Deerhound x greyhound

[chartpolski 30,098]

10 minutes ago, shaaark said:

lol

You know what, charts, I've only ever been to Swansea about 6 or seven times in my life, none of which I was under the age of mid 20's lol

I was there years ago for the wedding of some friends, me and the missus sat on Gower peninsula drinking a bottle of wine and eating fish and chips !I love Wales and was in the Arms Park when Wales beat Germany

And ended up at the docks at the Customs House pub !

The less said about that the better

Cheers.

[The drover 1,692]

9 hours ago, shaaark said:

And yea, let it be known amongst us, that chartpolski is from here on in, known as JOB, amen.

And what of brethren Mick. Known in the new testament as JOBBY

[jukel123 10,484]

11 hours ago, chartpolski said:

Jukel123, this is for you; I’ve studied Adam Smith and his basic tenant was “ the more Labour available to the employer, the lower the wages, the scarcity of Labour to the employer, the higher the wages”.

Yet Labour, and I’m not excusing the Tories, have insisted on flooding the country with cheap overseas labour !

How does that square with Labour ? Or are the modern Labour Party not the party of the British worker ?

Not a poke at you personally , I’d genuinely like your opinion

Cheets.

I am not sure why you would address that question to me in the middle of a lurcher thread. "Jukel this is for you" sounds like a traveller call out. Perhaps you've been drinking. Adam Smith's tenet about supply and demand is an obvious one. You don't need to plough your way the 'The Wealth of Nations' to work that out.

 

1) I've been urging others for decades  to see the surge in immigration, legal and illegal, as a long established  political and economic  manoeuvre by the  business class, aided and abetted  by politicians.....who all piss in the same pot.... to keep wages low and their profits sky high.

I've argued long and hard that Britain has adopted a cheap labour philosophy rather than invest in new technology as our competitors have. 

However, I am not in favour of burning immigrants  or groups of immigrants housed in hotels or elsewhere. Nor am I in favour favour of cutting welfare as Reform are. I don't care if some claims are fraudulent. Financial crime in the top echelons of society dwarfs some benefit claimants  swinging the lead. I do not support attacking poor people. Our welfare bill is not a great as other comparable countries in Europe.

2) I voted for Brexit to limit the number of cheap  workers in order to drive up wages and urged others to do so.

3) I have not voted Labour for over 30 years. Metaphorically read my lips. I do not support the modern  Labour Party. They are traitors to working people. I despise Starmerism. You seemed to suggest on another thread that I secretly support Starmer. Please  understand I do not support Starmer or the Labour Party. I do support Labour with regard to Israel's war. I also support evil, narcissist Trump in his legal action against the BBC. But on most issues I do not support Trump. Far from it. 

4) Equally I despise Reform, its leader and most of its manifesto. 

I hope you do not take grave offence at my somewhat irritated reply.

 

Edited 10 hours ago by jukel123

[Big Ron 1,266]

16 hours ago, The drover said:

Tom from wick that bred the deer x coursing greys had some nice animals. He started using a dog out of tor oh Dartmoor to his greys. I had a phenomenal bitch out that breeding

Which Tom is this ? I spent a lot of time up there late eighties / early 90s 

[Bangersanmash 7,440]

12 hours ago, Black neck said:

Some c u are

FFS here we go again. Get your best fox dog you'll see quality. He hasn't killed one this season MC  That 50 a season lol. 

Edited 11 hours ago by Bangersanmash

[gunter 4,256]

36 minutes ago, Bangersanmash said:

FFS here we go again. Get your best fox dog you'll see quality. He hasn't killed one this season MC  That 50 a season lol. 

He needs a fat lip bangers you should go live in his caravan for a week sort him out try and guide him that's if the boyfriend isn't still living in it lol

[gunter 4,256]

38 minutes ago, Bangersanmash said:

FFS here we go again. Get your best fox dog you'll see quality. He hasn't killed one this season MC  That 50 a season lol. 

He hates to see you on here can't talk nonsense to you he's used to the pupe plus he run himself over with a lawnmower

[gunter 4,256]

1 hour ago, jukel123 said:

I am not sure why you would address that question to me in the middle of a lurcher thread. "Jukel this is for you" sounds like a traveller call out. Perhaps you've been drinking. Adam Smith's tenet about supply and demand is an obvious one. You don't need to plough your way the 'The Wealth of Nations' to work that out.

 

1) I've been urging others for decades  to see the surge in immigration, legal and illegal, as a long established  political and economic  manoeuvre by the  business class, aided and abetted  by politicians.....who all piss in the same pot.... to keep wages low and their profits sky high.

I've argued long and hard that Britain has adopted a cheap labour philosophy rather than invest in new technology as our competitors have. 

However, I am not in favour of burning individual people or groups of people housed in hotels or elsewhere. Nor am I in favour favour of cutting welfare as Reform are. I do not support attacking poor people. Our welfare bill is not a great as other comparable countries in Europe.

2) I voted for brexit to limit the number of cheap  workers in order to drive up wages and urged others to do so.

3) I have not voted Labour for over 30 years. Metaphorically read my lips. I do not support the modern  Labour Party. They are traitors to working people. I despise Starmerism. You seemed to suggest on another thread that I secretly support Starmer. Please  understand I do not support Starmer or the Labour Party.

4) Equally I despise Reform, its leader and most of its manifesto. 

I hope you do not take grave offence at my somewhat irritated reply.

