But he WAS found guilty !
He was only acquitted at retrial because his defence was based on trashing the young girl's reputation, not because evidence proved that he hadn't done it. Isn't that also unfair ?
But her reputation was not trashed was it? Because she has anonymity, all that done, and the reason it was admissible in court was, to show that she had consenting sex in similar situations after the alleged rape. There by showing that he was within his rights to think the sex was consensual.
And lets not forget she did not make a claim of rape the CPS did.
TC