Load of bollocks

[Bangersanmash 4,606]

Dirty ugly c**ts have took this lads lamp an battery for poaching lamping rabbit's even tho they haven't even caught them on any land just a lamp and a rabbit in back of the van with the dogs . Saying since 1828 it's been against the law for a dog to chase a rabbit ffs what's the world coming to lol. Poor f****r rang his old man to have a word with copper. " Saying that battery's cost me a lot of money I've had to work hard for that copper just laughed on TV proper set of c**ts. It's getting to be a joke. Country side 999 program this was on channel really 

Edited May 15, 2020 by Bangersanmash

[C.green 3,233]

Prob get nfa and gear returned just trying to make an example of the lad because the cameras are there.

[dogmad riley 1,348]

You get them back eventually, just keep pestering them and if they don’t return it ask to speak to someone higher they soon release it.

speaking from experience 

[Bangersanmash 4,606]

Lad got a caution 

[bird 10,014]

pity the lad was on his own, because if he had mate with  him  he could have  took a pic of the arrest  , so that it show the coppers taking his lamp/ battery , if nothing else .! where about was this this  what area .But being honest the lamping game fooked more so if you got a running dog, it was crap  35 year ago , and more so now since the hunting with dogs ban fact . i feel sorry for young people starting out now in this game relay do , if you shoot you get permission  , far easier than with a lurcher.

[keepdiggin 9,567]

38 minutes ago, bird said:

pity the lad was on his own, because if he had mate with  him  he could have  took a pic of the arrest  , so that it show the coppers taking his lamp/ battery , if nothing else .! where about was this this  what area .But being honest the lamping game fooked more so if you got a running dog, it was crap  35 year ago , and more so now since the hunting with dogs ban fact . i feel sorry for young people starting out now in this game relay do , if you shoot you get permission  , far easier than with a lurcher.

You ever had any shit from police Ray while you've been out?

[bird 10,014]

2 minutes ago, keepdiggin said:

You ever had any shit from police Ray while you've been out?

No, had them few times up/down lane looking, just stopped lamping for 10 mins then carried on, once they gone  poss couple mile away. We got stopped one night, by coppers though, we just had a Charlie about 10 mins ago, and a house   bottom of Lane phoned the cops, he said what you been doing we said just looking for rabbits  he said get dogs out he wanted to check them over. Well got dogs out, and feckin Buck jumped over a fence, copper said get rabbits with big thing, I said yeh why not he gets them easy lol. Buck went up to then, copper was fussing him,  he  said gsd in that mate, he was OK then, said on your way, don't lamp  down. here, so maybe we dropped on good copper s who knows? 

[Bangersanmash 4,606]

1 hour ago, bird said:

pity the lad was on his own, because if he had mate with  him  he could have  took a pic of the arrest  , so that it show the coppers taking his lamp/ battery , if nothing else .! where about was this this  what area .But being honest the lamping game fooked more so if you got a running dog, it was crap  35 year ago , and more so now since the hunting with dogs ban fact . i feel sorry for young people starting out now in this game relay do , if you shoot you get permission  , far easier than with a lurcher.

There was 3 pals with him in tranny van 

[poxon 5,879]

Tbh the lad was court bang to rights He couldn’t prove he hadn’t poached the rabbit or he was running on permitted land they got him fair an square nothing wrong with that there doing there job as law enforcement if you break the law you gotta deal with it if they catch ya it’s as simple as that that’s how it is if you can’t deal with loosing expensive lamping equipment or potentially cars crushed an dog’s confiscated then don’t Do it

[dodger 3,454]

2 hours ago, Bangersanmash said:

Lad got a caution 

Out of order it's a shame that the young lad didn't have anybody to point him in the right direction and especially to not except the caution as same as pleading guilty he'l live n learn bless him

[poxon 5,879]

2 hours ago, bird said:

pity the lad was on his own, because if he had mate with  him  he could have  took a pic of the arrest  , so that it show the coppers taking his lamp/ battery , if nothing else .! where about was this this  what area .But being honest the lamping game fooked more so if you got a running dog, it was crap  35 year ago , and more so now since the hunting with dogs ban fact . i feel sorry for young people starting out now in this game relay do , if you shoot you get permission  , far easier than with a lurcher.

Don’t help half the idiots in this game leaving gear they dropped with dogs on land or posting glory photos or vids all over fb there bringing it on there selfs ray they talk to much 

[fred90 3,349]

8 minutes ago, poxon said:

Tbh the lad was court bang to rights He couldn’t prove he hadn’t poached the rabbit or he was running on permitted land they got him fair an square nothing wrong with that there doing there job as law enforcement if you break the law you gotta deal with it if they catch ya it’s as simple as that that’s how it is if you can’t deal with loosing expensive lamping equipment or potentially cars crushed an dog’s confiscated then don’t Do it

isn't it for the police to prove he poached the rabbit and run on ground without permission? what happened to innocent until proven guilty? by the way I haven't seen the programme. 

[Bosun11 537]

16 minutes ago, poxon said:

Tbh the lad was court bang to rights He couldn’t prove he hadn’t poached the rabbit or he was running on permitted land they got him fair an square nothing wrong with that there doing there job as law enforcement if you break the law you gotta deal with it if they catch ya it’s as simple as that that’s how it is if you can’t deal with loosing expensive lamping equipment or potentially cars crushed an dog’s confiscated then don’t Do it

I'd change the last line of your post to 'be better at it, or don't do it'

The real issue is when they confiscate or arrest on the 'likeleyhood' of poaching. It happens and they take from those who wont/cant challenge them on it. Police need to proove he poached it if not on the land.

As a kid, the first two times i was caught red handed, we were released and went right to a soliciter who dealt with these offences, as he usually represents those who were prosecuting. We got there first and he got us off twice (with legal aid). Third time we were a bit late out the cells and they beat us to him and we got a guilty. Recon they tipped the coppers to hold us back...

[poxon 5,879]

1 minute ago, fred90 said:

isn't it for the police to prove he poached the rabbit and run on ground without permission? what happened to innocent until proven guilty? by the way I haven't seen the programme. 

That’s exactly what there doing if he couldn’t prove other wise yeah he could say he found it on the side of the road but there’s obviously a reason for him getting pulled in the first place like someone reported illegal lamping going on a van full of strange guys in a van at night driving about pull them over lamp an dog = bingo it’s hard to prove there not lamping to be honest ain’t it the pigs are not stupid mate they couldn’t give a f**k about a lad an his dogs or his equipment they let the guy off with a caution it’s a simple warning they know mate but couldn’t be assess to pursue any further there hoping the warning sinks in as a deterrent 

[fred90 3,349]

4 minutes ago, poxon said:

That’s exactly what there doing if he couldn’t prove other wise yeah he could say he found it on the side of the road but there’s obviously a reason for him getting pulled in the first place like someone reported illegal lamping going on a van full of strange guys in a van at night driving about pull them over lamp an dog = bingo it’s hard to prove there not lamping to be honest ain’t it the pigs are not stupid mate they couldn’t give a f**k about a lad an his dogs or his equipment they let the guy off with a caution it’s a simple warning they know mate but couldn’t be assess to pursue any further there hoping the warning sinks in as a deterrent 

OK. did they say it was illegal for dogs to chase a rabbit since 1828? or did they quote the without permission bit?