gnasher16
-
Content Count
24,074 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
145
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by gnasher16
-
Personally i dont believe theres a middleweight around at the moment who could stand in front of Golovkin without being ironed out......Billy Joe i dont think has the sheer ability to beat him but what he does have is the right style thats going to beat him.......disciplined stick and move for the full 12 rounds......i genuinely feel he has as good a chance as anyone and a better one than most......but still dont think he would beat him.
-
oh dear oh dear oh dear.......you are aware that just because someone is stronger doesnt necessarily mean they are bigger. oh bollocks you,ve gone and blown my cover i was going to pretend i had a 12 month subscription to Boxing Monthly so i could appear to be on Dogfox,s level of understanding. Once again who is the bigger man " in terms of boxing " as you say.......not a difficult question. You enjoy watching girls bickering....you should hang around outside school playgrounds you could really fill your boots then ...we cant all be sweet angelic figures mate im often having
-
I think the minute you stop trying to look at God as " a man " you start to see things with a clearer mind......ive tried to go to church but i just dont feel comfortable it feels like everyones staring at me although i know they,re not but i guess its an area of life we all have to just figure out on our own.....ive got a little hideaway abroad that i spend a lot of time at and theres a tiny little chapel tucked away up in the hills a few miles away i can sit in there for hours and completely clear my mind.....its then that everything makes sense and regardless of any scientific literature no
-
What you want some as well do you trappy ? f**k it if im going to be the community bully i might as well live up to it.......and you old Scouse geezer sit down and shut up before i break your hip !
-
I'm sure he'll lie awake tonight, worrying about it. I've given him a good telling off, and told him that we're all very disappointed in him....... Theres snot and tears all over my keyboard i cant have a mans cyber suicide on my conscience.......he dont live a million miles from me i,ll nip round in the morning with a nice dippy egg and soldiers and give him a rendition of this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60fqp2rLUR4
-
Bloody hells bells.......are you quite sure it wasnt 846 that have read it ?......i tell you what i,ll " do the like " for you as well......maybe you can break open a bottle of bubbly if we can get you up to 10 by the weekend What you call justifying i call having a conversation but if its all too much for you boss im not entirely sure internet forums are for you.
-
Is Prince Naz a heavyweight......or does he just weigh like a heavyweight ?......f**k it i cant stop myself
-
Dont worry me ol fruit i can live with it.......i suppose i,ll just have to get a subscription to Boxing Monthly and go on some boxing interweb forums and try to reach your level of understanding like i said.......ive already sussed the wind up How should i know i wasnt in the ring....was you ?......as a spectator it looked like Holyfield.....so what. Now come on do the full time/part time fans one or im not playing anymore.
-
Please please please.........don't go yet......please do the one about the full time and part time fans first ?.........a bit lively if you can i can hear the ol woman clanking the plates around so before dinner if possible
-
The funniest part of this post is the fact you dont know why its so funny Oh damn you got me on a technicality......ok then.....in bare knuckle straightener in the car park terms.......who would be the bigger man ? Your entertaining mate i give you that ! Like i said some people need the Zippy and Bungle approach. oooooooh nearly you almost got it then.......i,ll rephrase it for you...... " Golovkin is naturally the bigger man,but on the day of the fight he was still naturally the bigger man "........now repeat after me.....
-
Was he the bigger man at the weigh-in and on the day of the fight? Simple yes or no answer.... No......he just weighed more. By your logic Carl Frampton could outweigh Tyson Fury on the scales and therefore be the bigger man..................if you still refuse to back down/cant work it out.......then im afraid you,ll just have to be left to it as im not about to enter the realms of Zippy and Bungle to explain it !! He weighed more so in boxing terms on the day of the fight he was the BIGGER man.... Terrific we,ve now established that Brook would not have got into the same dinner suit t
-
Do i brag about being an ex football hooligan.....no......do i have a bit of fun and a natter about old times fighting at the football years ago as many people do.....yes......who ever said people who had fights at football were hard cases....or even wanted to be. Look son your obviously beginning to go into meltdown which to be fair was probably expected at some point with some of the daft comments you have made....but before you completely go off the rails please just answer me this.......what exactly is the difference between what you called " full time boxing fans "......and " part tim
-
Dont you two go to work ?.......some of us dont have to be in bed early for school or work we can f**k around talking bollocks till our hearts content get over it
-
Was he the bigger man at the weigh-in and on the day of the fight? Simple yes or no answer.... No......he just weighed more. By your logic Carl Frampton could outweigh Tyson Fury on the scales and therefore be the bigger man..................if you still refuse to back down/cant work it out.......then im afraid you,ll just have to be left to it as im not about to enter the realms of Zippy and Bungle to explain it !! He weighed more so in boxing terms on the day of the fight he was the BIGGER man.... Terrific we,ve now established that Brook would not have got into the same dinner su
-
Is this where we get into the whole " when he didnt have problems " debate again ?........you are aware that opponents can hit back arent you......yes he was technically one of the best ever when nobody was hitting him.......wonderful.
