not like him and caused arguments, it is not fair. There are a hell of a lot of worse people on here who do nothing for our way of life that should be banned before Whin, he never posted anything illegal, and was never offensive or threatening to anyone....jmo. 4 Link to post Share on other sites
asanley 1,009 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 It,s a shame , I had a lot of fun giving Whin stick , don,t know about these mythical helpful posts though , the only thing I learned off him was the importance of punctuation . Give the old chap a second chance . 4 Link to post Share on other sites
weasle 1,119 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Funny how all the people that put up threads about whin,either personally attacking,him bullying and laughing him are still on.Is that not as bad as giving a opinion 12 Link to post Share on other sites
Moll. 1,770 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 Funny how all the people that put up threads about whin,either personally attacking,him bullying and laughing him are still on.Is that not as bad as giving a opinion Spot on! Link to post Share on other sites
lurcher330 2,297 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Share Posted January 23, 2012 I get a good laugh out of whin,but how do you know how many warning ye have now that the warn level part is gone Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts