stabba 10,745 Posted September 4, 2014 Report Share Posted September 4, 2014 FFS lol..Ian Brady ffs 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted September 4, 2014 Report Share Posted September 4, 2014 you right vixen bunch of ejits Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tsteve9999 456 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 For me it would have to be let the baby live, because you couldn't know what would happen if you changed history. As an example what if Stalin had had free reign and time to build up Russia and then started a war with Europe himself? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lurcherman 887 12,776 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Ban.socks!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted September 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 What a stupid question to ask anyone, I cant believe people are actually replying and trying to justify an answer even scarier that some are replying they would kill a baby ...........there are lots of people that have to deal with jobs on a daily basis that desensitize you from ordinary every day life, who see terrible things on a daily basis, but to ask such a stupid question on a hunting site "in plain English"............. is embarrassingly sinister IMHO Explain to me what's sinister about it vixen ... Its a standard question asked in psychological assesments and fallowing on from the god debate and how strongly people felt I thought it would be good question to see how people thought whether they thought morally or plainly in black and white ... Nothing sinister I am not trying recruite a band of psychos to go on a mass Muslim killing spree ....... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted September 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Next time Socks dont use simple plain English when asking such questions....try and throw a few long words in The hunting/countryside community seems to of gone all middle class lately and cant accept a question at face value its got to be turned into something off the Krypton Factor !! I know mate ... Its a simple enough question ... Yes .. No or don't answer simples ......... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
steven35 30 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Rob the baby help him take over the world how easy it would be if we all spoke 1 language the world would flow steady instead we have to many religions to many wars fighting over different beliefs I say 1 world f**k religion fighting 1 language should make it a better place don't kill Jews or any other just outlaw religion an speak 1 language educate or kill the baby take his place Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,656 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Rob the baby help him take over the world how easy it would be if we all spoke 1 language the world would flow steady instead we have to many religions to many wars fighting over different beliefs I say 1 world f**k religion fighting 1 language should make it a better place don't kill Jews or any other just outlaw religion an speak 1 language educate or kill the baby take his place f***ing hell...... we'd better keep an eye on you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 nwo order nutcase , here you should volunteer for the mark of the beast, the veri chip you cant buy ir sell without it an give up your soveirnty while your at it Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 29,835 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 For me it would have to be let the baby live, because you couldn't know what would happen if you changed history. But you WOULD know what would happen thats what the question is all about !!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vixen 528 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 I said "embarrassingly" sinister socks. Self explanatory really.........embarrassing and sinister that anyone would put a question (psychological assessment or not) on a hunting forum asking who could kill a baby in an absolutely impossible situation that (I can categorically guarantee) will never happen. personally I would assume anyone putting this question to paper or asking this question must be out of their mind or psychologically unstable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flipper_Al 1,012 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Moral dilemmas... have a read here http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animals-and-us/201306/would-you-save-puppy-or-child-burning-building Quote Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 i agree vixen Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lab 10,979 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Relax....it's just a question...lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tsteve9999 456 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 For me it would have to be let the baby live, because you couldn't know what would happen if you changed history. But you WOULD know what would happen thats what the question is all about !!! No mate, thats the whole point. If you change history there would be no guarantee it will be for the better, it could get 10x worse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.