-
Stone me what you getting all excited about if your right about the population of Poles then so be it....yes it surprises me but its no big deal ive been surprised before and ive been wrong before ! I havent picked holes in anything your making out as though Harlow is the new Bronx of Britain and i dont agree its only an opinion mate you dont need to take it as a personal attack !..........500 what....who....where......i very much doubt theres 50 people on here who know where Harlow is never mind 500. I know a few people in Harlow who told me the guy was started on because he wouldnt t
-
Theres just too much to trawl through some folk just have to be left thinking they are right i guess........but these couple of lines above tickled me.......you see in my experience people who have actually done a thing or two....or even know a thing or two.......just dont say things like that......they just dont.
-
Was he the bigger man at the weigh-in and on the day of the fight? Simple yes or no answer.... No......he just weighed more. By your logic Carl Frampton could outweigh Tyson Fury on the scales and therefore be the bigger man..................if you still refuse to back down/cant work it out.......then im afraid you,ll just have to be left to it as im not about to enter the realms of Zippy and Bungle to explain it !!
-
Because i thought it would be the most simplistic way of giving an example to your theory......however.....instead of insulting your intelligence and saying you don't seem to understand im going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say i think your probably just being a little bit mischievous Ive never called him " just a come forward slugger " no.........but if you think a guy who barely ever threw a jab in his entire career and defensively fell to pieces every time he was in trouble in a fight was one of the greatest technical heavyweights of all time........then ok I dont
-
Enough said !
-
Dogfox im not going to get into a shit slinging contest.....i know you think you are right and it all makes sense in your head.....but you are wrong in virtually everything you are saying.......the above being a simple example.............fight day check weigh ins are not to prevent any size advantages they are simply to ensure fighters cant rehydrate more than the allowed %.......its a safety thing. As regards gaining mass on a calorie deficit......again we are talking about lean tissue not muscle mass im not sure you know the difference between how weight/water/conditioning relates to " a
-
Dogfox im not going to get into a shit slinging contest.....i know you think you are right and it all makes sense in your head.....but you are wrong in virtually everything you are saying.......the above being a simple example.............fight day check weigh ins are not to prevent any size advantages they are simply to ensure fighters cant rehydrate more than the allowed %.......its a safety thing. As regards gaining mass on a calorie deficit......again we are talking about lean tissue not muscle mass im not sure you know the difference between how weight/water/conditioning relates to "
-
He makes welterweight the same way any other fighter makes weight....making weight is a science do you think Kell Brook is the only fighter who cuts weight ?.........ive got a lad cutting 15 lb for a kick boxing contest next weekend done correctly he,ll be fine but that doesnt mean he should fight in a higher weight division......if size had no bearing on last nights fight are we to presume Brook cant punch or Golovkin has a granite chin ?.....most top middleweights would of taken Brook into the later rounds where weight plays a big part but Golovkin did what Golovkin does.He cut weight to mak
-
Never mind all that did you put a bet on 5 -1 ?
-
Im not altogether sure what point it is you are trying to make i was actually defending the place as i dont think its particularly bad myself.....my point about travellers is many areas are known for certain ethnic groups Hounslow with Asians,Stoke Newington with Jews for example......to many people Harlow is still associated with travellers whereas you are giving off the impression its now associated with Poles and i just dont buy that......i accept you live there and i dont so you,ll know better but id still be interested to see this stat you came up with as i cant find anything about it any
