That don't mean it's subsidised though, that just shows the private rental sector and social housing providers have different profit margins.. The whole point of the private housing sector is to make money. The point of the social housing sector is to provide housing. Two totally different things so of course there's going to be disparity between them both..
My point was about subsidised housing though, not whether it was ethical for someone with a big wage to live in low cost housing meant for those who couldn't afford to buy their own place or rent private.. That is a different argument...