wilbur foxhound 480 Posted May 24, 2016 Report Share Posted May 24, 2016 deely deely me Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shepp 2,285 Posted May 24, 2016 Report Share Posted May 24, 2016 They don't talk much about how there are very few ethnic minorities in the army. There are many more Muslims in ISIS than there are in the British army. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,437 Posted May 25, 2016 Report Share Posted May 25, 2016 They don't talk much about how there are very few ethnic minorities in the army. There are many more Muslims in ISIS than there are in the British army. More Muslims in the Muslim-only ISIS than the multi-faith British Army?! What a shocker! I assume you meant British Muslims in ISIS? Well you'd still be wrong http://www.theguardian.com/news/reality-check/2015/dec/11/donald-trump-needs-check-facts-british-muslims-isis Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sussex 5,803 Posted May 25, 2016 Report Share Posted May 25, 2016 What a good idea , fcuk about with a service that has worked well for the thick end of a hundred years .. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted May 25, 2016 Report Share Posted May 25, 2016 If we are supposed to be blind to colour and treat everyone exactly the same regardless, how do they know there are to many whites in the fire brigade? Or maybe less black guys try to join than white guys? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
David.evans 5,323 Posted May 25, 2016 Report Share Posted May 25, 2016 Good point Some one has done the numbers game , and decided it's to one sided , but no boby is stopping the blacks applying for the jod , May be wouldn't find them tho , in the thick dark smoke Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TUFFTY 1,484 Posted May 25, 2016 Report Share Posted May 25, 2016 I fcukin hate that ugly bitch. If I was to say thered to many black faces I would get called a white supremist. So to me to many white faces is the same. Racist bitch Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted May 25, 2016 Report Share Posted May 25, 2016 They don't talk much about how there are very few ethnic minorities in the army. There are many more Muslims in ISIS than there are in the British army. More Muslims in the Muslim-only ISIS than the multi-faith British Army?! What a shocker! I assume you meant British Muslims in ISIS? Well you'd still be wrong http://www.theguardian.com/news/reality-check/2015/dec/11/donald-trump-needs-check-facts-british-muslims-isis It still pretty close or even correct though...paper has just twisted the figures by saying some have returned and some are dead Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scottish lurcher 185 Posted May 25, 2016 Report Share Posted May 25, 2016 The Royal family is to white Harry should marry a paki isn't the word paki seen as racist now a days like the n word for coloured people ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted May 25, 2016 Report Share Posted May 25, 2016 The Royal family is to white Harry should marry a paki isn't the word paki seen as racist now a days like the n word for coloured people ? Yes i believe it is Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Graham M 36 Posted May 25, 2016 Report Share Posted May 25, 2016 Pakistani's don't mind being called "Paki", because in Urdu the term Paki means "The clean/pure one". I was told this by a young Pakistani lad who I know and he used to laugh at the stupid people who made it into a racist term because they were actually praising him. As for it being illegal to use the word nowadays; just another stick to beat ourselves with and another word for the Muslims to be artificially insulted by. They must lie awake all night thinking up new ways to be offended. G Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDHUNTING 1,817 Posted May 25, 2016 Report Share Posted May 25, 2016 They don't talk much about how there are very few ethnic minorities in the army. There are many more Muslims in ISIS than there are in the British army. More Muslims in the Muslim-only ISIS than the multi-faith British Army?! What a shocker! I assume you meant British Muslims in ISIS? Well you'd still be wrong http://www.theguardian.com/news/reality-check/2015/dec/11/donald-trump-needs-check-facts-british-muslims-isis the article says 750 in isis and 550 in the army dont forget all the muslims hired as interpreters, security etc last few years Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.