Starmer

[mackem 31,955]

Reforms fuel protest in London drew 70 people,mostly media.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/reform-uk-fuel-protest-london-nigel-farage-richard-tice-tax-rise-b1280132.html

[kanny 22,024]

What a shitshow lol 

UK Ambassador's Controversial Remarks on US Relationship Overshadow King Charles's Visit | World News - The Times of India

TIMESOFINDIA.INDIATIMES.COM

---

UK News: Leaked comments by UK Ambassador Sir Christian Turner questioning the 'special...

 

[WILF 53,528]

1 hour ago, mackem said:

Reforms fuel protest in London drew 70 people,mostly media.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/reform-uk-fuel-protest-london-nigel-farage-richard-tice-tax-rise-b1280132.html

How seeing those career politicians on that bus making c**ts if themselves don’t make anyone sick in their mouth I just don’t know !……Tice gets a pass, he has been there since the get go but all those other c**ts can f**k off ! 

[iworkwhippets 13,346]

2 hours ago, mackem said:

Reforms fuel protest in London drew 70 people,mostly media.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/reform-uk-fuel-protest-london-nigel-farage-richard-tice-tax-rise-b1280132.html

Lol, eh, everyone's behind their nets macky lad, not like the Irish getting stuck in, rest are on here posting nowhere posts as usual,   That's us Brits for ya eh,

[WILF 53,528]

Farage didn’t vote to investigate Starmer ???!!!!! 
Wonder why his Muslim master told him to do that ?

[mackay 3,890]

9 minutes ago, WILF said:

Farage didn’t vote to investigate Starmer ???!!!!! 
Wonder why his Muslim master told him to do that ?

Maybe suits him to leave Starmer in place, he's the best recruiting officer reform have.

 

[chartpolski 30,381]

11 minutes ago, WILF said:

Farage didn’t vote to investigate Starmer ???!!!!! 
Wonder why his Muslim master told him to do that ?

Did he not vote ? It was pointless,Starmer put a three line whip on his MP’s and they have a massive majority.The motion was never going to pass. Badenoch proposed it knowing full well it would fail but it would make Starmer look like both a coward and a bully.

I think Starmer has played this terribly, he should have referred himself to the Standards committee, now all his opponents can call him a coward. 
Cheers.

[mackem 31,955]

3 hours ago, WILF said:

Tice 

Dubai Dicky can also f**k off,he lost any credibility after the film screening in Trafalgar Square when he referred to all of us in attendance and said Reform wanted nothing to do with any of us,Tice spends a chunk of the year in Dubai ffs moved there to escape paying VAT on private school fees.

Reform we’re expecting a huge turn out for the fuel protest……….70 people.

[chartpolski 30,381]

It’s quite telling that a lot of the Labour MP’s who voted against Starmer or refused to vote were North East MP’s.

Normally a staunch Labour area.

Maybe a clue as to how next weeks local, Welsh and Scottish elections are going to go ?

Cheers.

[jukel123 10,582]

Politicians are made completely differently to the average person. If I had a job in a goldfish bowl environment . Where everybody held me in contempt. Where my continued presence damaged the company I worked for . Where my workmates hated me. Where my dodgy  private life was being aired in court. Where every day was one crisis after another. I would jack and do something else.  Life is too short for that kind of pressure. 

But politicians have to be dragged by their bleeding fingernails out of their jobs. They are weird masochistic feckers. 

Keir Hardie must be resting uneasy at the thought of his namesake inheriting  the Labour Party leadership.

I see at least one union has decreased its contribution to the Labour Party citing lack of support and treachery from Labour. I expect others will follow suit. They were elected because they were not the tories .  But who the f**k are they? Who do they represent?

Edited 15 hours ago by jukel123

[chartpolski 30,381]

Starmer shows huge political naivety with almost every decision.

Kemi, and I’m certainly NOT a supporter, played a blinder by asking for a debate and a vote on whether Starmer should be referred to the Privileges Committee that she knew had no chance of passing but would put Labour and the Speaker in a no-win situation.

Speaker Hoyle couldn’t refuse the request as it would look like he wasn’t impartial and supported Starmer and Labour.

Labour MP’s had the choice to vote with their conscience or toe the Labour line.

Starmer had three choices;

Refer himself to the Privileges Committee, which are predominantly Labour MP’s.

Allow his MP’s a Free vote and hope enough would support him.

Or lay down a Three Line Whip and threaten any Labour MP who voted against him with expulsion.

He chose the third and worst option which makes him look like a coward and a bully and now puts him in the position of sacking the 15 MP’s who voted against him or backing down and confirming he’s a coward .

He fell right into the political trap.

Just my take on it Its a great time to be a political nerd

Cheers.

[jukel123 10,582]

4 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

Starmer shows huge political naivety with almost every decision.

Kemi, and I’m certainly NOT a supporter, played a blinder by asking for a debate and a vote on whether Starmer should be referred to the Privileges Committee that she knew had no chance of passing but would put Labour and the Speaker in a no-win situation.

Speaker Hoyle couldn’t refuse the request as it would look like he wasn’t impartial and supported Starmer and Labour.

Labour MP’s had the choice to vote with their conscience or toe the Labour line.

Starmer had three choices;

Refer himself to the Privileges Committee, which are predominantly Labour MP’s.

Allow his MP’s a Free vote and hope enough would support him.

Or lay down a Three Line Whip and threaten any Labour MP who voted against him with expulsion.

He chose the third and worst option which makes him look like a coward and a bully and now puts him in the position of sacking the 15 MP’s who voted against him or backing down and confirming he’s a coward .

He fell right into the political trap.

Just my take on it Its a great time to be a political nerd

Cheers.

Good times all round. As a fellow political nerd I'm transfixed both at events here and over the pond.Plus  I can't think of a football season with such a gripping end. Top and bottom of the premiership are nail biting. Top of the Scottish premiership is a knife edge. Even Carlisle,  led by Mark Hughes,are in the play offs for promotion from the National league. I'm watching PSG   Bayern at the minute. 5_4 to PSG. My  cup runneth over.

[chartpolski 30,381]

4 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

Good times all round. As a fellow political nerd I'm transfixed both at events here and over the pond.Plus  I can't think of a football season with such a gripping end. Top and bottom of the premiership are nail biting. Top of the Scottish premiership is a knife edge. Even Carlisle,  led by Mark Hughes,are in the play offs for promotion from the National league. I'm watching PSG   Bayern at the minute. 5_4 to PSG. My  cup runneth over.

At the moment I’m finding watching politics more exciting than watching Newcastle, but “non desistas, non exieris “ as they say

Cheers.

[Borr 9,214]

I'm torn between starmer being ousted and leaving him in place for the coup de gràce...

[jukel123 10,582]

21 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

At the moment I’m finding watching politics more exciting than watching Newcastle, but “non desistas, non exieris “ as they say

Cheers.

As I've said in another post, I find the situation in the Strait scary but kind of morbidly fascinating. How long will China put up with its vital oil tankers being held up in the Strait? Or are they getting through? We just don't know. We are only fed  half the story from the media. And even the half we are fed changes according to the individual affiliations of particular media platforms.

Trump's ratings are falling like a stone and his party must be seriously pissed off at their backsides being  on the line just as the mid term elections approach.

Trump and his team could, at any minute, change tack and begin bombing again.Trump is not used to being unpopular and  may try to end the war decisively in order to appear strong and retrieve favour and credibility.

Russia is delighted in selling its oil at bonanza rates.

While Starmer, unsuccessfully tries to garner some popularity and credibility from his indecision and bungling.

All good fun. Kind of.

Edited 14 hours ago by jukel123