 

Strongly worded reply 

[The drover 1,692]

45 minutes ago, Big Ron said:

Which Tom is this ? I spent a lot of time up there late eighties / early 90s 

He wrote in the EDRD Ron. Stayed in a little row of houses just past wick. He bred deer greys. Then used Robin's dog postie over his greys. 

[Black neck 18,451]

1 hour ago, jukel123 said:

I am not sure why you would address that question to me in the middle of a lurcher thread. "Jukel this is for you" sounds like a traveller call out. Perhaps you've been drinking. Adam Smith's tenet about supply and demand is an obvious one. You don't need to plough your way the 'The Wealth of Nations' to work that out.

 

1) I've been urging others for decades  to see the surge in immigration, legal and illegal, as a long established  political and economic  manoeuvre by the  business class, aided and abetted  by politicians.....who all piss in the same pot.... to keep wages low and their profits sky high.

I've argued long and hard that Britain has adopted a cheap labour philosophy rather than invest in new technology as our competitors have. 

However, I am not in favour of burning immigrants  or groups of immigrants housed in hotels or elsewhere. Nor am I in favour favour of cutting welfare as Reform are. I don't care if some claims are fraudulent. Financial crime in the top echelons of society dwarfs some benefit claimants  swinging the lead. I do not support attacking poor people. Our welfare bill is not a great as other comparable countries in Europe.

2) I voted for Brexit to limit the number of cheap  workers in order to drive up wages and urged others to do so.

3) I have not voted Labour for over 30 years. Metaphorically read my lips. I do not support the modern  Labour Party. They are traitors to working people. I despise Starmerism. You seemed to suggest on another thread that I secretly support Starmer. Please  understand I do not support Starmer or the Labour Party.

4) Equally I despise Reform, its leader and most of its manifesto. 

I hope you do not take grave offence at my somewhat irritated reply.

 

Oh mange tout 

Mange tout 

As the french say 

[Big Ron 1,266]

1 hour ago, The drover said:

He wrote in the EDRD Ron. Stayed in a little row of houses just past wick. He bred deer greys. Then used Robin's dog postie over his greys. 

It must be Tom Riley (RIP) that’s who I use to stay with up there ,he never bred first crosses I’d say they were deerhound types , he did have a few pure ones but were utter shit and one greyhound bitch , he had about 20 dogs of all sorts and use to let them just roam about so when a litter was born the sire was anyone’s guess but there was no saluki in his dogs ???? Just checked with his son def no coursing dog put into his dogs 

He lived in the middle of no where but he wrote in earth dog running dog 

Edited 9 hours ago by Big Ron

[chartpolski 30,098]

2 hours ago, jukel123 said:

I am not sure why you would address that question to me in the middle of a lurcher thread. "Jukel this is for you" sounds like a traveller call out. Perhaps you've been drinking. Adam Smith's tenet about supply and demand is an obvious one. You don't need to plough your way the 'The Wealth of Nations' to work that out.

 

1) I've been urging others for decades  to see the surge in immigration, legal and illegal, as a long established  political and economic  manoeuvre by the  business class, aided and abetted  by politicians.....who all piss in the same pot.... to keep wages low and their profits sky high.

I've argued long and hard that Britain has adopted a cheap labour philosophy rather than invest in new technology as our competitors have. 

However, I am not in favour of burning immigrants  or groups of immigrants housed in hotels or elsewhere. Nor am I in favour favour of cutting welfare as Reform are. I don't care if some claims are fraudulent. Financial crime in the top echelons of society dwarfs some benefit claimants  swinging the lead. I do not support attacking poor people. Our welfare bill is not a great as other comparable countries in Europe.

2) I voted for Brexit to limit the number of cheap  workers in order to drive up wages and urged others to do so.

3) I have not voted Labour for over 30 years. Metaphorically read my lips. I do not support the modern  Labour Party. They are traitors to working people. I despise Starmerism. You seemed to suggest on another thread that I secretly support Starmer. Please  understand I do not support Starmer or the Labour Party.

4) Equally I despise Reform, its leader and most of its manifesto. 

I hope you do not take grave offence at my somewhat irritated reply.

 

I apologise if I have irritated you.

I was probably “multi tasking “ re-reading Smiths ”The Wealth of Nations”, while enjoying a bit of Friday night banter on this thread and saw you were reading it. Perhaps I should have PM’d you or started a new thread.

A mistake I’ll try not to repeat in future.

Cheers.

[gunter 4,256]

44 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

I apologise if I have irritated you.

I was probably “multi tasking “ re-reading Smiths ”The Wealth of Nations”, while enjoying a bit of Friday night banter on this thread and saw you were reading it. Perhaps I should have PM’d you or started a new thread.

A mistake I’ll try not to repeat in future.

Cheers.

What charts take the apology back delete the explaining yourself bit your only human 

[gunter 4,256]

47 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

I apologise if I have irritated you.

I was probably “multi tasking “ re-reading Smiths ”The Wealth of Nations”, while enjoying a bit of Friday night banter on this thread and saw you were reading it. Perhaps I should have PM’d you or started a new thread.

A mistake I’ll try not to repeat in future.

Cheers.

You should organise a chess match to sort this whole job out 

[chartpolski 30,098]

Just now, gunter said:

What charts take the apology back delete the explaining yourself bit your only human 

If I’ve inadvertently offended someone, I hold my hands up and apologise, it’s the gentlemanly thing to do

Cheers.