greg64 3,021 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 They all need shooting not just the "foreign scumbags" also the Teacher who was kiddy fiddling a 14 year old girl which appears in the same newspaper and the Sunderland footballer strange no mention still suppose they are not foreigners and home grown.Diversity I suppose it should be one law for all with a maximum penalty death by hanging. and the dirty twat wanking himself off in his car outside the mosque when kids were about to come out of school and when approached by women and called dirty just carried on and that appeared in the same newspaper.more diversity,strange you did not mention that article db Why would DB mention any other article? He was replying to this one. Seems whenever DB condemns such attacks he gets turned on for whatever reasons, I will agree with one thing we should be stopping these ignorant foreign fcukers from entering our country, seems we have enough of our own well seen as db mentioned the teacher in the paper and the sunderland footballer in the article and then stated it was strange not to mention them,neither of which we were discussing,i thought I would throw that in the mix,and I agree with db about our home grown sikkos we have a lot of them ,you get bad apples in every barrel ,but it seems to me that there is a lot more rotten apples in the muslim barrel and the muslim barrel is a lot smaller,its a disproportionate amount per population and if you cant see that your the ignorant f****r Its pretty clear to see who is the ignorant f****r I think so you don't think a lot of muslim men seem to think its ok to behave the way they do,why have they been banned from swimming pools in Germany, because a lot of them don't know how to conduct themselves around women/ girls Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDHUNTING 1,817 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm bang out of order for thinking it's wrong to watch a video of a little boy being brutally sodomised by a group of grown men? Give your heads a shake for feck sake Youve twisted it from a "lad" which could be any age (im 33 and have been described as a lad to child and now its a little boy, whether its something he should or shouldnt watch (I wouldnt personally, see what you have done now I feel like I need to defend myself!) Its obvious he hasnt downloaded child porn which is what your insinuating. Your a scumbag. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDHUNTING 1,817 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 who said it was a child pornography video it sounds like there idea of retribution to me ,horrific yes ,but we are talking about people with a medevil mind set, f***ing barbariuns there was a video on here were it showed muslim men taking there pants off to mas rape a couple women in an underpass and they were all filming it laughing, I saw it you probably saw it, that does not mean you or me condone it ,as I,m sure mackem did not condone that From mackem's description it fits the legal definition of child pornography or child sex abuse images, infact it fits the criteria for the worst category of image. Real nasty nonce stuff. What sort of mindset does it take to sit through a video like that? And so by your logic, what kind of person needs to look up the law on child abuse? Ive never felt the need to look at chils sex laws because whatever they are I wont fall foul of them you on the other hand have obviousley studied them in detail.........worrying eh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,437 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm bang out of order for thinking it's wrong to watch a video of a little boy being brutally sodomised by a group of grown men? Give your heads a shake for feck sake Youve twisted it from a "lad" which could be any age (im 33 and have been described as a lad to child and now its a little boy, whether its something he should or shouldnt watch (I wouldnt personally, see what you have done now I feel like I need to defend myself!) Its obvious he hasnt downloaded child porn which is what your insinuating. Your a scumbag. He said a "boy" which folk generally use to refer to children, not "lad" like you said. Who's twisting things? If thinking you have to be sick in the head to watch a video of a boy being brutally raped by a group of men makes you a scumbag then I guess youre right, I am a scumbag. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,437 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 (edited) who said it was a child pornography video it sounds like there idea of retribution to me ,horrific yes ,but we are talking about people with a medevil mind set, f***ing barbariuns there was a video on here were it showed muslim men taking there pants off to mas rape a couple women in an underpass and they were all filming it laughing, I saw it you probably saw it, that does not mean you or me condone it ,as I,m sure mackem did not condone that From mackem's description it fits the legal definition of child pornography or child sex abuse images, infact it fits the criteria for the worst category of image. Real nasty nonce stuff. What sort of mindset does it take to sit through a video like that? And so by your logic, what kind of person needs to look up the law on child abuse? Ive never felt the need to look at chils sex laws because whatever they are I wont fall foul of them you on the other hand have obviousley studied them in detail.........worrying eh. My logic is pretty simple, only wronguns watch videos of boys being raped. I would of thought everyone could agree on that I didn't actually have to look any laws up, just something I remembered from a great documentary on Channel 4 about the special police unit that deals with the dirty nonces that watch videos like this. Edited February 25, 2016 by BGD Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDHUNTING 1,817 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm bang out of order for thinking it's wrong to watch a video of a little boy being brutally sodomised by a group of grown men? Give your heads a shake for feck sake Youve twisted it from a "lad" which could be any age (im 33 and have been described as a lad to child and now its a little boy, whether its something he should or shouldnt watch (I wouldnt personally, see what you have done now I feel like I need to defend myself!) Its obvious he hasnt downloaded child porn which is what your insinuating. Your a scumbag.He said a "boy" which folk generally use to refer to children, not "lad" like you said. Who's twisting things? If thinking you have to be sick in the head to watch a video of a boy being brutally raped by a group of men makes you a scumbag then I guess youre right, I am a scumbag. I misread read, bar that the rest stands, ill bet like me everyone read that and thought not something ill be watching but not for one second did I think he would have watched it for a sexual kick and neither I think did you, yet you still accused him of being a paedophile thats the worst insult you can level at someone, but then you know that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Silversnake 1,099 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm bang out of order for thinking it's wrong to watch a video of a little boy being brutally sodomised by a group of grown men? Give your heads a shake for feck sake Youve twisted it from a "lad" which could be any age (im 33 and have been described as a lad to child and now its a little boy, whether its something he should or shouldnt watch (I wouldnt personally, see what you have done now I feel like I need to defend myself!) Its obvious he hasnt downloaded child porn which is what your insinuating. Your a scumbag.He said a "boy" which folk generally use to refer to children, not "lad" like you said. Who's twisting things? If thinking you have to be sick in the head to watch a video of a boy being brutally raped by a group of men makes you a scumbag then I guess youre right, I am a scumbag. He also mentioned that it happened in public with people walking by doing nothing yet you don't mention anything about that. I find your manipulative ways absolutely pathetic. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,437 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm bang out of order for thinking it's wrong to watch a video of a little boy being brutally sodomised by a group of grown men? Give your heads a shake for feck sake Youve twisted it from a "lad" which could be any age (im 33 and have been described as a lad to child and now its a little boy, whether its something he should or shouldnt watch (I wouldnt personally, see what you have done now I feel like I need to defend myself!) Its obvious he hasnt downloaded child porn which is what your insinuating. Your a scumbag.He said a "boy" which folk generally use to refer to children, not "lad" like you said. Who's twisting things? If thinking you have to be sick in the head to watch a video of a boy being brutally raped by a group of men makes you a scumbag then I guess youre right, I am a scumbag. I misread read, bar that the rest stands, ill bet like me everyone read that and thought not something ill be watching but not for one second did I think he would have watched it for a sexual kick and neither I think did you, yet you still accused him of being a paedophile thats the worst insult you can level at someone, but then you know that. I never accused him of being a paedophile. Sick in the head? Of course. A wrongun? Definitely. But I never said he was a paedophile and I didn't mean to imply it. So who's twisting things again? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
greg64 3,021 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I totally agree with jdhunting you made the guy out to be a peodo on a national forum and that's bang out of order ,you don't get much lower than that Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,437 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm bang out of order for thinking it's wrong to watch a video of a little boy being brutally sodomised by a group of grown men? Give your heads a shake for feck sake Youve twisted it from a "lad" which could be any age (im 33 and have been described as a lad to child and now its a little boy, whether its something he should or shouldnt watch (I wouldnt personally, see what you have done now I feel like I need to defend myself!) Its obvious he hasnt downloaded child porn which is what your insinuating. Your a scumbag.He said a "boy" which folk generally use to refer to children, not "lad" like you said. Who's twisting things? If thinking you have to be sick in the head to watch a video of a boy being brutally raped by a group of men makes you a scumbag then I guess youre right, I am a scumbag. He also mentioned that it happened in public with people walking by doing nothing yet you don't mention anything about that. I find your manipulative ways absolutely pathetic. Anyone that stands by while a child is abused wants stringing up, any right minded person would agree, I'd extended that to anyone that seeks out and watches videos of the same abuse. Would you? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lurcherman 887 13,418 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 Wernt it the jews who made up the holocoust i mean holohoax? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lukey 1,621 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm bang out of order for thinking it's wrong to watch a video of a little boy being brutally sodomised by a group of grown men? Give your heads a shake for feck sake Youve twisted it from a "lad" which could be any age (im 33 and have been described as a lad to child and now its a little boy, whether its something he should or shouldnt watch (I wouldnt personally, see what you have done now I feel like I need to defend myself!) Its obvious he hasnt downloaded child porn which is what your insinuating. Your a scumbag.He said a "boy" which folk generally use to refer to children, not "lad" like you said. Who's twisting things? If thinking you have to be sick in the head to watch a video of a boy being brutally raped by a group of men makes you a scumbag then I guess youre right, I am a scumbag. He also mentioned that it happened in public with people walking by doing nothing yet you don't mention anything about that. I find your manipulative ways absolutely pathetic. Anyone that stands by while a child is abused wants stringing up, any right minded person would agree, I'd extended that to anyone that seeks out and watches videos of the same abuse. Would you? ANYONE who seeks out and watches? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lurcherman 887 13,418 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 BGD you are no longer my fellow dj/weed smoker ?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,437 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm bang out of order for thinking it's wrong to watch a video of a little boy being brutally sodomised by a group of grown men? Give your heads a shake for feck sake Youve twisted it from a "lad" which could be any age (im 33 and have been described as a lad to child and now its a little boy, whether its something he should or shouldnt watch (I wouldnt personally, see what you have done now I feel like I need to defend myself!) Its obvious he hasnt downloaded child porn which is what your insinuating. Your a scumbag.He said a "boy" which folk generally use to refer to children, not "lad" like you said. Who's twisting things? If thinking you have to be sick in the head to watch a video of a boy being brutally raped by a group of men makes you a scumbag then I guess youre right, I am a scumbag. He also mentioned that it happened in public with people walking by doing nothing yet you don't mention anything about that. I find your manipulative ways absolutely pathetic. Anyone that stands by while a child is abused wants stringing up, any right minded person would agree, I'd extended that to anyone that seeks out and watches videos of the same abuse. Would you? ANYONE who seeks out and watches? Well you'd have to be pretty sick to actively seek out videos of a child being raped, don't you agree? Honestly am shocked at the amount of folk on here that think it's fine and normal to sit back with a cup of tea and watch a video of a boy being gang raped. What good reason is there to seek out and watch a video like that? I'm not saying anyone that watches a video like that is a paedophile doing it for sexual gratification but they're not right in the head whatever they watch it for. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lurcherman 887 13,418 Posted February 25, 2016 Report Share Posted February 25, 2016 I seen a brazillian rapist in jail getting a broom stick rammed in his shit box on best gore does that make me werid lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.