The country has woken up.

[mel b 3,478]

[Bangersanmash 4,840]

On 07/08/2024 at 09:00, TRUEBRIT66 said:

Have a lot of time for Nigel Farage but the mans turning into a hypocrite, complaining about him being labelled as a antagonist and the repercussions on him not being fair and then doing exactly the same against Tommy Robinson (45secs).   

For balance Tommy Robinson Latest Message - Exposing P*liticians & Media Lies?! (youtube.com)

Shocking what they've done to Tommy. It's like he said though we need to carry on what he's achieved. Peaceful but annoying protests. At number 10 house of parliament. In their faces. Big numbers. No carrying on giving them what they want. 

[Bangersanmash 4,840]

On 07/08/2024 at 10:31, lurcherman 887 said:

 

What's this say to the british public. We're f****d if we don't do something about it now. The government don't give two fucks about us. Life's cushy for them now & in retirement. Starma has already f****d up. He's got another 4 years to do much more damage if we don't stop him peacefully by numbers turning up at parliament.  Hes still getting paid either way whether he turns the country round or ruins it even more. Just like most government have the last few decades. They don't care one bit. They become political pricks for one reason MONEY 

[Pewit 971]

2 minutes ago, Bangersanmash said:

What's this say to the british public. We're f****d if we don't do something about it now. The government don't give two fucks about us. Life's cushy for them now & in retirement. Starma has already f****d up. He's got another 4 years to do much more damage if we don't stop him peacefully by numbers turning up at parliament.  Hes still getting paid either way whether he turns the country round or ruins it even more. Just like most government have the last few decades. They don't care one bit. They become political pricks for one reason MONEY 

What do you suggest they do? They are not going to start mass deportation of millions of people that haven't done anything wrong. They could make a start by getting stuck in to the backlog that the Tories left behind. 

[Borr 7,576]

4 minutes ago, Pewit said:

What do you suggest they do? They are not going to start mass deportation of millions of people that haven't done anything wrong. They could make a start by getting stuck in to the backlog that the Tories left behind. 

I suggest they leave the ichr , and start mass deportation of illegals, take over all airports and flights and send a strong message to people on boats and people rioting that something is being done

[mackay 3,580]

6 minutes ago, Pewit said:

What do you suggest they do? They are not going to start mass deportation of millions of people that haven't done anything wrong. They could make a start by getting stuck in to the backlog that the Tories left behind. 

Meanwhile in the real world. Why can't they start high number deportations.  You know like the ones who have been denied asylum that never seem to leave and anyone crossing the channel illegally.

[DIDO.1 22,856]

 

 

[Pewit 971]

10 minutes ago, mackay said:

Meanwhile in the real world. Why can't they start high number deportations.  You know like the ones who have been denied asylum that never seem to leave and anyone crossing the channel illegally.

Isn't what the asylum process is supposed to be for? As for those denied and deported, what's to stop them making the crossing again? It's not just as simple as that, a lot of work and thought needs to be put in to measures that will work.

[Pewit 971]

16 minutes ago, Borr said:

I suggest they leave the ichr , and start mass deportation of illegals, take over all airports and flights and send a strong message to people on boats and people rioting that something is being done

That's a suggestion and dependent on whether we are willing to accept the ramifications. As for flights home, if they are here without ID, where do we deport them to? 

[mackay 3,580]

29 minutes ago, Pewit said:

Isn't what the asylum process is supposed to be for? As for those denied and deported, what's to stop them making the crossing again? It's not just as simple as that, a lot of work and thought needs to be put in to measures that will work.

Well seeing as we're told they give the smuggling gangs their life savings to cross In the first instance how could they afford to cross again?.  If they did though, deport again, they'll either catch on or run out of money.

[Pewit 971]

5 minutes ago, mackay said:

Well seeing as we're told they give the smuggling gangs their life savings to cross In the first instance how could they afford to cross again?.  If they did though, deport again, they'll either catch on or run out of money.

But we aren't getting to the root cause, it will still cost millions a year with your proposals. And that still wouldn't prevent illegal asylum seekers as by definition they are illegal if they don't report themselves to the authorities after they make crossing.

[Welsh_red 4,979]

Can we not release sharks into the channell ?

[Lenmcharristar 10,234]

The only deterrent is stopping all benefits for illegals, housing aswell

[mackay 3,580]

8 minutes ago, Pewit said:

But we aren't getting to the root cause, it will still cost millions a year with your proposals. And that still wouldn't prevent illegal asylum seekers as by definition they are illegal if they don't report themselves to the authorities after they make crossing.

Now, I bunked off school quite a fair bit and I'm not too good at adding up.  However I'm pretty sure when all the costs incurred are added up my proposals would cost the country a damn site less than what it's costing to not returning them.

Oh, and along side returning the ones here we could have a couple of navy vessels patrolling our waters and actually return them to France before they get here in the first place.

[Pewit 971]

2 minutes ago, mackay said:

Now, I bunked off school quite a fair bit and I'm not too good at adding up.  However I'm pretty sure when all the costs incurred are added up my proposals would cost the country a damn site less than what it's costing to not returning them.

Oh, and along side returning the ones here we could have a couple of navy vessels patrolling our waters and actually return them to France before they get here in the first place.

Then it would be just a game of asylum seeker ping pong between us & France lol.

We have to work together with the EU and put forward some sensible measure.