mushroom
-
Content Count
19,295 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
21
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by mushroom
-
What telescope would i need to watch a rocket landing on the moon? To watch a rocket land on the Moon in real time with a telescope from Earth is, unfortunately, beyond the capabilities of any commercially available telescope, even high-end observatories. Here's why and what’s possible: Why You Can’t Watch a Rocket Land on the Moon from Earth Distance: The Moon is about 384,400 km (238,855 miles) from Earth. Resolution required: To see a rocket like Sp
-
Now there’s a question. I do and I’m worried. If they make this easily attainable, then they’ll mine old Luna. Who can even conceive the consequences of that?
-
Definition of insanity…. “A Einstein” But let’s all face it, we went to the moon
-
If you hear a splash and you’re in water, git the fack owt if it’s in Northern Territory.. ”Mick Dundee” A scholar, an idol, a leader lol
-
You keep the Hare in your Krishna….. what is your good name sir?
-
Check out Charts peacocking
-
That honestly, I hate to say…. Took me a second
-
‘Kinell I just had a stroke PMSL
-
Let’s stick with Ocum
-
That’s what they’re trying to find. The constants of quantum theory/mechanics/etc. but is everyone now onboard that we went to the moon?
-
Constants are constants they don’t change outside of where they’ve been observed. What science are you questioning?
-
Don't need to mate, scientific facts suit the truth not an agenda
-
They put something out the back of the banger mate lol. Thrust If you have a can of Lynx, when you spray it it gives an opposing force that you are strong enough not to feel the effects of entirely but you can still feel a bit of pressure. Same thing in space would send you on a journey at a good few mph in the opposite direction. Now make that can 5000 times larger in capacity and you're going for a fuucking fast ride
-
It’s a measurement of velocity that can be understood. Mach refers to the sound barrier which technically means you need air or some medium that can carry sound to break it. Mach 1 on earth would be a higher velocity than Mach 1 on Mars Edited; Doh! Not entirely correct lol thinner atmosphere means less energy input to reach Mach velocity.
-
Anddddddd…. touché
-
In the fabrication, planning etc there were a lot more than a few hundred mate.
-
Nah you’ve got to visit places mate. Like Mack said, Vienna is stunning, great place to visit. It’s nice to experience different cultures, food, beer etc
-
As I said… a lesser man
-
Yeah…. But in fairness she had a point… I was hanging out of the back of it… happy memories, no harm in knocking a farewell one out
-
No idea but it looks like she’s drinking an Aperol spritz Vienna is a great place to visit but I wouldn’t want to live there lol Get her to try a keisegrindre (spelling) it’s a hotdog with cheese in the middle. Fuucking lush
-
In a small way (yet accounted for in the maths) yes, the gravity of both bodies assisted the journey. Earth has more mass hence a stronger gravity field/influence. So less fuel for propulsion needed for the return journey
-
I rarely take the normal (for here) 2hours but today just thought fuuck it. 3 courses and a jug of wine please lol
-
I’ve just bought a couple of the grow tubs yesterday (Hawaiian and Mexican) should be fun
-
I’m on a Spanish dinner
-
Yep not many dogs put themselves through pain or take mad risks intentionally and to be clear a good one refers to that intent Never once have I not said I failed the dog. It even says it in that post. A man admits when he’s wrong. A lesser man try’s to use that to seem to be the better Anyway back to the maths and physics of space travel and moon landings. If I put out 5000lbs of thrust, in a vacuum, then I will travel in the opposing direction at that speed (minus a little bit for particles acting in resistance) indefinitely. So once I’m in that vacuum I need very little in the
